Holocaust

HOLOCAUST BUSINESS

The text should make us aware of their motives

representatives of science, literature and art, with dual state loyalty

and Talmudic double morality, which, for the money of the Polish taxpayer, make “works” defaming Poland and Poles, allegedly on behalf of freedom of expression.

Their “products” are well placed in the “psychology of shame” discussed by me, which is to bring us Poles to our knees and force us to meet the astronomical claims of the “Jewish lobby” in the USA. Can you imagine that any of them will make any “politically incorrect” work, describing the martyrdom of Poles at the hands of their relatives specified as Berman, Różanski, Morel, Stefan Michnik, etc.

All the more we should appreciate the attempts of our current authorities to rise the young generation of Poles in a patriotic spirit and remind the nation of our glorious past modeled on large Poles of literature, art, conflict for independency of Poland and the United States, specified as Tadeusz Kościuszko, Kazimierz Pulaski of the coat of arms of Blindowron fighting for independency of Poland and the United States.

THE HOLOCAUST INDUSTRY:

REFLECTIONS ON THE EXPLOITATION

OF judaic SUFFERING

Mr Norman G. Finkelsten

(RECENSION)

HOLOCAUST BUSINESS

Although this book was written more than 10 years ago, it is inactive

Very current. We are presently seeing worrying attempts to redefine another European countries outside Germany (and in peculiar Poland) as contributors to the Holocaust (or at least to accuse them of "participation in the Holocaust") for rather apparent reasons. Since the Jews have already received immense sums of money as compensation for the Holocaust, why limit themselves to Germany? It is clear that with any exceptions, Poles owe nothing to Jews. All judaic demands for compensation for lost judaic property during the Holocaust, carried out by the Germans, were already met in the 1950s and 1960s.

The holocaust wasn't the only human being

Professor Norman Finkelstein is very critical of the belief that the suffering of Jews was something peculiar and that it deserves peculiar memory. His own mother, who survived the Holocaust, was opposed to making distinctions

morals between the sufferings of different nationalities (p. 8). prof. Norman Finkelstein considers this problem and rejects the arguments that are presented to support the uniqueness of the Holocaust.

In his opinion, they are internally inconsistent and sterile intellectually. He notices that erstwhile an argument is refuted, a fresh 1 immediately appears in his place. He mocks the thought that the Holocaust is an event that is not subject to rational knowing or that it is absolute evil. He shows that the present Holocaust absorption, both among Jews and non-Jews, only began 20 years after planet War II and rejects the view that it was simply a delayed consequence of the judaic community to the injury caused by those events. It shows that there is no evidence of specified a group delayed reaction to injury. prof. Norman Finkelstein does not jump to any conclusions regarding the recognition of the actual basis for Holocaust claims.

Uniqueness: Exceptional suffering creates the basis for exceptional claims (p. 47). He sees that for any Jews it is even a form of same - exaltation of this nation over another groups.

TODAY’S LIFE OF PERSPECTIVE

Professor Norman Finkelstein points out the exceptionally favourable situation of Jews in the United States, where they were very successful. Revenues of American Jews in

per capita is almost twice as large as representatives of another cultural groups (p. 32). Sixteen of the forty richest Americans are Jews. Forty percent of American Nobel Prize winners in discipline and economics are Jews. The share of judaic professors of origin at major American universities is over 20 percent, and in leading law firms in fresh York and Washington, the share of Jews reaches

Forty percent.

GENEZA ‘HOlocAUST INDUSTRY’

Professor Norman Finkelstein traces “the Holocaust industry” from the beginning to the increasingly gross abuse of money from reparations that began with the West Germany in 1952. At the time, the number of " Holocaust survivors" was cut to an absurd degree (even erstwhile the second and 3rd generations were incorporated)

those who experienced the Holocaust). Moreover, so far only 15 percent

Indeed, the money from the reparation went to the Jews who survived the Holocaust! The remainder went to judaic and judaic organizations that never passed through the Holocaust, but which attributed themselves the right to claim to talk on behalf of judaic victims. prof. Norman Finkelstein calls it “a scam”. He then discusses the extortion of Switzerland to pay $1.25 billion that had to do so in order to avoid the country being credited with a group of “anti-Semitic”, “insensitive” states that “no

they want to reconcile with their own past", etc., even though claims concerning the confiscation of judaic assets in Swiss banks proved almost entirely unfounded.

