Just a look at events in the last fewer years, to see what way the inhabitants of the Western planet are following, including Poland. Each specified message, separately, gives emergence to fear, and combined together, shows the strength of an ongoing massive leftist attack, anti-human ideology, rightly called "anti-civilization of death."
July 23, 2024. Warsaw. A tiny but noisy assembly was gathered under the Sejm – the flags “Polish grandmothers”, “Women’s Strike”, etc., are flying. A young girl speaks on stage, utilizing vulgar words that are more or little such: I had an abortion, and what are you gonna do to me? On 11 July 2024 in the Sejm, associate of the civilian Coalition, Franciszek Sterczewski stated: It is time to say plainly: helping with abortion is simply a good thing. In 2024 French parliamentarians decided to put abortion in their constitution by crushing the majority of the votes, which means that the "right-wing" MEPs besides voted in favour of this solution. In 2021, the European Parliament in its resolution recognised abortion as a human right and criticised the conscience clause of doctors. Since 2022, the WHO has recommended the removal of political barriers to "safe" abortion, calls for its decriminalisation, and even suggests broad facilitation of access to it, including abortion tablets, besides through telemedicine.
In March 2023, the Federation's pro-abortion foundation "restricted" the position of the Polish Ombudsman of Patient Rights on the designation of a woman's intellectual wellness threat as a condition for legal abortion. In December 2023 president Andrzej Duda signed a bill providing public backing for the ethically controversial procedure of in vitro fertilization, condemning any people in the embryonic phase of life to ‘disposal’ or remaining frozen, without a chance of development. In 2024, the Polish Sejm allowed 15-year-olds to buy ‘day after’ tablets without a prescription – these measures may have abortive effects. In 2024, during the abortion debate, the doctor performing specified treatments called the kid in the womb a ‘parasitic parasite’, and in another program, the proaborative activist ostentatiously and demonstrationally swallowed an ‘on vision’ early-poron tablet. In June 2024, the regulation of the Minister of wellness of Isabella Lestiny came into force, ignoring the clause of conscience and forcing on hospitals, under the threat of severe financial consequences, the work to employment an aborter.
Minister Leschina in a July 2024 interview stated that she prefers women to have abortions up to 12 weeks of pregnancy, “when the fetus is not yet feeling” than had already been abused by a kid born (she so recognized that those capable of abortion, if they neglect to execute it, would abuse the born children?). In March 2024, there was a tragic confusion of patients at the Prague University infirmary in the Czech Republic, resulting in the removal of a healthy woman's kid in the 4th period of pregnancy who came for a check-in. In 2017, the Sarco capsule was invented for independent euthanasia, which can be printed for itself in 3D technology. In February 2024, a Dutch Catholic activist (!!!) of the People's organization (KVP) and the Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA), erstwhile Dutch Prime Minister Dries van Agt, together with his wife submitted euthanasia...
These are just any facts from the past fewer years indicating the way that the inhabitants of the Western planet are following, including Poland. Each specified message, separately, gives emergence to fear, and combined together, shows the strength of a massive leftist attack, a dehumanized ideology on eternal values. Conservative users of portal X commenting on the behaviour of pro-abortion and progressive “Julek” and the aged abortion aids write: “Come!” while the Catholic teaching must take hold of the head – where is this planet going? Why do we want to feed Moloch? Are we inactive human, or have we become the lowest instinct, selfish beasts?
There's good news. In the Sejm, the first of respective notified projects liberalising abortion law was successfully rejected. Thank you, Lord God, for the people who prayed the rosary in this intention! The very modest attendance at the aforementioned demonstration of abortion activists gives hope that, contrary to the surveys, the views of the organizers are actually shared by a number of Polish citizens. In addition, the reactions to the rude behaviour of pro-choice promoters were highly unfavorable, even on the left side of the abortion barricade, and this year's marches for Life gathered crowds of participants.
Non-statutory regulations
However, the situation is inactive dangerous. We are observing continuous attempts to change the legal basis for abortion and mitigate criminal liability for its perpetrators – in the Sejm we are waiting for 3 further draft laws liberalising abortion, and the rejected task is to be recommissioned. Furthermore, the current government is determined to introduce inhuman abortion solutions, even without the legislative procedures of the Sejm and the applicable laws.
