The candidate for president of the Republic of Poland – Artur Bartoszewicz, has late enjoyed the increasing support of the free environment. Calm, balanced, understanding, reasonable. He defended the flood, opposes the usage of us by the Union and Ukraine, he points to the errors of the government, including in the economical sphere. With this and many another statements he gained sympathy of many Poles. However, Dr. Bartoszewicz besides has a second face. Legends of his throwing unsprayed students out of his class are besides accused of supporting Israeli genocide in the Palestinians. What's it truly like? This and many another doubts about Artur Bartoszewicz in item can be found out in the following text.
1. STRAINS, STUDENTS, COVID
Is it actual that the lecturer at the Warsaw School of Economics Artur Bartoszewicz threw out students who refused to take the preparation on Covid-19? Especially since he's denying it. Well... yes, it is. At least if you believe his words.
In the debate Polsat News, in which he clashed with editor Warzecha, he stated that "the alleged anti-vaccinationists and flatlanders" are a threat to the population, adding, "I'VE PROVIDED STUDENTS WHO ARE UNSTRAYING FROM THEIR ESTIMATION".
In another conversation, he declared himself a supporter of forced vaccination. According to Bartoszewicz, many diseases appeared again in Poland due to the fact that Poles stopped immunizing. "Everybody should be vaccinated for compulsory vaccinations" is his recipe for solving the problem.
2. FAN ISRAELA, MANOPER
Bartoszewicz besides became celebrated for calling to Poland's alliance with Israel, calling him “a strong, future partner” in the Mission Business Programme. He would besides postulate Jews who have problems moving around any parts of the planet due to their origins... to give Polish passports. That's not all!
He went through himself in a conversation with Wojciech Mulik from the channel “Goniec”. Assuming that Israel is simply a dam for muslim terrorism, he openly suggested that the Israeli military has the right to bomb Palestinian civilians to the effect of terrorist acts by Hamas. The speaker's remark that "they slaughter the people of Palestine" said, "Let them slaughter it."
However, Bartoszewicz "forgets" what the roots of the conflict are and that tens (and possibly hundreds) of thousands of Palestinians are illegally detained or even tortured in Israeli prisons, under conditions that frequently insult human dignity. And it is not about supporting acts of panic by Muslim radicals. But are they as large a threat as raised and progressing in the spirit of racist and chauvinist Talmud Jewry?
3. SCHOOL INTELLIGENCE
Dr. Bartoszewicz is simply a large enthusiast of this invention. The future of Poland is based on AI and its development. Well, it's hard to deny that artificial intelligence has its advantages and can make life easier, but what about threats? What about utilizing it for profiling and censorship? To sow false messages? What about replacing employees (e.g. consultants) with bots? Does Artur Bartoszewicz truly believe that specified a broad improvement of artificial intelligence in any areas will not entail serious abuse in others? It's hard to believe a man that intelligent is so gullible.
4. ANTISYSTEMATION THAT THE strategy DOESN'T RECOGNIZE
We have seen clearly how the alleged strategy can stigmatize the uncomfortable in many ways. So how is it possible that in view of the increasing popularity of Bartoszewicz he moves rather freely between the free media and mainstream, openly preaching his views without major attempts to discredit him?
5. IN THE COUNTRY OF VIKT
Another mystery: How does it happen that a lecturer with specified uncomfortable opinions (both in Poland and in the EU) depends on the state's money, not on the part of the country?
6. REGISTRATION
Artur Bartoszewicz registered as 1 of the first. And again: why did the strategy not make this hard for him, like for Maciej Maciak or Romuald Starosielc (who was yet rejected)?
Of course, the last 3 points are no proof and they do not prejudge anything yet, but they can make you think hard.
7. A right-wing elektorate crusher?
Every careful voter noted from the right political side a phenomenon called "distorting the electorate", designed to divide and dispute right-wing supporters, and consequently the image of Trzaskowski gains. A unusual coincidence Dr. Bartoszewicz reported his candidacy at the time. Not before, although it would be much more logical in the context of building support, but just then. Moreover, his counter-candidate and colleague from the channel “Nam Depends” – Jan Kuban, who, unlike Bartoszewicz, built popularity on this channel for years and who, although not an perfect candidate, is surely more trustworthy, collected only 16,300 signatures and fell off in the runoffs. Mission accomplished?
These facts, regardless of the rightness of the another views raised by Artur Bartoszewicz, should disqualify him as a trustworthy and credible presidential candidate.
FROM THE AUTHOR: I besides sent him a message, presenting myself by name, asking for a short conversation to give him the chance to address any issues. I didn't get an answer.
Source:
It depends on us.
Goniec.pl
Business Mission
freemedia.net
YouTube
