.
And that is the primary nonsubjective adopted by the UN ‘Pact for the Future’.
.
Polemic text for ‘stanislav’ proposals contained in the summary of the text:https://wps.neon24.net/post/177877,Russia-from-distant-s-from-consensus-onz-in-case-pact-for-future
.
It may be worth remembering what it was like with UN Resolution 181 recognising the emergence of the Zionist State of Israel, who exerted force on whom and how it was exerted, can be read here:https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resolution_Collection_General_ONZ_nr_181but better read ‘Zion Strategy’D. Reed. Or, as it happened in 1990, after the overthrow of the socialist states, in which the Roman Curia was heavy involved, the withdrawal of UN Resolution 3379 of 1975, condemning Zionism as a racist ideology.
Today the Zionist global financier – this ‘deep country’ – in the US and the UK.Britania has a much better arsenal of force measures to warrant its support for the alleged Future Pact – and even though the EU as a vassal of a Zionist "deep state" is voting in accordance with its order, and even against the interests of its societies.
My colleague Paul – “stanislav” wrote in his summary:
‘The primary nonsubjective is to weaken Russia's global position, which has been mostly successful."
For the moment, that is, in the short term, it has actually succeeded, but the war of the alleged West, that is, in reality the Zionist "deep state" with Russia (and most likely not only Russia) continues and it is not known whether Zionists will be able to preserve their planet hegemony – simplifying: whether they will be able to preserve the hegemony of US, or planet parasitism on the work of nations, in the long term. That's why all the organization treatments. ‘Pact for the Future’, due to the fact that the Zionist "deep state" was in the defence and hegemony of US dollars is no longer so obvious, nor so certain, and possibly not only due to the increasing importance of BRICS countries, but mainly due to the demolition of US dollars (by the usury and creation of US dollars in geometric progress, resulting in an already endless and increasing inflation – and this was made possible by judaic capitalism) – the demolition of US dollars as a means of economical exchange. $US has become a waste paper, whose credibility can only be defended by US cannons and Wlk.Britania – and we do not know what the desperation of the "deep state" will lead to, which, if it does not find safe asylum, can put everything on the table: atomic war.
Paul’s next reflection:
‘Russia was skillfully provoked in February 2022 to launch a war in Ukraine is and will be created as an aggressor threatening global peace and order. The deficiency of a strong and consistent policy especially within the country, by the president and the current government of Russia, makes Russia's position internationally worse all month."
I do not know how critically I can relate to my colleague's above-mentioned constitution so as not to violate her spirit of serious, political, publicist, but I will try. In my opinion, the biggest, even tragic, mistake of Putin's collective policy, or Russian authorities, was that they did not invitation my colleague to cooperate as a political advisor. I am absolutely convinced that then – thanks to political cognition and political prudence and the persuasion of my colleague (as well as his Russian, patriotic, media hinters), “Russia would not be provoked to war in Ukraine, and its authorities would be much more efficient and completely courageous and decisively pursuing interior policy, which would bring Russia to the planet leader of the global arena.
And a small attention to the end of the war in Ukraine. If we look honestly at Russia's military actions in Ukraine, the word "war" is an abuse. Without going into detail, it is worth remembering what wars led and inspired by the US, e.g. in Yugoslavia, where the attacks were aimed at workplaces, cities and civilians. Does identical military actions lead Russia in Ukraine ? If this happens, this is due solely to the tactics recommended by the US to usage civilians as a shield for the actions of their troops – and this is nothing but an component of terrorism from which the US and its fellow Israelis are known. Therefore, the word ‘Special Military Operation’ utilized by the Russian authorities is entirely justified.
Dariusz Kosiur