The article of 26 July 2024 published on medexpress.pl reads: On Thursday, wellness Minister Izabel Leszczyn informed that, at the request of Prime Minister Donald Tusk, he was developing with Minister of Justice Adam Bodnar standards for abortion activities that would guarantee the safety of women while not requiring statutory changes. “We are gathering with lawyers and doctors in the coming days to work out something else that will let women who do not want to, cannot, do not feel able for various reasons to be mothers, so that by 12 weeks of pregnancy they can legally make the word of pregnancy. We have 2 reasons to do so – she announced, rather enigmatically, Leszczyna. Previously, the media reported that prosecutors had been given guidance to lead abortion aid cases towards the termination of proceedings.
Changing Philosophy
On the website of the Chancellery of the president of the Council of Ministers on 30 August 2024, it was announced that Justice and wellness Resorts have provided peculiar guidelines on abortion for the prosecution and hospitals. Among another things, it was clearly indicated that abortion due to a woman's intellectual wellness is acceptable and 1 doctor's opinion suffices. According to Prime Minister Tusk, guidelines for prosecutors and hospitals will change the application of current abortion laws: We are looking for ways to act that will legally let access to legal abortion for women who, for various reasons, should have the right. Minister Leschina stated: If a second doctor’s ruling or consumption is requested by the medicinal entity, this should be considered as obstructing access to the medical procedure which is in the guaranteed benefit basket.Minister Bodnar added on the issue of intellectual health: This is simply a fact that is legally permissible. In specified situations, it should not affect the prosecution. The point is to change the atmosphere and doctrine of action. Women's rights must be in the center, not the another way around.
The guidelines besides propose that a doctor may not benefit from a clause of conscience if a hold in the provision of medical assistance could consequence in the failure of a woman's life, injury to her body or "a severe wellness disorder".
What about human dignity?
In an interview with RMF FM on September 3, 2024, Prof. Andrzej Zoll of the Jagiellonian University said that the presented government guidelines on abortion do not take into account the answer to the question of the position of the fetus – whether it is simply a developing man or a future man. The lawyer recalled that the Court of Justice of the European Union recognised in 2011 that all embryo has human dignity. It follows that we are dealing with a developing man here, so an component that has human dignity and value.Of course, abortion must be permitted in certain situations – erstwhile we have a collision of the good of a developing man and of a good woman – said the prof. (rmf24.pl). However, he added that it was a female whose life is seriously threatened who has the right to decide whose life is to be saved first – her or the child, and the fresh directives completely ignore these issues.
Prof. Zoll besides believes that the guidelines prohibiting the re-consultation of the conditions for abortion, as previously identified by another doctor, interfere with the rights of a doctor to execute a ‘procurement’ which must first examine the patient. The guidelines do not let to check whether the conditions indicated by another doctor are correct.
– If Minister Lestin now points out that 1 certificate of the specialist and the doctor who is to have an abortion is sufficient, he must do so after examination of the patient, he cannot do so “on the run”, then his opinion must besides be taken into account. He may completely disagree with this diagnosis, or the message contained in the certificate which is to licence abortion. [...] An abortion doctor must not be completely deprived of his subjectivity and failing to respect his medical knowledge. due to the fact that he can say that the certificate does not reflect the real state. Omission of this, already imposing sanctions erstwhile a doctor refuses to have an abortion due to the fact that he does not agree with the position of the individual issuing the certificate, that is unacceptable to me. – concluded Prof. Zoll.
During this conversation ed. Terlikowski pointed out that in the guidelines presented there are no references to human life or embryo at all – only the ‘woman question’ is taken into account. The speakers besides mentioned that the Ministry of wellness in its directives claims that abortion can be performed at any phase of pregnancy, and that they have not been dealt with at all erstwhile a surviving child, capable of surviving, is born in late abortions.
Murderous Pressures
Kamila Ferenc, a lawyer from the Foundation for Women and household Planning, stated in an interview with Monika Khrushińska- Dragan (Article Abortion with a doctor's certificate even from a telepora. An abortion? “This is absurd” Published on the portal marketzdrowia.pl), that The Foundation was very keen on the guidelines, so a fewer months ago, its activists submitted to the Ministry of wellness a text they developed together with attachments and insisted on their adoption for respective months. [...] In experience, we know that doctors are only affected by power. Guidelines are needed to halt the illegal practices of hospitals towards patients. They will no longer be able to claim that "this is the law" due to the fact that they have just received its summary from the ministry itself. It will make it easier for us and the patients to enforce their wellness benefits – said Ferenc.
