Mr. Robert, first tell me who scored the goal for Polish Warsaw on August 25, 1999. Excuse me? You don't know who she was playing with? Don't joke, due to the fact that my opinion of you is going to fall significantly, and I'm not hiding that it's not besides advanced now.
You truly don't remember? All right, I'll give you a hint, it's a game at the Konwiktorska with the Radzion Movement. I can't give the consequence anymore, due to the fact that it would be besides easy. You inactive don't know? It's very simple, Polonia. won 4-1 and 2 goals were scored by Tomasz Moskal and Emmanuel Olisadebe.
Aren't you ashamed? That's how you show your love for this club, and it turns out you despise it. After all, you do not remember the results of matches from the period in which Polonia won her last Polish championship. I don't specifically ask about the 1946 games, due to the fact that they truly can't be remembered. But wait, wait, let's make the rules that I'm the 1 asking the questions on this show! And you inactive haven't answered mine—are you ashamed that you despise the club you claim to be rooting for? The fact that you despise him, we've already agreed, really, let's not go back to it due to the fact that it would be sad for you and for our listeners.
What do you mean "nonsensical question"? So, according to you, your listeners do not deserve to know whether 1 of the biggest stars of alleged journalism in Poland is simply a fraud? Oh, so you're saying that disdaining a club that you publically declare a large sympathy for isn't cheating the audience? Then tell me what you think fraud is. You can describe it on the basis of any another machloika of yours. I'm assuming you have another ones due to the fact that we just accidentally discovered rather a large one.
I see that you don't want to cooperate today, so let's do this – I'll go make tea, and you can talk freely during that time. We'll be back in 2 minutes to have a serious conversation. A serious one, which is 1 where you won't yet lie, like you did present and erstwhile you did Zero Channel You argued that the improvement margin had to be divided by five. No, sir, I remember it was you, not you. Krzysztof Stanowski. I may not look like it, but I have a truly good memory.
But why are you leaving? Are you afraid of hard questions?
If this conversation had taken place, its cognitive value would have been precisely zero. That is, like most interviews by Robert Mazurek, whose admirable career perfectly illustrates the state of public debate in Poland – the aim is to effectively plow, humiliate or at least embarrass someone. You can miss the fact at the same time, just as long as it doesn't work during the program – and if it does, you can't admit it. You gotta fuck a fool to the end, then it'll all go down.
I besides admit that my work above is not even funny. Just like the first popular task of the current star RMF and Channel Zero, i.e. "From the life of the coalition, from the life of the opposition" by Robert Mazurek and Igor Zalewski in the weekly "Network". It was like a box. Mea pulpa Provincial Cuba in “Politics”. A man read it to the end due to the fact that he was hoping he'd yet come across something a small funny. At the end he traditionally felt a profession – nothing, possibly next week there will be something. Provincial at least nobody takes it seriously and everyone knows he's a clown.
"We regret to note the decrease in the number of invitations by Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz to television. Zetafon erstwhile told at least erstwhile a day on TVN how terrible Jarosław Kaczyński, who erstwhile made him Prime Minister. Now, possibly since the problem with the “Isabel”, Zetafon seems to have disappeared. Were it not for “Gazeta Wyborcza” and WSI24, we would not know what to think” – wrote Mazurek from Zalewski after the PiS took over. That's what the full box looked like anyway.
Then Mazurek became celebrated for his interviews, in which he cited any of the erstwhile statements of his interlocutors, without betraying their author, or even deliberately misleading, and asked for comment. Many were drawn to it and were eager to criticize the quoted words. The most celebrated example was interview with the National League, in which the writer quoted the program's postulates from the expected PiS program. erstwhile Krajewska was driven into raspberries, Mazurek, as if nothing had happened, stated: “Before you say besides much and ask yourself poverty, I will admit to manipulating. I quoted the National Programme of the large Construction of the Citizens' Platform of 2007".
That's cool. First he will lie a little, then admit to a small manipulation and can already account for the interviewer from his reaction to the questioner's lies. The task was carried out due to the fact that Krajewska's career was ruined – which in itself is not a large tragedy, due to the fact that the then MP PO did not belong to eagles even in the background of another liberals. Only in this way, even half the composition of the Sejm could be destroyed. And what serious social goal did this have? Has the quality of Members and Members improved since then? I would not say that in this word of office on the agrarian bench there are specified stars as Michał Kołodziejczak, Łukasz Meyza, Claudia Jachira or Adam Gomola.
