SATURN 3
It's not a sajens fish...
And hell is here on earth
reprint
5 September 2024
Will AI destruct mankind?
reprint
5 September 2024
Will AI destruct mankind?
Prof. Zybertowicz on a script scarier than annihilation
(Source: YouTube/Rymanowski Live)
Is artificial intelligence (AI) a real threat to humanity? Are there “safers” that can defend us from the black screenplay? What can happen to us in connection with the improvement of the AI with Prof. Andrzej Zybertowicz, co-author of the book "AI Exploration" was discussed by Bogdan Rymanowski, on the YT channel "Rymanowski Live".
"Is it possible that at any point artificial intelligence will become more intelligent than humans and will consequence in the demolition of me and you?" asked Bogdan Rymanowski. In his reply, Prof. Zybertowicz noted that "very serious people let this possibility". He besides pointed out that for years among the experts in the field of AI there have been polls in this substance and they indicate that this black script allows 5-10% of respondents invariably.
Theoretically, it is simply a tiny number, but, as Prof. Zybertowicz pointed out, "if any Boening had an indicator of 5% of possible failure, they would never agree that it could take off". Among the skeptics are voices that set the AI's hazard indicators at 80%, or even above 99%, and are of the opinion that "if we want to behave rationally, the AI investigation should be stopped right now". They believe that “you gotta buy for humanity time to think, due to the fact that the current models are constructed in specified a way that they have no safety brake guarantees”.
"Rymanowski Live" besides considered how intelligent AI she is.
And right now, we besides encourage you to look at the full message by Prof. Zybertowicz, which he gave to PCh24.TV for the implementation of 2 of the latest episodes of our series “World Lords”:

Is artificial intelligence (AI) a real threat to humanity? Are there “safers” that can defend us from the black screenplay? What can happen to us in connection with the improvement of the AI with Prof. Andrzej Zybertowicz, co-author of the book "AI Exploration" was discussed by Bogdan Rymanowski, on the YT channel "Rymanowski Live".
"Is it possible that at any point artificial intelligence will become more intelligent than humans and will consequence in the demolition of me and you?" asked Bogdan Rymanowski. In his reply, Prof. Zybertowicz noted that "very serious people let this possibility". He besides pointed out that for years among the experts in the field of AI there have been polls in this substance and they indicate that this black script allows 5-10% of respondents invariably.
Theoretically, it is simply a tiny number, but, as Prof. Zybertowicz pointed out, "if any Boening had an indicator of 5% of possible failure, they would never agree that it could take off". Among the skeptics are voices that set the AI's hazard indicators at 80%, or even above 99%, and are of the opinion that "if we want to behave rationally, the AI investigation should be stopped right now". They believe that “you gotta buy for humanity time to think, due to the fact that the current models are constructed in specified a way that they have no safety brake guarantees”.
"Rymanowski Live" besides considered how intelligent AI she is.
– The problem is that professionals mostly regarded as the most prominent do not have a common line. any think that AI, that already present GPT-4 chat, has any symptoms of knowing the language – he noted. But others think it's complete nonsense. Prof. Zybertowicz here referred to the concept of "stochastic paper". “And now there is simply a question, if individual simulates that he has consciousness, how can we separate individual who simulates having consciousness from having consciousness?” the prof. asked. And he added, "the problem of awareness and even the problem of whether AI will be more intelligent than us is not the most important."
– We can imagine a strategy that is not conscious at all, which does not exceed the cognitive capabilities of man, but is more efficient than us in any field, in any aspect, specified as military games, in terms of manipulating financial markets, in terms of manipulating a man in any narrow section. My favourite argument is that you happened to be deceived by individual little intelligent, and that's cheating on your grandson, cheating to talk to the bank. Does a guy who plays 3 cards request to be more educated than who he cheats? Does he request a wider scope of competence and intelligence? Nope. He is only specialized in 1 thing, distracting and manipulating the man he plays with – he explained.
In mention to the AI, 1 can imagine specified a script that the AI “is going to evolve itself, or individual is going to train it for any aspect that in 1 year, in two, in three, from the point of view, for example, of the bio-diversity crisis, and this aspect of the AI will have mastered so that in this field it will manipulate us or accidentally mislead us”. “Let’s imagine that there will be any kind of climate destabilization and individual will say, here AI has the only solution that will let us to deal with it at this time, but individual will train it to fake data,” he added.
Rymanowski asked what is the darkest script that can, but does not have to, be fulfilled. Here, the prof. recalled the survey of Eliezer Judkowski, who believes that in addition to the hazard of AI's liquidation of humanity (whether intentionally or accidentally), there is simply a worse scenario. What? Prof. Zybertowicz stated that through genetic manipulations or another treatments that we do not really know about today, it would be possible to "upload human consciousness somewhere on the network". It would be a "transhumanist or posthumanist being trapped in a space of any suffering that he would not be able to come out of."