The article besides states: Kamila Ferenc besides believes that we will not escape from the change in abortion law in Poland. We are required to do so by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination of Women (CEDAW) in its recommendations of 21 August 2024. "The Committee believes that abortion should be legalised without having to state the reason, decriminalisation of abortion aid, and as a temporary measurement before the abovementioned law is adopted – a moratorium on the application of criminal law to the prosecution of abortion aid. Only specified changes will put an end to the humiliating treatment of women," she notes.
In August 2024, the Federation published its comment on the State lawyer General's latest guidelines for conducting abortion aid proceedings. The "progressive" organisation considered them besides conservative, and thus disappointing, although the thought of specified guidelines itself is appreciated by it. The Federation has prepared its own ‘social’ guidelines, which states: Although the D.A. suggests that the actions should be primarily guided by the well-being of women, there is inactive a hazard that conservative prosecutors, including those installed in the time of the Law and Justice, will be guided not by superiors but by their utmost anti-abortion attitude. [...] First of all, we urge that, in situations where the expected assistance in desired voluntary abortion is involved, prosecutors refuse to initiate proceedings from the outset due to the negligible social harm of the action
"Innocuous" means ... okay?
Such a message exposes the views of pro-abortionists who consider the interruption of human life to be an act of “minor” harm. It is worth recalling in this context an interesting analysis of Katarzyna Doroszewski The social harm of an act as a word of evil in Polish criminal law? published in the quarterly of the PhD students of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of the Faculty of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of the Faculty of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Faculty of the
An crucial aspect of criminal law is criticism of harmful acts, and Polish law does so utilizing the "social harm" clause. The question is what is considered evil in Polish law and what factors find it. [...] The Codification Commission, which operated during the years of systemic transformation, has decided to take into account the formal and substantive offences which constitute Article 1 of the Criminal Code in force today. The first paragraph of this Article provides for a formal part of the definition ('criminal liability' is subject to only 1 who commits a criminal offence under a law in force at the time of his or her execution'), whereas in the second paragraph, the material part is not a criminal offence whose social harm is negligible. This means that the concept of "social harm" is intended to constitute the criterion according to which action is assessed for harm. [...] The introduction of the concept of social harm had crucial consequences for the application of the law. Not only does he decide on the existence of a criminal offence, but he besides indirectly determines the amount of the punishment imposed on the perpetrator of the criminal offence. The rules on the assessment of social harm are addressed mainly to the court but besides to the prosecutor. The importance of this assessment relates primarily to the determination of the amount of the penalty, but besides to the institution of conditional withdrawal from the execution of the punishment or conditional remission of the criminal proceedings. [...] The lexical importance of the concept of social harm prima facie does not give emergence to much doubt. This is simply a feature of an act that means that an act causes harm, harm or otherwise violates social order. In this case, the adjective “social” is not limited to any extent, there are no references to Polish citizens or residents of a given region or even witnesses of an event. Apart from the definition of society, it can be considered that, according to the penal code, it will be the largest possible group of people affected by the perpetrator. However, this approach raises any doubts due to the fact that it inactive does not explain precisely what criteria are to be met by a socially harmful act. As Mr Derlatka points out, linguistic explanation leads to the inclusion of social harmfulness as a feature of the act determining the violation of the legal right, interest of an individual or society. This characteristic is linked to its negative consequences and so to the harm suffered by 1 or more persons.
Thus, if the rule of "social harm" is utilized to measure the harm done by the act, abortion is simply a socially harmful act. It violates the interests of individuals and does harm by, among another things, taking distant the conception of man's rights, (especially, of course, the right to life), taking the rights of individual members of his family, exposing and kid and household to suffering. Abortion besides violates the interests of society, which loses the value of gaining a citizen – possibly outstanding, loses a future worker or entrepreneur, a support for the wellness and pension system. Abortion is besides about deepening the phenomenon of depopulation, violating social order, encouraging promiscuity, giving a morally and socially incorrect example to the environment, and breaking the law. All these elements are unfavorable for individuals and societies.
