Zachodnia democracy and judaic capitalism make us “good”whether we want it or not – cd.
If GDPR is not applicable to EU decision-makers and to the global fresh planet Finance Facility, what intent has it been introduced for and why can the processing of our data and their transfer take place without our consent and knowledge?
Below is the continuation of my conversation with AI on GDPR
DK: If I do not agree to the GDPR rules and sign the GDPR form, will I be able to usage the services of wellness services and settle authoritative matters in the public administration in Poland ?
ChatGPT said:
This is simply a very good and applicable question – it concerns the legal basis for processing individual data in Poland, especially in the context of the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation).
The answer is: Yes, you can usage public services (e.g. wellness services, offices), even if you do not consent to the processing of individual data — due to the fact that in these cases processing takes place on a different legal basis than consent.
Often the alleged institutions or offices present. GDPR information form — It's not consentbut Information obligation resulting from Art. 13 GDPR.
By signing it, You confirm that you have read the informationnot that you consent to the processing of data.
DK: If individual data are processed on the basis of legal provisions, i.e. without having to get my consent, then why is the full procedure forced to learn about the GDPR – after all, it is simply a waste of employees' time and waste of paper – ?
ChatGPT said:
A large and very accurate question – you contact on the heart of the problem, which many people announcement in practice the functioning of the GDPR in Poland.
Indeed, many places (especially in public offices and institutions) have the impression that "GDPR is paper science". But the origin of this situation lies in incorrect knowing of the provisions and Overzealous usenot in the regulation itself.
GDPR requires Information, and not the work to “agree”
DK: If this is an information work and not an work to “agree” to the GDPR, what intent do I gotta sign the information form if I do not consent to the GDPR?
ChatGPT said:
Great question — and absolutely right.
What you announcement is 1 of most common errors in applicable application of GDPR in Poland.
In short: There is no work to sign anything under the alleged "GDPR information", and even more so, there is no request to sign any “witness about knowing” it.
DK: If there is no work to sign anything under the alleged “GDPR” information, for what intent are the institutions obliged to submit specified forms to the applicants?
ChatGPT said:
A large question — and it truly touches the heart of the bureaucratic absurdity that arose around GDPR.
The answer is: institutions are not obliged to submit the GDPR forms to the petitioners for signature.
They do it. on its own initiativeCommon with excessive caution, wrong explanation of the law or "paper proof" habits.
DK: So any institution can freely process my data without my consent and without my knowledge? So the GDPR form is just a safety for institutions (?).
ChatGPT said:
Great question — and a very accurate observation.
What you wrote, sounds logical at first glance.But in reality, things are different.
No — the institution cannot freely process your data without your consent and without your knowledge.
The GDPR form is besides not a "security" for institutions, but (unfortunately frequently misused) an information work tool.
Which is: public institutions process the data not due to the fact that you agree, just due to the fact that you order them to do so.
DK: What law requires public institutions to process my individual data?
ChatGPT said:
Great question — it concerns the legal basis for the processing of individual data by public institutions.
In Poland (and the European Union as a whole), the main government governing this is:
1. GDPR (Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council)
or General Data Protection Regulation, applicable from 25 May 2018
Key rule:
Art. 6(1)(c) and e GDPR:
Public authorities may process individual data where:
(c) processing is necessary to comply with the legal obligation, which is charged with the admin (e.g. the office),
(e) processing is necessary for the performance of a public interest task or in the exercise of public authority entrusted to the administrator.
Thus, public bodies have an obligation process your data if this is due to legal provisions (e.g. the Act on the Registration of People, Taxes, Educational System, etc.).
DK: If public institutions process data not due to the fact that I agree to it, just due to the fact that they are ordered to do so by the law, then there has been a breach of my fundamental rights by the decision-makers who introduced the GDPR – ?
ChatGPT said:
Great and very deep question — you contact here the fundamental tension between the privacy of the individual and the functioning of the state and society.
No, no. GDPR does not violate your fundamental rights — on the contrary, GDPR was introduced precisely to strengthen and defend these rights, even if the data must be processed without your permission.
GDPR does not take distant your rights – it establishes and guarantees them. – (-) ? – DK)
Just due to the fact that you don't always request your consent doesn't mean you're losing control.
GDPR introduces the principle: “You can process data only if you have reason to do so — and the data subject is to know how and why you do it.”
DK: What rights do I gotta block the transmission of my data outside the EU?
ChatGPT said:
Great question — and very specific. 
This, whether you can block the transfer of your data outside the European Union (EEA), depends on who and on what basis processes this data.
But in general: Yes, you have the right to object or limit data transfer outside the EU, although this will not be effective in all situations (e.g. with respect to state institutions).
"GDPR does not violate your fundamental rights – on the contrary, GDPR was introduced precisely to strengthen and defend these rights." – ? – If I cannot prohibit the processing of my data and if the EU can transmit this data even to Israel, which can freely process this data, that means that this data is not protected in practice, and I have no anticipation of blocking its processing, so my rights are clearly broken by the totalitarian EU system, which is not far from the totalitarian Nazi 3rd Reich of A.Hitler – ?
Dariusz Kosiur
