For almost a year and a half, the “coalition of December 13” has been ruled by Donald Tusk. During this time, quite a few plebiscites were announced and more or little apparent winners were pointed out, but in the category "most disgrace and incompetence" the choice is overwhelming. How can we deal with the appointment of leaders in this group? The task seems almost impossible unless it reaches out to the extraordinary measurement of granting ex aequo titles. It would be easier to give specified a title to the full coalition, but it is an excessive simplification of the harmful Pegasus committee.
The writers of the most iconic comedy series would not be able to jump over the level of absurdity in which the Pegasus committee enters continuously with full spontaneity. Just writing down all the mistakes and grotesque behaviors of the committee members is trilogy material. It is adequate to mention specified hits as the “Zembaczyński member” or the circus show with a hastily closing of the meeting, so that Zbigniew Ziobro cannot appear on it. It would seem that, especially from this last compromise, which ended in a court ruling favorable to the erstwhile minister, the members of the committee would yet draw any reasonable conclusions. Is that what happened? Yes, but only to a minimum, and paradoxically, this highlighted the pathetic image of the committee.
The only conscious and competent associate of this political tragedy was Przemysław Wipler. The Confederate MP is simply a lawyer, unlike most of the committee members, and so he rapidly picked up another gross mistake that had been made. In fact, this mistake is closely related to the erstwhile one. Failed to bring Zbigniew Ziobra before the committee. It is precisely that, in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure, effective service of the notification follows receipt of the letter by the addressee, which is rather obvious. On the another hand, the procedure provides for the alleged double avation, in those cases where the addressee did not receive the consignment personally. This means that the consignment is considered to have been effectively delivered 14 days after the first aviso and 7 days after the second.
Using the language of lawyers, it can be concluded that in the facts of the case, the witness Zbigniew Ziobro had until 24 April 2025, 00.00 a.m. to fit within a time of envy. In human language, Zbigniew Ziobro did not violate the law in any way, if he received the announcement after the closing of the sitting. At the same time, the committee could not win the race due to the fact that Zbigniew Ziobro did not gotta receive the notification at all and then, legally, after 00.00, 25 April, the letter is deemed to have been served. The problem is that the transportation of the announcement after the date of the gathering of law and logic is considered ineffective. It does not substance whether Ziobro knew whether he knew erstwhile the gathering was due due to the fact that the committee had to meet the formal requirements, which she did not do.
The likely course of events will now be that, after the committee's motion to punish Ziobra's witness, the Minister will answer in a court in which he will describe the above state of affairs and one more time even a justice from Austria will gotta admit these explanations. Given that the committee has late compromised itself for a fewer minutes, and now it is about 24 hours, there has been any progress. Either way, this is the sixth effort to bring Zbigniew Ziobry before the committee and the sixth failed. Simple math suggests the consequence of a duel Pegasus Commission – Zbigniew Ziobro, this is not a result, but a pogrom of 0:6.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