The claim of the activists of the Federation that the act of abortion has small social harm suggests that there is no harm to 1 individual due to it, of course, it is simply a lie, since the most apparent harm is suffered by the victim of abortion, or man in the early phase of his development. This failure of life is an irreparable deprivation of man's top temporal value. According to the reasoning cited above, abortion is simply a crime, a phenomenon that the state should fight and punish. In this context, the attitude of the rulers, who, alternatively of introducing solutions to support families welcoming sick or disabled children in the world, like to advance attitudes not only morally reprehensible, but aiming in the long word to destruct society by allowing the killing of children – their own citizens (including healthy children, due to the fact that these guidelines aim to do so). The government supporting pro-abortion attitudes does not work for the benefit of the community and the individuals it is intended to help, but is simply a slave to the worldview, in which delaying or giving up motherhood is simply a sign of “progress, success and freedom”.
I allow, of course, the anticipation that the issue of abortion is utilized by politicians as a tool for polarising the nation, distracting from another crucial matters. This may be the case, but it does not change the fact that bloody abortion guidelines have been prepared, presented and will most likely be enforced by the government. Officials who have dealt with it receive a wage from taxes paid by the society, which will soon, among another things, be reduced in numbers. No another political, economical or financial issues can be more crucial than the innocent slaughter that we see unleashing before us.
Destructive ‘I’
Some people want to kill their own kid or they don't want to live on. There are different reasons for specified desires and destructive intentions – sometimes they are caused by intellectual disorders, overwhelming feelings of helplessness and loneliness. There are, of course, dramatic situations in which, for example, the life of the parent is threatened, or there are deadly genetic complications and structures developing in the womb yet do not become a human organism.
Such situations happen and both pro-life activists and the Catholic Church do not deny this state of affairs. They benefit from the achievements of discipline and are aware that the number of possible complications of pregnancy and abnormalities at the phase of embryonic and foetal life is considerable, and can result, of course, in the death of the embryo, the death of the fetus, or, for example, in the improvement of life-threatening and health-threatening snowmen. no of the proliferators call for “killing mothers” but for not killing children on the basis of an unprecise “probability” or just “suspecting” of a child’s illness with which it is possible to live, and not killing children due to “the low temper of the mother” – the temper can improve, and the child’s life will not return, as Kaja Godek rightly pointed out.
However, the abortion lobby demands the right to execution children besides “on demand”, without giving a reason. This is evidenced by the fact that late made available without a prescription for 15-year-old girls ‘day after’ pills do not give a chance at any examination of the embryo's condition or mother's examination, yet specified measures may have early-onset effects. Furthermore, abortion activist Natalia Broniarczyk in the debate on the portal “Goniec” admitted that unborn are children, but this fact does not substance to her.
In the pro-abortion world, the conditions mentioned in Polish law are irrelevant, and the aspect of eternal life, soul, baptism, the destiny of the kid after death, the conscience of the mother, or the full spectrum of ethical issues related to pregnancy, is completely ignored. Single dramatic cases of death of pregnant women who have not been able to/have been able to save or have been mistaken in their treatment are utilized propaganda to enhance support for the pro-abortion movement. So these are not situations specified as the suspected fatal illness of the conceived kid or the threat of the mother's life are the origin of mass abortion. It is besides not rape, which, according to the statistic provided by the Ministry of Health, is liable for the “following” amount of unwanted pregnancies. Many decisions about ending a pregnancy in reality are made for reasons that, compared to “life” are simply trivial and usually fall into the category “egozim” (my professional career, my comfort, I want to decide, my body, etc.). The “priority of substance over spirit” wins—the pursuit of physical comfort, the focus on one's own pleasance and material considerations stifling moral law.
"Healed" from pregnancy?
Even authoritative abortions in government statistic can have a "stretched" legal basis. The number of abortions, according to data published by the Ministry of Health, was 425 in 2023, the vast majority of which was made due to a threat to the life or wellness of the mother. This means a three-fold increase in abortion from a wellness condition compared to 2022 and 12 times compared to earlier years (2012-2021)!
These are data from the PiS period of rule, and since the current government openly supports pro-abortion efforts, the number of abortions may increase considerably. The “mental wellness hazard” message, which is hard to verify, is frequently used, especially in the infirmary in Oleśnica. any of the children were killed in this infirmary during the 3rd trimester of pregnancy!