POLICE AS A applicable nonsubjective "HOlocAUST PRESIDENTSHIP"

The anti-Polish speech which can be found in materials concerning the Holocaust confirms the suspicion that many Poles are dealing with intentional action. prof. Norman Filkenstein clearly confirms that. Poles know precisely what the alleged pedagogyof shame means. The communist authorities have frequently applied this method to those accused of something and the only way to free themselves from constant force and “rehabilitating” was “accusation.” Now the Holocaust company is engaging its own version of the pedagogy of shame. The constant depiction of Poles as primitive and wicked people is aimed at creating shame in Poles and forcing them

Paying back the Holocaust company and generating global force on Poland to force it to do so. At the same time, instilling guilt in young, mostly unaware Poles, is designed to

make them more submissive to the Jews. The Pole is already accustomed to the standard “Holocaust speech”, specified as “we must face the dark chapters of our history” and “come to an agreement with the past.” prof. Norman Finkelstein touches on the anti-Polish aspects of the Holocaust manufacture (p. 130-133). However, actions concerning the alleged restitution of judaic property go far beyond the efforts of inactive alive Jews to recover their pre-war property or in the case of Jews surviving in Poland to recover any pre-war municipal property. Claims on compensation

and reparations will never be able to be satisfied, and it may even happen that Jews will press Poland to pay for everything that belonged to Jews before the war, even though Poland was occupied by the Germans and no of Poles had anything to say about taking over judaic property and murdering Jews. Of course, this would in practice mean full bankruptcy of Poland. But if we want to adopt this solution and apply it consistently and reliably, it would have to

also means that Poland will gotta pay compensation to Germany for the land taken over after the war, while Ukraine, Belarus and Lithuania will gotta pay Poland compensation for pre-war Polish land occupied by the Union

Soviet. But why halt there? Is not present Germany and Russia

should pay Poland compensation for all the immense losses that

She suffered during planet War II under German-Soviet occupation?

Again we meet with old double standards of Talmudic morality, according to which 1 law applies to Jews, and the other, little favorable, to goi. William D. Rubinstein, prof. of past at the University of Wales, supports Norman Finkelstein's conclusions on "Holocaust Industry", and in peculiar on attempts to extort damages from Poland.

Prof. Wilkiem D. Rubinstein reviewed Norman Finkelstein's book “Holocaust Industry” in the First Things edition of December 1, 2000. Although Rubinstein believes

Finkelstein overestimated the motives behind the Holocaust manufacture activists. He besides criticized Finkelstein for his left-wing anti-Zionist assessment of the State of Israel. Regardless of any differences with Finkelstein, he full supports Finkelstein's critical stance on the planet judaic Congress

(WJC). He writes: “Despite the awesome name, WJC, founded in 1936, cannot be described as a typical body of the judaic people... Most critical sentences about the “Holocaust enterprise” avoid direct commentation based on the allegations Finkelstein has made against the World

Congress of Jews, most likely due to the fact that there is no right answer. Finkelstein accuses the WJC of acting like a pirate ship on the seas, hunting for spoils to extort a luck from European governments through the usage of the unique moral credibility of the Holocaust." Rubinstein continues: “After the war, the judaic community of up to 250 1000 people abruptly reappeared in Poland. Their property was actually confiscated by the communists, but not because

They were Jews, but due to the fact that they were capitalists. The property of non-Jewish capitalists was besides occupied. “I personally see no reason why the present Polish government should pay even 1 cent for erstwhile judaic property.”

Rubinstein then stresses the question of extortion: "It is hard to believe that a man of good will can support these demands. As a hebrew who lost his household in the Holocaust, I find them truly hideous. prof. Norman Finkelstein should be praised for this alternatively than condemned for exposing them.”

Jan Pzkis

(From English translated by Jan Saski)

Developed by Aleksander Szumański "Voice" Toronto No. 16 ; 19 – 25 04. 2017

P.S.

A well-known Polish historian Barbara Engelking – Boni, wife of TW “Znak” presented her book in Jerusalem in English entitled “Such a Beautiful Sunny Day” about... killing Jews by Polish peasants during the war.