Paweł Lisicki on the explanation of universal salvation. It's the devil's large deception

pch24.pl 3 months ago

Universal salvation? This explanation is spreading more and more Catholics today. However, she was powerfully rejected by the Church. The explanation of universal salvation is simply a devil's trick to dissuade us from the fact about God and man. It was mentioned on PCh24 tv by Paweł Lisicki.

The conversation on PCh24 tv was about the concept of universal salvation, on which present a increasing number of theologians are cited. An ancient Christian theologian, Origen, is frequently cited as an authority. However, his thought in terms of universal salvation was rejected by the Catholic Church.

Origen succumbed besides much to Plato and Platonics, and he listened besides small and read into what he had to convey the fresh Testament said Paweł Lisicki.

It's a concept that we're dealing only with pedagogical punishment. Plato, for example, speaks of this in “Timajos” and in various myths he uses to describe the destiny of man after death. Plato was taking a journey of souls. erstwhile in a while, Plato's soul draws its fate, which is related to the group in which it is found. It is close to Hindu thoughts or another varieties of pagan thought, where methempsychosis occurs. This involves wandering the soul through various bodies, gradual cleansing – he pointed out.

This is simply a complete denial of what the Catholic discipline based here on the fresh Testament has been preaching. This teaching is clear and clear: there is no wandering of souls. Man has only 1 soul—since creation. This soul is nowhere else, it's nothing. all man is created in the image and likeness of God, erstwhile and for all. This is very much present in the fresh Testament. Origen, a very scholarly man, became besides deep into Greek ideas and Platonic thinking. He tried to bring it into the Christian thought. This led him to believe that there was no anticipation of eternal condemnation. A court over anyone can even take place, but only in the sense that yet everyone will be saved - He did.

Such an thought is called apocalypse, if it includes evil spirits.

It is simply a belief that both evil spirits and evil men will yet be saved, will live happily. This was very harshly rejected by the Church in 553 at the Second Council in Constantinople, but not only there. The apocalypse was besides combated later. If the substance is taken fairly, there is no another way. The fresh Testament represents the destiny of man after death in a final way. There's nothing about wandering, improving and so on. Christ in the Gospel of St. Matthew describes his coming to the Last Judgment. It divides people into 2 groups, saved and condemned. I do not want to enter into the criteria here, but the very fact that we are dealing with the announcement of the final court here – there is no place for fate, which will undergo any change yet, there is no place for the soul to improve, so that even if it has been condemned, it will later recover everything that it has lost. If we accept specified a view that after death we have further development, it would consequence in negation of God’s order and sense of existence in general. It's a typical devil trap. – he said.

It would turn out that our life on earth is yet any kind of illusion, right? Our life would be any kind of plasticine that can be formed at any time, due to the fact that it'll be time to change anyway. What we call the dignity of a human individual would be dissolved. We'd be stuck in this life without meaning. – explained.

It would turn out that our life here on earth is fundamentally just an illusion, right? It's just any kind of foam that we're stuck in, and that truly the choices made here are completely meaningless, that what's called human dignity or human dignity to melt away, right? due to the fact that it would turn out that our life is specified a plasticine that we can freely form, but whether it happens now or later, time ceases to be something important, right? – he added.

The concept of universal salvation of all men seemingly appreciates the importance of all man, but in fact is the strongest rejection of the value of existence and order of creation. Our lives would then be completely unnecessary and unnecessary He stressed.

According to Paweł Lisicki, 1 of the main sources of fascination with the apocalypse, which was shown in Poland, for example, by Fr. He presented them primarily in 2 books, “What We Can Hope for” (N. ‘Was dürfen wir hoffen’) and ‘Short discourse on hell’ (German ‘Kleiner Diskurs über die Hölle’).

Balthasar utilized the argument there that it would make no sense if any people were in heaven while another part was in hell. The saved could not bear the thought of suffering the condemned, it would undermine human solidarity and God's love. Therefore, according to Balthasar, the thought of universal salvation should be advocated.

That's a hell of a lock. This argument shows in false light who God is. He denies God’s justice. He rejects man's individual work for his actions. Without that responsibility, man could not make any choice. But if he has a free choice, he is liable and the consequences are eternal. If it were as Balthasar wanted, man would be like a mechanism, like an unreasonable animal. But this is the greatness of God’s creation and God’s love for man, that He allows us to choose. It gives us freedom, and this freedom is only full erstwhile it besides has consequences— stressed Paweł Lisicki.

The top Christian virtue is humility. This is expressed in accepting the order of creation, including the consequences of human freedom. – If Hans Urs von Balthasar were God, he might have made the planet different. I'm certain the Mephistopheles would have done it. But that's not their role. You must not cross the border that has been designated by creation. He who transcends it falls into Satan's pride begins to justice the Lord God and His creation. It's the biggest sin you can fall into. He must be avoided at all costs. - He said.

A Christian must remember that God himself besides humbled himself by becoming a man. This is the top lesson in humility. In addition, man should not carry out what is given to him, make any constructs of his own world, due to the fact that it will always be a devil's whisper.

Transhumanism is frequently mentioned among the concepts of a “better world”. This is connected with the belief that we ourselves could make a better man – implant chips in him, perfect him, give him more knowing and reasoning. Transhumanism is not about specified efforts to improve human existence, as medicine does; it is about creating a human-animal or human-digit hybrid, a fresh species that could be called “superhuman”. – This is typically a satanic action; an effort to seduce man, so that he no longer focuses on spiritual life and transcending earthly things, but that all his attention should be directed at temporality, to stay on earth as long as possible said Paweł Lisicki.

This gives a man a "feel of artificial worlds" in which he forgets himself and begins to live "in a strange, transhuman bubble," forgetting that he is simply a sinner and will stand before God's judgment.

More in the video.

Source: PCh24 TV

Read Entire Article