The title of Article 241 of the Criminal Code is: ‘[Infringement of the secret of investigation or trial] § 1.Any individual who, without authorisation, makes public information on the investigation before being disclosed in judicial proceedings shall be subject to fines, imprisonment or imprisonment of up to 2 years.”.
It was intended to defend the persons subject to the investigation so that information about it would not leak to the media. Anyone who knows how the prosecution works in the III Republic, police and akin services, has no illusions that the durszlak is simply a solid semisphere without a single hole, while controlled leaks are tools of political propaganda, the same as the alleged justice and mainstream media. The article is utilized to close its mouth to the suspects themselves/future defendants and prevent them from appealing to public support.
Pure hypothetical situation
In view of the above, then, imagine a purely hypothetical situation in which a sympathetic woman reads 30 questions to me from a card, and, of course, I cannot conclude that this has anything to do with any current preparatory procedure. Moreover, this has nothing to do with reality at all, as you will see erstwhile you get to know the pure surreality of the full situation, which, of course, I cannot say at all.
If I realize the direction in which the proceeding is being conducted, which I do not inform, referring solely to the hypothetical situation – I may be accused of causing a direct safety threat by failing to exercise peculiar care during the attack on Sahryn on 10 March 1944. Investigators could be peculiarly curious in specified an imaginary situation in whether civilian casualties could be avoided during the conflict of BCh and AK troops from UPA and why I did not avoid them. I'd love to ask my grandfather's uncle, Major. Stanisław Basaj, ‘Risia’But his soldiers fought there. Unfortunately, I won't have a chance for the time being, due to the fact that on March 25, 1945, my uncle's grandpa was murdered by the uppers, twisting him in a toilet and his remains have not yet been found.
In addition to attacking Sahryn in specified a hypothetical proceeding that I do not inform, I could besides be charged with attacking Ukraine on 24 February 2022. due to the fact that that was the day I posted analysis The effects of this event on Poland – according to the investigators, it is apparent that I had to know about it before, due to the fact that how did I make my own conclusions?! After all, individual must have sent them to me earlier, approved, agreed, more or little as is the case between the prosecution and its political management and the embassies of respective countries managing manually the 3rd Republic of Poland.
Not all prosecutor is an idiot.
Investigators in specified a hypothetical proceeding, whose details I do not reveal, could besides mention to the well-known "or flag = Ukrainian". I have talked about it and wrote it many times, so I am happy to repeat it: erstwhile I compose and say “badder” I do not mean all Ukrainians, as I write, speaking and reasoning “idiot” I do not mention to all prosecutors. I have any colleagues in this profession, they're kind and not stupid people, but they gotta live off something. Besides, Gogol already wrote “There is only 1 good man there: the prosecutor; but besides this, in truth, pig”. The point is, Gogol is Ukrainian, but Russian writer. Is there an additional charge for quoting specified a case, although of course I can't say that there is any proceeding in this case?
Is it a crime to consider Grzegorz Braun a good Pole?
A completely out-of-the-box fight against UPA in hypothetical proceedings could besides arise the issue of extinguishing Chanukiji In the Sejm. In 1 of interviews I said, Grzegorz Braun He acted like a Pole, like a man and like a decent man. I realize that considering Grzegorz Braun as a decent man is already a crime in the 3rd Republic of Poland and I do not anticipate anything better from the 3rd Republic of Poland, either hypothetically or realistically.
I told you a purely hypothetical, literary, and surreal story. After all, it is impossible for a contemporary writer to be accused, and yet besides to be judged for fighting by the AK and BCh against Nazis from UPA. Article 54 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland provides each ‘freedom to express its views and to get and disseminate information’. Despite the past 36 years, it can inactive be considered that there are good people and honest Poles among Members of the Sejm and MEPs. Yeah, I guess you can even dream of more. This is how Poland is and should be, and no talk about the prosecution will change that.
Right?
Konrad Hand
