The German Empire (order 66) is formed

Piotr Grochmalski

German Annihilation Plan of Poland
by - independent.pl




On Friday, March 21, so just a day after Tusk's squad openly supported German interests and betrayed the Polish state's right, the bodnarists charged erstwhile Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defence Mariusz Błaszczak. The government on 13 December accused him of revealing in 2023 that Tusk's then squad wanted to give Russia practically without fighting east Poland until the Vistula line. In the case of aggression, the FR meant vulnerability to certain deaths or occupations of millions of people. It was a shocking act, violating Articles 5 and 26 of the Polish Constitution. But Poles have no right to know this truth.

Shockingly, this time Tusk goes much further in the betrayal of national security, pushing the EU resolution. Unless Jaruzelski could completely free himself from his faithful service to the Kremlin, Tusk sold his soul to Berlin. Today, thanks to the German protective umbrella over his crew, he is conducting a coup in Poland at an accelerated rate. Germany strives to marginalize and weaken the Republic, and the squad on 13 December has approval from Berlin even to utmost brutal methods.

Without the US in NATO

However, example III of the Polish Republic shows the goals of the political-business elite of Germany. On the day precisely erstwhile the government on 13 December in practice supported German ambitions and plans in the Sejm to subordinate Berlin to the safety of the Old Continent, the Financial Times published an article indicating that "Europe would like to push the US out of NATO". This British diary claims that Germany, France, large Britain and the Nordic countries are secretly developing a plan to replace the US with NATO.

According to the magazine, “There are 80,000 American soldiers stationed in Europe. (...) It takes about 5 to 10 years of increased spending to rise European capacities to a level at which they could replace most of the US's competences, but for American atomic deterrence."

These plans for Europe to take over NATO are to be handed over to Trump at the closest June summit of the Alliance in The Hague. According to a letter from the European NATO officials, “they claim that maintaining the Alliance with little or no United States engagement would be much simpler than creating a fresh structure.” It is said that in this behind-the-clock game, which is intended to lead to the actual takeover of the European NATO structures by Berlin, Paris and London, there is no mention of Warsaw, Bucharest, Vilnius, Riga or Tallinn, the countries of the east flank of the Alliance, the most threatened by Russia. Trump, already in his first term, rightly acknowledged that Germany was trying to undermine the position of the US in Europe. And they do it together with Putin. Together they besides play to weaken Poland's position.

Alexander Dugin, a prokremlian Russian geopoliticist, had many supporters in the FRN, noted that "The maximum weakening of Poland is the foundation of Russian-German relations. interior and external antagonisms are in the interests of the abovementioned neighbours. The Polish-Ukrainian conflict, tensioned relations with Lithuanians and feuds between political forces in Poland themselves are part of the Polish “softening” scenario..

Both Berlin and Moscow, until the pro-German Tusk squad was installed in Warsaw, likewise assessed Poland's peculiar strategical importance for the US, and thus the threat to their interests. Dugin, who stressed that pro-American Poland is the most crucial component of Atlantic geopolitics, expressed this strongly. And Trump made her, as early as his first term, a strong anchor in the transatlantic relation between the US and Europe.

What are the Germans playing? Shocking document

The European Parliament's full defence resolution is an astounding document. He's already shocking his preamble. It is primarily ideological and conceals the work of France and Germany for their active pro-Russian policy. For this Minsk II negotiations, led by these states with Russia, created the ground under Putin's aggression in 2022.. And now suddenly, in the 4th year of the war, Berlin and Paris, which played a major function in working on key elements of the resolution, convince in the preamble (point A) that the hybrid war (which began towards Poland in 2021) and the war in Ukraine require

It is worth recalling that the Germans effectively blocked KPO for Poland, and thus Poland's weakness was considered more crucial than strengthening the state, which assumed the main burden of defending the east flank of NATO and supporting Ukraine. Moreover, German business sent petitions to Scholz, a continuationist of Merkel's policy, to get Poland to receive funds for KPO due to the fact that it hit these companies, as more than 85 percent of these funds would go to German companies. So this decision besides hit the FRN economically.

But Germany felt that it was even more damaging to Polish economics and weakening its potential. After Berlin pushed the Tusk teams in Warsaw, slowing down our economy, and besides breaking down key infrastructure projects, incompatible with Berlin's interests, became a regular squad practice on 13 December. Almost all component of the preamble shows how lethal Berlin's current and current policy has been for EU security, which abruptly creates mass anti-Americanism combined with supporting the coup in Poland, a key country for European safety on the east flank of NATO. And these actions are aimed at groups and environments that have for years warned against the Russian threat and were so very aggressively attacked by the German elite and the media of that country.