Currently editor Mazurek leads among others program au Krzysztof Stanowski On Channel Zero. They take any comical situations from the borderline of politics, social affairs and cabaret and then discuss them in specified a way that they cease to be funny. The gentlemen effort to force on the people watching the grin with their loose way of being – they deliberately shoot lapsus which are expected to look unintentional, snort with laughter at their jokes, frequently contact themselves to show each another something like a closer feeling, to make them realize that they are as stale as bread in a long-lost house, but besides a small progressive. I mean, you know, all this advancement is erstwhile 2 of the Chops take the hand for a second, hehe.
Chat with MP Paulina Matysiak in RMF, however, it was expected to be serious, due to the fact that it took place in the publicist part of the leading Polish radio. Mazurek began by listing the group redundancies announced this year across the country and began to ask “what the Left government has to propose to these people”, although Left has the smallest club in the coalition. 1 of the most substantive and active MPs had to explain to the least substantive writer in Poland why it did not block exemptions in private companies in Słupsk, Warsaw, Płock and Jaworzin Śląska, or cities not even within its district.
When Matysiak began to talk about her actions on dismissals in the Polish Post, Mazurek began to mock her, that she was taking part in any pickets, although she is in the government. erstwhile she recalled that neither she nor her full organization together are in government, Mazurek began to convince that they were voting for the government in all matters. Matysiak replied that it was not true, but red. The mazurek insisted that the truth. So, the MP mentioned to him a fresh vote against ZUS vacancies for entrepreneurs, but Mazurek resolvedly stated that it was completely irrelevant. The simplification of ZUS contributions to all entrepreneurs and self-employed in Poland – i.e. Mazurek – is invalid due to the fact that yes. due to the fact that it doesn't match the pre-arranged conversation.
On the issue of group dismissals, Mazurek cited the CSO data talking about 17,000 jobs, which will thus disappear. This is, of course, very sad in itself, only that this is the case all year, as the group exemptions are legal and different companies announce specified actions all year. A massive simplification of 30,000 jobs was announced last year (a importantly less people were yet released), as was the case in 2021. At the time, however, the subject was not on the wallpaper, so ed. The mazurek most likely hasn't even heard of it.
The best part is that the writer himself is simply a declared economical liberal. ♪ Loud ♪ conversation With Adrian Zandberg, he accounted for the MP's demands for general taxation progress, admitting that he was bypassing it himself, as he allegedly had to be on a line due to the fact that he had a company. I own a company, and I'm not on the line, so erstwhile I hear that kind of nonsense, the IRS number goes off on my phone, but let's skip the point. In any case, the Liberal Mazurek in a conversation with Matysiak began to play at least a unionist from the Workers' Initiative, although if the MP had proposed to ban group redundancies, he would most likely have started to talk about PRL.
However, on the employment site Rocketjobs.pl, i.e. on the portal of the main sponsor of Channel Zero, almost all company offers B2B employment. And erstwhile accusations of mistreatment of employees in RMF late appeared, Mazurek began defend His colleagues in the highest positions, due to the fact that nothing like that happened to him. Well, it's no wonder he yet has a celebrity contract, he's self-employed, and the 2 men mentioned in the reports are his old colleagues.
When the conversation came to the request of Mrs Matysiak to introduce a velocity limit of 30 km/h in cities, we had already faced a pure circus on wheels. The argument that at specified a velocity the mortality rate of accidents is drastically decreasing, Mazurek signed a proposal to lower it to 9 km/h and then there will be even little casualties.
Matysiak pointed out that she brought the substance to absurdity, to which Mazurek immediately replied that it was not him, but her. He will shortly start telling his interviewers "your old lady", and that is what this is going to do. In this program, he has not yet fallen so low, although he was already close, as he then began to account for the messenger together for having no driver's license, so he cannot speak. It was as if only the drivers utilized the city space, and the pedestrians moved by a cable car. If it were up to red. Mazurka, I'm certain you would.
It's hard to tell what else this man would gotta do to halt taking him seriously. late released a TVP writer due to the fact that he threw a "fuck" on the air in a stressful situation. The mazurek, meanwhile, makes a rag out of all journalism and nothing bad happens to him. As you can see, sometimes it is better not to get a strong position in the profession, so as not to become embarrassing in old age.