Jerzy Kwaśniewski, president of the Institute, described the Oleśnicki process on the Ordo Iuris website: Of the 144 abortions carried out in 2023, 139 were carried out due to the alleged threat of “mental health” of a woman. Defenders of life, whom we have been defending from Polish courts for years, have asked the infirmary to clarify this information. It turned out that these "serious intellectual wellness threats" were "adaptative disorders". This means 1 thing – in Oleśnica abortions are made on request. With complete inactivity and with silent approval from the authorities.
It is worth noting that these adaptation disorders are a natural reaction of any people to a stressful situation specified as moving, financial problems, matrimony or the birth of a child. They can pass alone, or they can be treated, even with psychotherapy. Under no circumstances is simply a stressful situation, the way to adapt to a life situation is not to kill a person. Can you imagine individual killing others due to the fact that they lost their occupation or moved away? We would consider specified a individual a psychopath or a dangerous lunatic to be isolated from society. During pregnancy, however, an argument for adaptation disorders is reached. There are doctors who, by their authority and name, sign on to this diagnosis.
Zbigniew Kaliszuk of the Proelio Group Foundation stated: Abortion organizations already have an organized group of psychiatrists ready to issue draft certificates. They can be obtained within 1 teleporade (eKai.pl). The Foundation for Women and Planning of the Feder's household (whose lawyers complained about the infirmary in Pabianice for refusing abortion) in 2021 formed a base for "friendly patients of gynecologists and gynaecologists" – friendly, i.e. most likely knowing "reproductive needs" of "cis-woman" as well as transgender/infinite persons utilizing gynaecological services".
The law enforcement apparatus pretends not to see the absurdity of the explanation of "adaptative disorders", papers agree, a tiny man dies "in the majesty of the law" by his own parent and people educated for taxpayers' money on doctors to save lives and health. The horror of this is shocking.
The abortion lobby and its favorable officials and politicians have their methods – technological findings are ignored, medical definitions are changed, illegal recommendations are made to doctors and prosecutors, distorts the sense of the first provisions of global law in an effort to interpret them in a manner consistent with the left-wing agenda, which they effectively "catch" and emphasize, among others, the lawyers of Ordo Iuris. The abortion door can besides be changed late by the Sejm's definition of rape. As Kaja Godek from the Life and household Foundation mentioned in the entry on the X portal, it is adequate to supply a certificate from the prosecutor about the ongoing rape proceedings – no 1 will wait with a "procurement" to complete this procedure or a possible trial.
True Reasons
During the abortion debate organised by the portal “Goniec” on 18 July 2024, 1 of the calling proabortion activists shocked the mentality of those seeking abortions and the actual reasons why abortion is needed for any people – after writing out “unquote” passages, this message was as follows: What I say to people who study to me, who are afraid of being pregnant, who are utilizing 2 contraceptives at erstwhile and inactive have an intermittent relationship, I tell them then, you have nothing to fear, you do not deserve that fear. We deserve safe sex, happy sex [...] and I would like to tell all the girls who perceive to it: [...] you have the right to as many partners as you want, you have the right to hang out, and you don't gotta explain erstwhile you drop by and compose to me that you request abortion. I'm not gonna charge you, I'm just gonna ask you what week you're in.
Natalia Broniarczyk of the Abortive Dream squad in an interview with Onet in 2022 indicated which people are most likely to search abortion: These are, for example, women who live in a violent relation or from specified a relation have just left and have a feeling that there is any destiny over them. And besides those in financial distress in which they found themselves in a pandemic having difficulty keeping a family. We are besides approached by young women, who have just started studying or in a relation that takes very short time and they know that this is not the time for a child. The same article besides states: Abortive Dream squad late released a graphics with the slogan: “Throw it if it is against abortion”. due to the fact that there are more and more people who are afraid to tell their partner that they are pregnant and intend to halt them. I think their concerns are not unfounded. Ordo Iuris had already announced a fewer weeks ago that he intended to represent the rights of the father of the unborn child. And we sometimes watch men not support their partners who have made an abortion decision. They frequently gotta interrupt their pregnancy in hiding from them, do not say that they are undergoing abortion, simulate painful menstruation. Or they confess the truth, but they later live in fear that in the event of an argument or a breakup, this information will be utilized against them.