But now, according to the preamble, the S-point must be centralised "defensive capacity", which "requires a common strategical culture and a shared perception and assessment of risks". The alleged responsibility that the EU acted poorly in the defence sphere is due to this (point T),

"that the EU has repeatedly been incapable to take decisive action in consequence to external threats due to the request of unanimity and that any associate States and candidate countries have blocked or delayed key military assistance for Ukraine and thus undermined European security". In another words, they must be deprived of their Treaty right to decide their security. And the expected remedy for this is included in regulation 66 of the Resolution, key to the interests of Berlin and Paris. Europarliament calls for a fast establishment

Berlin and Paris so want to deprive the state of the right of veto in fundamental matters for their sovereign existence. The mechanics of a double qualified majority (55% of countries and 65% of the EU population) gives full power in practice to Germany and France to push through specified solutions that will let the funds of another countries to rebuild the German economy and make imperial and military power from Berlin, which will lead to the suppression of another countries, including Poland. The population of Germany, France and the Netherlands is almost 38% of the EU population. Therefore, they have a majority, effectively blocking all solutions that are unfavourable to them. This mechanics will shortly lead to a fast accumulation of force in the hands of Berlin and Paris. In the name of anti-American hysteria, Tusk wants to put a German noose around Poles' neck. president Lech Kaczyński, shortly before Smolensk, emphasized what, in fact, this mechanics of double qualified majority is: "...In practice, our situation will be akin to almost all EU countries – but Germany. due to the fact that on the fresh voting system, everyone's gonna lose, but them. And they all agreed to it anyway."

Under Berlin's shoe

This mechanism, after Britain's departure from the Union, is working even more to strengthen Germany and gradually but systematically and increasingly to accumulate power over Europe in Berlin's hands. Until now, veto has defended states in the defence sphere in order not to prosecute German interests. Yet Berlin is liable for a series of gigantic disasters that the EU has experienced. Berlin alone is the biggest threat to the EU.

When we entered the EU in 2004, its full GDP was $11.4 trillion versus $12.22 trillion, so the Union had 93% of US GDP. The Union was to strengthen economically all countries, giving them, through a common market, a powerful impetus for development. Today, after more than 2 decades, the United States has escaped us cosmically. With GDP of $30.3 trillion versus $20.3 trillion, we are barely 67% of the possible of the American economy. It's a chasm.

The Germans were pushing the Union into further disasters. But there was another phenomenon: the comparatively German economy grew at the expense of another EU economies. While in 2004, it accounted for 25% of EU economics, in 2024 it is almost 30%, which is almost 1/3.

We are so dealing with hidden cannibalisation, feeding on the economical possible of another countries. Germany is becoming dangerous, spreading, destroying the full EU system, transforming it into Berlin's hidden hegemony. Veto is the only mechanics to halt Germany from pushing their highly dangerous actions and ideas. An example of the KPO shows how they usage their power in the Union to destruct competitive economies and states that do not want to comply with the fresh dictatorship of Berlin.

Point 66. Berlin is insisting that, in terms of safety and defence, the mechanics of a double qualified majority should in practice cover all EU institutions. Which means in broad daylight, without 1 shot, without 1 concentration camp, Germany would become masters of the life and death of the Polish state and its citizens.


Let us remind you that General Carsten Breuer, head of the German Bundeswehr, had already stated in April 2024 that "Germany takes work for NATO's east flank". Tusk's silence confirmed this fact. And this could mean that Tusk had already made a secret deal with Germany about it. Donald Trump's triumph overturned German calculations. He does not like specified actions of Berlin and Tusk's crew to put Poland's safety in the hands of Germany.

Germany is preparing a fresh hecatomb for Europe

The resolution is soaked in German shoes. The key passage of the document, entitled “Coherence and sovereignty”, clearly opens the way for the EU to be converted into a German empire. Berlin is attempting to repeat elements of Bismarck's strategy, thanks to which Prussia broke the opposition of German states, took control of the German component and built the Second Reich. Under the pretext of alleged strengthening the EU, it is intended, on an illegal, out-of-the-art basis, to force countries to hand over the key to their existence – due to the fact that the sphere of safety and defence is fundamental to their sovereign existence.

The resolution demands that it happen with quantum velocity – we are talking openly about quantum leap. According to the resolution, the Common safety and Defence Policy (CSDP) is to become an instrument for power and security. Thus, at a fast pace, the structure controlled by Berlin, which is competitive to NATO, is to be built. This will destruct the current safety system, which effectively defended Europe during the Cold War, erstwhile the russian Union was highly stronger than the present Russia, and its scope reached east Berlin and half of Germany. Everything is intended primarily to service German ambitions.

