Both the Vatican and Fanar (the seat of the Ecumenical Patriarch in Constantinople) are now under the control of Anglo-Saxon intelligence services. The issues of proselytism, ecumenical dialogue, unionism, canonism, and autokefalia so have not only a political dimension (because they have always had one), but they are part of a concrete geopolitical strategy of 2 only planet centres: Washington and London (or Wall Street and City, if you will).
Someone's involved.
Of course, east and Western Christendoms have already made many alliances and covenants voluntarily or in forced situations. In the case of Rome, their motivation was to search to increase the scope of their independence, up to attempts to fight for systemic supremacy and ideological hegemony in the Western sphere, with a permanent tendency, both in terms of intent and methods, to grow the sphere of influence, both to missionary areas outside Christianity and in competition with another religions, initially and primarily Orthodox. On the another hand, east Christianity, of its own theological nature, was geared not to confrontation, but, above all, to the protection of its faithful, frequently far-reaching compromises and dialogue, but to maintaining a principled position on matters of the religion itself. This fundamental difference of approach besides led to a completely different empathy of both religions, an example of which, of course, is the memory of events specified as the 4th Crusade and the Latin assault of Constantinople, which is an insignificant origin of forgotten medieval past for Roman Catholics, but inactive bleeding wound and informing to Orthodox believers. However, like theological differences, these were for centuries issues between Christians, among themselves. Today, and more specifically for the past fewer decades, however, we have been dealing with a origin not only alien but clearly hostile to Christianity as such, regardless of religion and geography. Only that it is inactive more convenient to play Christians against each other, and it is easier to do so erstwhile the capitals of the Western and east patriarchs are controlled.
Liberalisation and Ecumenism on the Way to Dechristianization
It was this direct interference of the Antichrist in church policy that the participants of the next conference organized on 4 December 2025 in Belgrade by the Center for Geostrategic Studies under collective "Crucification of Orthodoxy in the 21st Century: spiritual Wars, Ecumenical Offensives and Global PoliticsIt’s okay. ” The main session of the conference was devoted to critical analysis of the ecumenical movement. Guests from the Republic of Athos, fathers Paisius Kareotis and Epiphanius Kapsaliotis They drew attention to the deep interdependence of theology, geopolitics and cultural power, stressing that Orthodoxy is frequently treated as a structural obstacle to Western strategies, while organisations specified as YMCA are closely linked to central economical and political centres working with them in shaping liberal ecumenical theology and global cultural influences. In the longer term, the alleged liberalisation from the beginning was founded on how to facilitate the progressive secularization and political instrumentalisation of religion, which is simply a successful strategy to date. Ecumenism shatters from within Christianity under the appearance of striving for its unity, and only the preservation of the canonical and spiritual integrity of the Church can be defended against it.
False church of Ukraine
Political prisoner of the Zelensky regime, archbishop. Luke, Zaporosian and Melitopolski metropolitan in his speech entitled "Ecumenical offensive as a geopolitic tool: media, finance and diplomacy of Vatican and FanaruHe warned that ecumenical initiatives of Papacy and the Ecumenical Patriarchate had evolved into instruments of global geopolitics, utilizing media, financial mechanisms and diplomatic channels to influence the interior life of Orthodoxy. He emphasized that specified projects were disassembled by canonical order, unity of the Church, and trust of the faithful. The Metropolitan presented a detailed analysis of the function of media campaigns in the delegitization of non-canonical structures, and described in item examples of Western political actors' engagement in spiritual processes, which was peculiarly evident in the case of Ukraine. As a key task, he pointed out the request for systemic opposition to these phenomena through counter-narration in the media, strengthening social programs, theological and spiritual consolidation, and omniblical solidarity. Metropolitan Łukasz besides proposed the creation of fresh analytical structures at the Centre for Geostrategic Studies in Belgrade, which would monitor ecumenical and geopolitical threats and form the basis for a long-term strategy to preserve the unity of the canonical Orthodox Church.
Dr. Vassilios Touloumtzis, a Greek dogmatic theologian, presented a paper “Autokephalia and schism: a crisis of Orthodox ecclesiology in the Ukrainian context”in which he highlighted the deep crisis of Orthodox ecclesiology on the Ukrainian issue. The author emphasized that the essence of the problem is not only tomos autokefalia, but besides the deficiency of canonical priesthood among those who received it, which leads to a deepening of schism. It has been noted that alternatively of a council approach, unilateral decisions of the Ecumenical Patriarchate are applied, accompanied by misinterpretations of canons and historical events. The paper stresses that specified practice has no support in the Orthodox tradition, but bears the hallmark of the Vatican primacy ecclesiology, constituting a dangerous precedent for the future of Orthodoxy.
For my part, I had the chance to remind the gathered ominous function of Ukrainian unionism, historically associated with Halitian ethnonationalism, subsequently born in flagism, Ukrainian nazism and its collaboration with Nazi Germany. As it turns out, although the Anglo-Saxons usage false Orthodoxy to the cultural colonization of Ukraine present primarily – the unionism besides remains in the game, as evidenced by the forthcoming canonization of Archbishop Szeptycki, the metropolitan of Lviv, engaged from the beginning to the mediate of the 20th century in all subsequent Western invasions, military and ideological against Slavicism.