So the pro-abortion movement besides aims to reprogram the full life of a female – it tells her that she needs abortion and urges her to abandon her partner and break up her family. Do abortionists want all female to lead a single (or dog-substitute) life with guilt for the remainder of her life?
Insolence and hypocrisy
You can do it, you don't gotta wait for politicians to rule. “Invites the Bronian in the debate in “Goniec”, thus calling for a violation of the law. The ubiquitous pro-abortional media communications perpetuate the false image of the assassination of human life by presenting him as a noble act. Young women publically “gloat” about abortion, and this is no reason for them to be ashamed or sorry. Abortion goes to the feminist banners, and politicians are looking for a way to "fulfill women's expectations", which is to let them to kill children with impunity. Even those declaring attachment to Christian roots have no opposition to put their hand in an unethical in vitro procedure or vote for further discussion of abortion projects as if they could be considered at all. Acts of force and vandalism towards pro-life activists do not face appropriate consequence from authorities or appropriate punishment. In specified an atmosphere, pro-abortion activists feel confident, behave insolently and boast that they have broken the law, and the state has not punished them for it. The pro-lifers, on the another hand, put on a patch of obscurantism and “do what the priest tells them to do”.
Pro-choice activists do not hesitate to scope for a spiritual mask and to usage the support of entities named "Christian" or even "Catholic", which I consider to be perfidious manipulation. erstwhile the Federation Foundation, active in pro-abortion activities, functioned as an agreement of respective organizations, among its entities were: Polish Women's League, Polish Feminist Associations, Pro Femina Association, Neutrum – Associations for the benefit of the Neutral Worldview State and ...
I was amazed to read that "reproductive rights" is 1 of the main areas of action of this movement – on the YWCA's parent organization pages there is simply a clear statement: Body autonomy and the right to abortion are fundamental rights of all persons. Co-operating with the pro-abortional YWCA Federation, Poland enjoys the support of the Polish Ecumenical Council for any of its initiatives, and the “woman-prince” face 1 of its campaigns. This all happens under the name “Christianity”.
In turn, among sponsors or sponsors or advocates of the abortion activities of the Dream squad are the embassies of Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Canada, global organizations specified as the United Nations and Amnesty International, and of course feminist organizations, including an organization called... Catholics for Choice. Her boss Jamie L. Manson wrote: As part of most Catholics who know that access to abortion is value, we stand present in solidarity with ADT activists. We believe that those who choose abortion do so with a clear conscience. Catechism teaches us: In everything you say and do you are obliged to follow what you believe is just and good. We believe that love for fellow humans and helping people in request are pillars of humanity and cannot face repression and persecution.
This organization, of course, is not affiliated with or in any way related to the Catholic Church, due to the fact that it simply stands in contrare to its teaching. Furthermore, the Conservative Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz of Lincoln, Nebraska issued an interdict prohibiting Catholics in his diocese of membership of Catholics for Choice in March 1996. Bishop Bruskewitz stated that membership of this group threatens Catholic religion and is most frequently completely incompatible with it. The members of the diocese received a period from the date of the interdict to retreat from the organization under the threat of automatic excommunication. Of course, the CFC authorities at the time found that the decision was incorrect and insisted on their belief that they were acting in “good faith”.
The contradiction of the objectives and activities of the CFC with the teaching of the Catholic Church is evident, however, the organization uses the word “Catholics” impudently, suggesting publically that the people of this religion mostly support abortion. This can lead to confusion and spiritual confusion in any believers, so it is indeed a threat to the faith.
Well, wearing masks and mediocre imitation are known ways of acting evil. As Bishop Napiera pointed out in a 2008 homily: You who advance abortion, who urge it, and even in various ways force it, are rich; rich with various means of material pressure. But you deficiency one. You don't have the truth. And she's the most crucial 1 here. She decides the dignity and rank of civilization. It is simply a criterion of advancement and modernity. You live a lie and you usage a lie. You live in blindness. It's time to wake up and get out of captivity to him who is the father of the lie and the killer from the beginning. We must convert! There is mercy for you, and Christ died for you. We must convert!
Zofia Michałowicz
