Stanisław Michalkiewicz: Good news
Finally any good news we haven't had since the 18th century! As it is known, in the 18th century there were partitions of Poland, after which the state ceased to be for 123 years. As a result, our little valuable indigenous nation may have acquired inalienable inferiority complexes towards another nations, especially those which grew into feathers in the 19th century and either divided the planet among themselves, or, like Germany, looked for any “India”.
As we know, the German election fell on Russia, where during planet War I the Bolshevik revolution broke out, which was the most successful operation of the German General Staff. And who knows what the past of Europe would look like, especially Central and east Europe, if America hadn't entered the war. Thanks to its inclusion in the struggles, Germany was defeated – but they shortly made another effort to accomplish hegemony in Europe, which Adolf Hitler did to a large extent.
But America joined the war again, resulting in Hitler losing, and by the way the United States led to the liquidation of the British Empire to take his place. In all these events Poland's participation was alternatively marginal, and frequently it was an unconscious participant. In fact, these days it is impossible to do otherwise; for a fresh division of the planet the powers compete against each other, while the states of the petty amphibians satisfy themselves with the function of vassals.
This is not a terrible thing, due to the fact that even if you are a vassal, you can have policies in accordance with your own state interest, as illustrated by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. Why can't our beloved leaders even stand for specified independence? The secret is simply a large one, although not so large again, if we appeal to my favourite conspiracy theory. As you know, the hardest core of the communist strategy was security.
Safers are demoralized people – due to the fact that in order to become a safety guard, whatever – for communes or for democracy – you gotta have any intellectual and moral perversion. In addition, the safety nets are intelligent and observant, so erstwhile it turned out that Soviets would evacuate from Central Europe, the safety nets turned around to supply an insurance policy under fresh systemic conditions.
There was no uncertainty that as shortly as the Soviets withdrew, the alliances would be reversed. So the safety guards converted to service our future allies in the right view that they would supply protection.
And due to the fact that in our unhappy country the inheritance of social position is dynamically developing: – children of actors become actors, children of singers – singers, and children of confiscations – confiscators – are conditions created 30 years ago, in the era of systemic transformation, they reproduce in a simple way in subsequent generations of the Ubek dynasty.
This is our main political problem – but that is what the majority of citizens do not want to accept, feeding on various substitutes, which the old skewers bring under their noses the political phase of our bantań.
For example, if the opponents of the Smolensk monthly are not agents hired by the ABW – which cannot be ruled out – then they must be crazy if they are beating themselves up to death under the pretext whether Putin attacked president Lech Kaczyński or no 1 swung, and the president – like the another 95 people – was simply killed in an air accident. And if they're not crazy, they must be very happy people if they don't have much to worry about.
But adequate of these digressions, due to the fact that it's time to explain what good news is, and 1 we haven't gotten since the 18th century? I mean, of course, "debate," that is, between the Democratic organization presidential candidate Kamala Harris, and the Republican organization presidential candidate Donald Trump.
Both sides of the mouth tried to prove the two-person red woman there. Agnieszka Gozdyr, that each candidate is so stupid that he is not fit to be president of the United States. This may even be actual – but we should not forget that 1 of them will be president in November.
Of course, the candidate will then be the same as now – and that's why, erstwhile he is president-elect, the Pentagon generals will come to him, high-ranking CIA and FBI safety guards, Goldmany-Sachsy from Wall Street, the influence Jews from the media and amusement manufacture will begin to reconstruct the sense of reality to him: “We here, Mr president (or “Mr President”) conduct specified and specified secret operations, in specified a way and so advanced, so in order for the planet not to collapse, it will should be done, and then this, and then that, and then that, even more so.”
And the audience's favourite already knows what is right for him to do, so what he says during these mouths has no or very small meaning. But it cannot be said out loud, on the contrary – it should be said out loud that whoever wins specified a mouth, the planet will either collapse or, on the contrary, survive. So now the condemning feuds have begun, who won the mouthpiece.
This reminds me of 1 of Stanisław Lem's stories from “Cyberiady”How 2 planets waged war. It lasted 10 years and then 5 more, due to the fact that after the first 10 years it was not known precisely who won. So, while the “body speech” specialists were involved, it turned out that Mrs. Kamala Harris had learned everything by heart and that's why she trampled like a shot.
It's nothing new; we had this method utilized by Mrs. Red. Irena Take care in the broadcast “Tele Echo”. She besides told invited guests to learn the answer to their memory, and if 1 in the video forgot the text, she mildly guided him until he regained his rhythm. Besides, what is there to return to “Ech’s Tele” erstwhile it is adequate to remind the 2020 presidential candidate Margaret Kidawa-Błońska. Apparently, she had a good memory, but a short memory, so the Grand Honourable MP of Pupka, standing behind her, whispered to her in a staged whisper, further issues that she spoke loudly.
As we can see, our democracy is no different from American democracy, especially erstwhile we remember the bronze insights of the classical of democracy by Joseph Stalin – for example, that it is more crucial than who votes who counts the votes. Is it the same with this figure in America as with us, that the full number of votes cast draws the square root, then the consequence is subtracted from the yearly production of umbrellas, and you can immediately see who won and who lost?
We besides recommend: More Ukrainians with false stamps in passports
