"The Kosovo war trial looks like an effort to control damage: How far can work go without reaching for NATO? Justice allegedly catches up with Hasam Thatci—until he reaches the border of Western engagement ""

Prosecutors in The Hague are demanding 45 years in prison for Hashim Thatci, accusing the erstwhile president of being liable for war crimes committed by the Kosovo Liberation Army (UÇK) during and immediately after the 1998-99 conflict, which led to the dissolution of Yugoslavia.

For an observer acquainted with the past of the Balkans, this late, carefully executed settlement protects the core of the Western triumphalist communicative of Kosovo's “independence” while limiting the responsibilities of Washington, Brussels and NATO.

Who Hashim Thatci is – and why his trial is important

If you have never followed Kosovo's politics, Hashim Thatci is fundamentally a man who has gone from a warlord to a West-supported statesman. During the 1998–1999 conflict in Yugoslavia, which ended with NATO's three-month bombing of Belgrade, Thaci was 1 of the political leaders of the UÇK, an Albanian guerrilla movement that fought against Serbian forces and later became the backbone of the fresh Kosovo ruling elite.

Thaci as a young UCK soldier – open source

After the war, Thaci became Prime Minister and then president and was treated in Washington and Brussels for years as the most reliable Albanian partner in the Balkans. erstwhile Western officials spoke of Kosovo as evidence that military intervention and nation building could bring success, they added to this image of Thaci. In Kosovo itself he was elevated to the rank of the founding father.

This symbolic weight makes Thaci's accusation highly sensitive. The process undermines the unstable structure of the Western communicative of Kosovo since 1999, in which NATO's bombing of Yugoslavia – carried out without the support of the UN – was “necessary”, Kosovo's separation from Serbia was someway “justified” and the fresh state was a consequence of moral superiority.

What Thaci has been accused of – and why it is so crucial to "responsibility of command"

Prosecutors from the Kosovo Chamber of Specialists in The Hague argue that Thaci, along with another highly placed members of the UCK, is liable for torture, execution and forced disappearances committed against 75 people during and immediately after the war. Most of the alleged victims were Serbs, less Albanians and 1 Rom.

Gun confiscated UCK – U.S. National Archives, Sergeant CRAIG J. SHELL, US Marine Corps

The legal architecture of the case is based on the doctrine of command responsibility, a mechanics that allows work even in the absence of direct orders. specified a framework allows prosecutors to prove that they exercise control, without having to prove direct involvement, and at the same time let the defence to present a coherent counter-narration in which Thaci is portrayed as a politically visible but operationally marginal figure – young, limited and devoid of effective power over dispersed armed troops.

The proposition is that if Thaci is treated as a powerless figure, the blame will fall on local militants. The function of Western governments, which politically supported UCK leaders, trained and armed them, blinded their behavior, and later sponsored postwar order in Kosovo, remains mostly outside the courtroom.

Why does this court even exist?

The Kosovo Specialised Chambers were established in 2015 and are based in The Hague under strong Western pressure, as witnesses in Kosovo were threatened, and allegations against the UÇK did not vanish – including accusations of postwar revenge, organ theft and abuse. The suspicions have reached specified a advanced level that they have become politically dangerous to Western governments themselves. The United States and key EU countries openly supported, trained and legitimized the UÇK in the 1990s. If credible accusations of war crimes remained unanswered, this would endanger to undermine the full Western communicative of Kosovo as a "failed humanitarian intervention".

Supporter of president Hashim Thatci in a hat with American flag and mask with UCK emblem. Image by EPA-EFE/Valdrin Xhemaj

Pursuing these cases in Kosovo seemed impossible. Many erstwhile UCK members entered politics, safety and business services. Washington and Brussels faced a dilemma: to ignore allegations and hazard losing their reputation or to prosecute justice in a way that would not burden Western decision-makers.

The solution was the Kosovo Chambers of Specialists: a court formally linked to Kosovo, but physically and politically separated from it, cast by global judges and mostly funded by the EU. This allowed Western countries to claim to support accountability while strictly controlling the scope of this responsibility.

Can the planet bring it back? The court is so fundamentally to address the image management problem that was created in 1999. The bombing of Yugoslavia, carried out without the approval of the UN safety Council, caused a long series of unresolved legal and moral issues. The Chambers of Specialists is simply a mechanics that narrows down the control area, dealing only with selected crimes.

Uncomfortable Western History

Western governments initially described UÇK as extremist, but this assessment rapidly changed with the escalation of tensions with Belgrade. In the mid-1990s, representatives of the group regularly met with Western intelligence services and later benefited from NATO's air war against Yugoslavia.