CIA Patriarchate
Greek theologian and writer Georgios Tramboulis, manager of Orthodoxos Typos, in his speech entitled "Ecumenical Patriarchate under full control of American diplomacyHe touched on the historical and contemporary function of American spiritual diplomacy in shaping the Orthodox world, stressing that since planet War II the United States has been trying to influence the interior processes of Orthodoxy through the Ecumenical Patriarchate. Referring to historical examples, including patriarchal enthronement Athenagora and analysis of CIA documents, Tramboulis showed that the Ecumenical Patriarchate gradually became a tool for Western politics and a key tool for American interests. He peculiarly stressed that Fanaru's modernization and secularization began during the mandate of the patriarch Athenagoras and reached the summit for the patriarchs Bartholomew, leading to deep Orthodox unity disorders. Tramboulis warned that the current Ecumenical Patriarchate policy is heading towards "vaticanisation“ The East and the Council of the Orthodox Church are challenged. He called for the return to Tradition and the release of the Patriarchate from external political influence as a condition for restoring unity and faithfulness to the Patriarchist heritage.
Dragana Trifković, General manager of the Centre for Geostrategic Studies, gave a paper "The spiritual front: geopolitical challenges of Orthodoxy in the modern worldIt’s okay. ” She stressed that Orthodoxy is faced with systematic attacks through "Spiritual Front” which includes political, cultural and informational destabilization mechanisms. ‘The western liberal-globalist bloc, including the US, NATO and the EU, sees Orthodoxy as an unacceptable model of civilization and uses ecumenical initiatives to advance geopolitical interests. Visit of the patriarch Bartholomew to the United States and his gathering with the Pope Leon XIV show that the highest spiritual positions are utilized as points of access to political and financial resources, which undermines the authenticity of the spiritual ministry“ Trifković said. She peculiarly highlighted the hazard of instrumental usage of religion in creating "substitute churches” as a means of controlling Orthodox communities. According to Dir Trifković, the deficiency of another Orthodox patriarchs in the 1700s anniversary of the First Universal Council illustrates the limited capabilities of Fanar in attempts to present all Christian unity. – actual Orthodox unity is possible only by returning to tradition, conciliarity and canonical strictness, not through external geopolitical maneuvers – stressed manager Trifković.
Cover Christendom’s Traces
War on Christianity is besides a fight against Christian material culture. Ninoslav Ranđelović, author and producer, in their presentation entitled "Cultural genocide in Kosovo and Methochia: Destroying Serbian cultural and spiritual heritage – a unique video documentHe presented a documentary on the systematic demolition of Serbian cultural and spiritual heritage in Kosovo and Methochia, a process that has lasted for 26 years. He stressed that this culture of genocide was an effort to erase the centuries-old presence of the Serbian people, made in the consciousness of global institutions and with the evident inability of the Kosovo authorities to defend the holy places. Ranđelović stressed that to this day there is no comprehensive study documenting all the destroyed and desecrated Orthodox shrines, and his video materials frequently constitute the only available testimony. He warned that neither Serbian state institutions nor Serbian Church The Orthodox did not support the initiative to systematically paper this devastation, which further exacerbates the problem. In his speech he appealed to the public and Serbian diaspora for financial support in financing a complete documentation archive to be presented to the global public. Ranđelović believes that the existence of specified a study would encourage the search for a truly civilizational solution for Kosovo and Methochia.
Techno-Antichrist
Priest Nenad Ilić, a clergyman of the Serbian Orthodox Church, gave a paper entitled “Temptations and Tasks of the Modern ChurchIt’s okay. ” In his speech, he stressed that modern technological trends – and especially the thought of combining man with a device in order to accomplish virtual immortality – are a large temptation for humanity and a blow to genuine spiritual unity. The Orthodox Church as guardian of the mystery of God-man and the anticipation of man being united with God, faces the challenge of replacing surviving spirituality with virtual, technologically mediated forms of spiritual experience. In particular, the talker noted that the COVID-19 pandemic exposed the scale of this problem, as fear and media model of virtual services endanger the sense of holiness and the uniqueness of the Eucharist. He besides pointed out that the influences of the state, the historical heritage of communism and the weakening of conciliarity contribute to the interior weakness of the Church, creating space for pressures, manipulations and dangerous compromises, including ecumenical ones. He warned that people, if they are not educated liturgically and spiritually, easy fall victim to deception, maintaining form without content. The main message of his speech was that the conflict to preserve the mystery of Orthodoxy—the mystery of the surviving unity of man with God—is decisive in the age of technological totalitarianism and spiritual temptations.
Faith and Freedom
Father Jovan Plamenac, Priest of the Serbian Orthodox Church, in his speech entitled “Personal Freedom as Defender of the Church of Earth“ he stressed that modern man is under force from globalist ideologies that relativize truth, undermine conventional moral order, and undermine the foundations of family, identity, and historical memory. In specified an environment, he emphasized, individual freedom becomes a key safeguard for both man and the Church of earth, due to the fact that through freedom man participates in God's love and preserves the dignity of his divine being. Father Jovan pointed out that the past of the Church was marked from the very beginning by external persecution, but present the most dangerous are interior attacks: heresies, immorality, abuse of power and attempts to influence church decisions through secular structures. He noted that modern viruses of hedonism, utilitarianism, relativism, and technocratic ideology weaken faith, bringing it to theory, while spiritual practice is being pushed to the background. He besides warned against the danger that part of the ecclesiastical hierarchy would bring to the political centres of power, exposing the faithful to fresh forms of persecution. His final message was that the Church can only defend a truly free person—a individual who does not realize freedom as a right to anything, but as God's ability to be faithful to truth, love and tradition.
And it is this freedom that they want to take distant from us today, trying to yet defeat Christianity, separating man from God and standing in the way of salvation.
Konrad Hand