– Imagine that AI is developing, there's plenty, everyone has a private assistant, and abruptly it turns out that the richest people were able to upload to any virtual reality. In this way they gain immortality, due to the fact that they can be copied and copied forever, they can experience all the excitement that is associated with the energy of a young man and the refinement of a mature mind. And all of a sudden, here's a situation where any privileged group of people live in any realm of immortality and endless enjoyment. And at that point, it's a social movement that's due to everyone. Uploading is ok. No abortion is ok anymore, just uploading is ok and should be made available to everyone. And it turns out that if we master any fresh energy sources, possibly there'll be resources for that. And there's a large operation, at zero hour, we all put together, we don't leave anyone behind, so they're not better, worse, etc. And after this upload, it turns out that we are sentient beings who can experience joy, suffering, anxiety, excitement and anguish of loneliness, but we are incapacitated. We can't get out of this at all, and it turns out that we have a clean sense of being able to feel, due to the fact that we don't have the ability to contact anyone due to the mistake in the upload process. We are locked in an infinite torment of loneliness," said Prof. Zybertowicz.
The host of the program indicated it was discipline fiction. But as the prof. pointed out, the modern, real technologies that we usage were specified a invention a fewer years ago. “This is the technology that science, which is first fiction, turns into reality,” he added.
It should be noted that this imagination is different from discipline fiction: it is unrealistic in the sense of human image. "Uploading" of consciousness implies materialism, i.e. the anticipation of separating "consciousness" from a person, regardless of the fact that man is the laying of the soul and body. specified visions can only be conceived in the paradigm of neo-gnostic atheism, due to the fact that from a realistic Catholic position no "awatar of consciousness" would be human, so the situation which Prof. Zybertowicz talks about – closing in an infinite torment of loneliness – is simply impossible. Unless it's all about hell; but it doesn't take AI...
The conversation of Bogdan Rymanowski with Prof. Andrzej Zybertowicz "AI = enemy of humanity?" is available on the Rymanowski Live YT channel.
– We can imagine a strategy that is not conscious at all, which does not exceed the cognitive capabilities of man, but is more efficient than us in any field, in any aspect, specified as military games, in terms of manipulating financial markets, in terms of manipulating a man in any narrow section. My favourite argument is that you happened to be deceived by individual little intelligent, and that's cheating on your grandson, cheating to talk to the bank. Does a guy who plays 3 cards request to be more educated than who he cheats? Does he request a wider scope of competence and intelligence? Nope. He is only specialized in 1 thing, distracting and manipulating the man he plays with – he explained.
In mention to the AI, 1 can imagine specified a script that the AI “is going to evolve itself, or individual is going to train it for any aspect that in 1 year, in two, in three, from the point of view, for example, of the bio-diversity crisis, and this aspect of the AI will have mastered so that in this field it will manipulate us or accidentally mislead us”. “Let’s imagine that there will be any kind of climate destabilization and individual will say, here AI has the only solution that will let us to deal with it at this time, but individual will train it to fake data,” he added.
Rymanowski asked what is the darkest script that can, but does not have to, be fulfilled. Here, the prof. recalled the survey of Eliezer Judkowski, who believes that in addition to the hazard of AI's liquidation of humanity (whether intentionally or accidentally), there is simply a worse scenario. What? Prof. Zybertowicz stated that through genetic manipulations or another treatments that we do not really know about today, it would be possible to "upload human consciousness somewhere on the network". It would be a "transhumanist or posthumanist being trapped in a space of any suffering that he would not be able to come out of."
– Imagine that AI is developing, there's plenty, everyone has a private assistant, and abruptly it turns out that the richest people were able to upload to any virtual reality. In this way they gain immortality, due to the fact that they can be copied and copied forever, they can experience all the excitement that is associated with the energy of a young man and the refinement of a mature mind. And all of a sudden, here's a situation where any privileged group of people live in any realm of immortality and endless enjoyment. And at that point, it's a social movement that's due to everyone. Uploading is ok. No abortion is ok anymore, just uploading is ok and should be made available to everyone. And it turns out that if we master any fresh energy sources, possibly there'll be resources for that. And there's a large operation, at zero hour, we all put together, we don't leave anyone behind, so they're not better, worse, etc. And after this upload, it turns out that we are sentient beings who can experience joy, suffering, anxiety, excitement and anguish of loneliness, but we are incapacitated. We can't get out of this at all, and it turns out that we have a clean sense of being able to feel, due to the fact that we don't have the ability to contact anyone due to the mistake in the upload process. We are locked in an infinite torment of loneliness," said Prof. Zybertowicz.
The host of the program indicated it was discipline fiction. But as the prof. pointed out, the modern, real technologies that we usage were specified a invention a fewer years ago. “This is the technology that science, which is first fiction, turns into reality,” he added.
It should be noted that this imagination is different from discipline fiction: it is unrealistic in the sense of human image. "Uploading" of consciousness implies materialism, i.e. the anticipation of separating "consciousness" from a person, regardless of the fact that man is the laying of the soul and body. specified visions can only be conceived in the paradigm of neo-gnostic atheism, due to the fact that from a realistic Catholic position no "awatar of consciousness" would be human, so the situation which Prof. Zybertowicz talks about – closing in an infinite torment of loneliness – is simply impossible. Unless it's all about hell; but it doesn't take AI...
The conversation of Bogdan Rymanowski with Prof. Andrzej Zybertowicz "AI = enemy of humanity?" is available on the Rymanowski Live YT channel.
And right now, we besides encourage you to look at the full message by Prof. Zybertowicz, which he gave to PCh24.TV for the implementation of 2 of the latest episodes of our series “World Lords”:
Will AI destruct mankind? Prof. Zybertowicz on a script scarier than annihilation - PCH24.pl