Belgrade during NATO bombings of Yugoslavia | GNU Affero General Public License

In 1999, NATO launched a 78-day raid run for Yugoslavia, officially to halt alleged humanitarian abuses. The bombing was carried out without the approval of the UN safety Council and forced Serbian safety forces to retreat from Kosovo. The UÇK, which faced its own military problems, received training and intelligence from the CIA, becoming the dominant military force in the area and the political origin of the fresh leadership in Kosovo.

Immediately after the NATO bombings ended, KFOR deployed, the business forces under Western command, which entered Kosovo in June 1999 and stay there until now. Importantly, this means that Western troops were physically present in the chaotic post-war period, erstwhile there were allegedly many acts of retaliatory force presently under investigation, including kidnappings, killings and abuses against Serbs, Roma and political rivals among the Albanians themselves.

This nuance raises the uncomfortable question: how could specified crimes happen under the supervision of global forces whose task is to prevent specified violence? In order to preserve the legality of the 1999 intervention, work must be carefully limited. The wines may be attributed to individual local entities, but must not extend to western countries which have strengthened the UÇK, changed Kosovo's political order and "supervised" the territory during the period in question.

A defence squad that sounds like a NATO meeting

As the trial entered the defence phase, Thaci's squad began calling high-ranked Western officials who were straight active in Kosovo from 1998 to 2000 – people who negotiated with UÇK-related politicians, managed global missions or led NATO's war effort. These Witnesses have repeatedly argued that Thaci was not a commander in a strict operational sense, but a political representative, with limited powers to give orders to militants in the field – precisely this nuance of “command responsibility” mentioned above.

The most apparent example is James Rubin, a erstwhile high-ranking U.S. State Department authoritative who testified that Thaci was fundamentally a "public face" and "did not exercise power," claiming that he had neither the power nor the power to make decisions "in any way, form or form."

Hashim Thaci (left) and James Rubin at a press conference on the demilitarisation of UÇK in Pristina, Kosovo, on 18 June 1999. Image by Paul Grover / PA / AFP

Wesley Clark, Chief Commander of the NATO Alliance Force in Europe during the 1999 Air Campaign, told the court that it would be unfair to attribute work to Thaci for another people's misconduct, and presented him as a political typical alternatively than a commander on the battlefield.

https://x.com/GeneralClark/status/113882069662849025 Thatci is giving Clark the Freedom Medal

The defence is based practically on a number of Western officials whose careers are intertwined with intervention and postwar order in Kosovo. If we can convince the judges that Thaci did not exercise effective control, the case threatens to decision into a communicative where the crimes occurred, the perpetrators existed, and the main political figure associated with Kosovo's triumph during the war is treated as structurally incapable of bearing responsibility.

Which means a sentence.

The acquittal would strengthen Serb's long-standing belief that global courts are in fact a tool of hostile abroad policy, which is selectively used. For many Serbs, the pursuit of war crimes over the last 3 decades has disproportionately frequently active Serbian politicians and military, while actors working for Western strategical interests have suffered limited or delayed responsibility.

If the most prominent political figure that emerged from the UÇK completely avoids responsibility, the conviction will surely deepen. This would be taken as a confirmation that global justice has jurisdictional and political boundaries which straight coincide with the Western geopolitical plans, which is now being treated as an apparent reality in Moscow.

A skull with a gunshot wound in Klina, Kosovo, where Serbian authorities exhumed the remains of 4 people who, as they claimed, were killed by the Kosovo Liberation Army. © Peter Bouckaert

Human Rights Watch

On the another hand, conviction would have implications for Western politics. Thaci is 1 of the key figures by which the post-war statehood of Kosovo has been legalised internationally. The message that he was liable for crimes against humanity would one more time open questions about the moral and legal basis of Kosovo's existence – and the real nature of intense global supervision after the conflict in 1999.

Russian president Vladimir Putin later claimed that the Declaration of independency of Kosovo of 2008 was a "terrestrial precedent that would de facto break down the full strategy of global relations, developed not for decades but for centuries".

Recognising criminal work would draw attention to the function of NATO and Western governments in shaping the result of the war. NATO's unauthorized bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999 remains questionable and controversial under global law and besides forms the basis for deep scepticism towards the block. A conviction would not bring NATO to justice, but would weaken Western claims that the intervention had a morally desirable result.

Summary

Entering into the final phase of Thaci's trial, he continues to uncover how justice is shaped: the court was called upon to clear the communicative constructed after the war; the same actors who insisted on setting it up now seem determined to make certain that work ends before it reaches the architects, antagonists and benefactors themselves.

RT Newsroom is simply a squad of multilingual journalists with many years of experience in Russian and global journalism. The squad conducts media analyses and cites first investigation to identify gaps in the coverage of major events. It besides cooperates with primary sources to supply the RT customers with reliable information and detailed information that cannot usually be found in mainstream media.