As we read in paragraph 10,

The implementation of this plan will blow up NATO and thus push the US out of Europe. It is intended to prevent any country, including Poland, from building strong bilateral relations with the United States. This will be impossible, due to the fact that it will require the consent of Berlin and Paris. The very creation of this paper is simply a revelation of sick ambition Germany to take over, through CSDP, the control of states. We remember how brutally Berlin fought against Poland in all dimensions until the pro-German Hunwajbins were installed in Warsaw, fanatically hating Polish patriots. This plan to take distant their most crucial attribute of sovereignty from the countries is intended to make the EU a "reliable power and a European pillar of NATO".In order to carry out these sick ambitions of Berlin, it is essential that the Ukrainian war continues. It is essential for the German industry. [Ukraine is now - and from the very beginning in the 19th century - "the economical and political branch of Germany" - MS]

As with inexpensive energy from Russia, German business wanted to conquer the EU economically, so now the arms industry, which will receive immense resources from the EU to save the German economy, which is in deep crisis. It is not surprising, therefore, that following the adoption of the resolution, the German Bundesrat agreed to abolish budgetary constraints on defence spending. This will origin Germany to increase its arms spending to EUR 400 billion. The Chinese planned $245 billion for this intent in 2025.

The strategical goal of Moscow and Berlin – to break NATO

When the North Atlantic Alliance was formed, it was not only to guarantee Europe's safety from Russia by the presence of US forces on the Old Continent, but he was besides to keep Germany under his shoe so that the "German question" was not reborn.

For Berlin, it is understandable that in order for Germany to full dominate and subdue the Old Continent, it must push the US out of Europe. That is why, today, Berlin is so determined to support the actions to accomplish this objective. German elites are besides heavy camouflaged in articulateting their strategy. It's hard to tell Dugin. That's 1 of the reasons he's very popular with the West Germany. As he emphasized: "Destroying NATO and pushing the U.S. out of Europe will consequence in a slow “finalization” of the Old Continent and automatic expulsion of the US from the European sphere of influence. This can be achieved through war or intelligent and consistent support for any separatist tendencies towards the US in Europe."

And Germany is the most anti-American society on the Old Continent. Dugin thinks “The hegemon of Europe should be Germany, with which Russia should communicate... due to the anticipation of building fresh geopolitical architecture on the Old Continent. (...) For the Moscow–Berlin alliance, a fresh border must be set to avoid conflicts in the future. Countries created by the Treaty of Versailles and which have become a “sanitary cordon” separating Russia from Europe and, above all, Germany, should be dismantled, which will cease to endanger interference on these soils of undesirable 3rd countries. specified separation must aim at both Russian and German interests. (...) We, Russians and Germans, reason in the concepts of expansion and will never think otherwise. We are not just curious in preserving our own state or nation."

German European Reich

When March 10, 1952 Stalin abruptly appeared to the United States with the Peace Note on Germany, Washington remained vigilant. The russian Union after 1945 was convinced that it would rapidly destabilize those parts of Germany that were occupied by the US, France and the UK. Britain. In June 1948, the Soviets ordered the first blockade of West Berlin. erstwhile it failed, Stalin went to apparent concessions. He proposed to unite Germany if the West accepted the neutrality of the recently created state. Kissinger states that "If Stalin had made a akin initiative 4 years earlier, before the blockade of Berlin, the Czech coup and the Korean War, he would surely have stopped Germany's admission to NATO. In fact, it would be rather possible that the German membership of the Atlantic Alliance would never be considered."

It was in 1952 that the business states granted Western Germany sovereignty. Adenauer was elected Chancellor of Germany. As Kissinger notes: "The secret parliamentary elections gave him triumph by a majority of only 1 vote (probably his own) and the opposition Social Democratic Party, entirely democratically, demanded unification alternatively than alliance with the West".

Three years later, in 1955, Adenauer introduced Germany to NATO. erstwhile Germany was headed by Social politician Willy Brandt in 1969, he placed first, at the expense of his relation with the US, close-up with russian Russia, which would lead to the unification of Germany and open the way to the revival of their power. Since then, pro-Russianism has become the foundation of German politics.

In 2012, Ulrich Beck wrote the book “Das deutche Europa. Neue Machtlandschaften im Zeichen der Krise", which later appeared in the technological Publishing home of PWN ("German Europe". fresh landscapes of power marked by crisis). The main thesis, which the author has preached, is simply a message which is already included in the preceding statement: "Everyone knows it, but saying it loudly means breaking taboo: Europe has become German".

And in 2015, Hans Kundnani published the "Paradox of the German Power", where he stated that the re-emergence of the "German Question" meant the destabilisation of European policy.

President Lech Kaczyński, shortly before his death, noted that "Our competition in the Union is in a way playing for sovereignty towards German policy".