The subject of racism returns regularly to public discourse. This time thanks to the return to Poland Janusz Walus, whose leftist-liberal environments they call "Rasist killer". A fewer years ago, this subject was peculiarly burning erstwhile black George Floyd and Michael Brown and Eric Garner were killed as a consequence of police abuse. This started a wave of anti-racist protests under the slogan "Black Lives Matter". Protests were so an expression of opposition to racism, which in discourse is almost always defined as the hatred of white people towards black people. But let us consider whether racism has a race?
Monopoly for hate?
The fact that there are human races and differences between them is undeniable and at least obvious. However, these differences sometimes lead to difficulty in surviving together, and additional historical events and unrewarded harms turn on the spiral of hatred. There is simply quite a few work and reports about racism towards black people, but it is frequently forgotten that racial prejudice is not reserved for white people. Although any are very keen to prove otherwise. An example is the effect of passwords Black Lives Matter and White Lives Matter. 1 is associated with the conflict for equality and justice, riots, truth, but "in a good cause." The second is blocked, for example, by social media, which claim to have a racist effect. This is usually argued by the opinion that seeking the lives of white people is unnecessary due to the fact that no 1 discriminates against them, so the slogan is either a contrite trolling or an expression of longing for times of "white supremacy". The claim that racism can only work 1 way is simply not true.
A fewer years ago, U.S. media featured scholarships funded by Utah Jazz basketball club. It's a well-known club, performing in the best basketball league in the world, and the scholarship itself is very valuable. The controversy around him concerns the condition that the scholarship is not intended for white people, regardless of their level of skill.
The specified mention of racism towards the white population is controversial today. An example is the confusion following the publication by the British Committee on Equality and Human Rights of a study on racism at British universities. The results of the survey indicated that 29 percent of black students, 27% Asian and 9% White students studying in England, Scotland and Wales were victims of racial discrimination. The results provoked outrage among the left-wing technological staff, which called for the inclusion of racial prejudice against the white population to be unjustified. Simple thing, you're white, you can't be discriminated against. During the Question Session, the Utah State politician was straight asked about the club's racist practices. politician Spencer James Cox, however, stated that this is not racism. I wonder if if the scholarship excluded representatives of another cultural groups, e.g. Latinos or blacks, the case would besides be silenced.
From Apartheid to Plaasmoorde
However, this is insignificant compared to what happens to white people in Africa. South Africa is the most severe example of a racist policy aimed at white citizens. It is simply a state whose foundation was laid by Dutch visitors in the 17th century. Their descendants are called Africans, or white people in South Africa. present it is about 4.5 million South African citizens. They are not colonizers or Europeans. Their great-grandparents and great-grandparents lived here, yet they are treated not even as strangers, but as unwanted intruders.
When Nelson Mandela came to power in 1994 and the abolition of apartheid was announced, the black people of the country came to power and declared the perfect alleged "rainbow nation" where everyone would feel good. However, this is not the case – racism in South Africa did not end after the removal of apartheid rights. To this day, the song “Kill Bura” (i.e. white South African) is played in the radios there. The employment Equity Act was besides introduced, which was intended to equalize the chances and leads to the fact that racial criteria are first-class erstwhile accepting a fresh employee. Of course, to the detriment of Africans. any universities have removed the language of Afrikaans, which is spoken by white people.
Radical groups, the dominant group in the parliament there, besides lead to a constant assault on the white minority, encouraging the power to take possession of white farmers. The rhetoric is clear; “You have worked in white X-years, so you have the right to take distant his land and the home he stole from your ancestors.” It's scary, but real. South Africa is simply a country with 1 of the highest execution rates in the planet – over 50 per day! Black people's murders on white farmers have even reached their word PlaasmoordeAnd agriculture in South Africa according to mortality statistic is the most dangerous profession in the world. Rape, arson and robberies – this is all on the agenda. The reason? “You are white, so you are a torturer. You are a torturer, so we can kill you.”
Short to End
The themes I have cited are just a fewer bright examples of the request for a short column. Situations in which Europeans are treated badly only as their skin colour are increasingly spreading in the Western media. In the face of continued migration to Europe, the demographic crisis and the reluctance to assimilate many immigrants, we can anticipate that there will be more victims of white racism. So it is crucial to be clear as shortly as possible – the victims of racism are besides white, and the fact that it is absolutely not racist to talk about it, as any people would like to tell us.
