I will now quote just 1 of president Trump's many statements about the annexation of Canada by the United States, and not only the American Exceptionism ideology, but besides the pre-discourse argument of Prussia and Russia towards the Republic:
"You get free of that artificially drawn line, and you take a look at what looks like, and it would besides be much better for national security. Don’t forget, we fundamentally defend Canada. But here’s the problem with Canada. So many friends up there, I love the Canadian people. They’re great, but we’re spending hundreds of billions a year to defend it. We’re spending hundreds of billions a year to take care of Canada. We loose in trade deficits.”
"You're getting free of this artificially drawn line and we're going to look at what it looks like, and it would besides be much more beneficial to national security. Let us not forget that we are fundamentally protecting Canada. But there's a problem with Canada. So many friends live upstairs, I love Canadians. They're great, but we spend hundreds of billions a year to defend them. We spend hundreds of billions a year to take care of Canada. However, we are losing the trade deficit."
The specified impertinence of stealing another people's property is always justified by seemingly rational arguments! In another words, Canada as a 40 million-dollar state, with a strong national identity, the second largest surface in the world, is incapable to guarantee its own safety and lives in a parasitic relation with the US, and should so be joined (grabed) to the American power as a 51st state. Identical arguments were put forward by Prussia and Russia stripping Poland. The same opinions were expressed by Adolf Hitler and Józef Stalin towards Poland by signing the Non-Aggression Pact in 1939. president Trump's words must not be ignored by silence, nor should they be cast to the fore by many irresponsible and foolish statements of this man. They are the consequence of many serious discussions that take place in the privacy of the cabinet between president Trump and his advisors.
The partitions of Poland are a taboo subject among Western historians due to the fact that their genesis and course is simply a very shameful matter, confirming the conspiracy communicative of history. The issue of dissection besides weighed on the formation of the United States political system, as evidenced by Thomas Jefferson's letter to John Adams of November 13, 1787: https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-12-02-0342
“How do you like our fresh constitution? I confess there are things in which rank all my differences to subscribe to what specified an assertive has been proposed. The home of national representatives will not be adequate to the management of affairs either abroad or federal. Their president seems a bad edition of a Polish king. He may be re-elected from 4. years to 4. years for life. Reason and experience prove to us that a chief masterate, so continuous, is an authoritative for life. erstwhile 1 or 2 generations Shall have proven that this is an office for life, it becomes on all succession worth of intrigue, of bribery, of force, and even of abroad interference.”
“How do you like our fresh constitution? I will admit that there are things in it that shake me up and keep me from signing the convention proposal. The Chamber of national Representatives will not be the appropriate institution to manage abroad or national affairs. Their president seems a mediocre release of the Polish king. all 4 years he may be re-elected for the next 4 years and so until his death. Reason and experience prove to us that the chief administrator, so defined, is an authoritative for life. erstwhile 1 or 2 generations prove that this is an office for life, it becomes worthy of intrigue, bribery, force, or even alien interference.”
He will besides quote the words of Carl von Clausewitz, whose work “About War” entered the planet canon of political and strategical thought. The texts by von Clausewitz, Doctrine Monroe, by Niccolò Machiavelli are at the heart of Realpolitik theory, whose main representative, venerated by Henry Kissinger, is Clement von Metternich.
However, we stand by the opinion that the individual accident, even the brightest, proves nothing to the general facts, and we besides claim that the demolition of Poland is not as misunderstood as it seems. Could Poland truly be regarded as a European state, a single part of the European Republic of Poland? No! No! It was a Tatar state which, alternatively of lying, like Crimea, on the Black Sea, on the border of the planet of European states, lay between them, over the Vistula River. We do not want to talk with contempt of the Polish people, nor justify the partition of the country, but only consider things as they are.
He paraphrases von Clausewitz's last sentence: We do not want to talk here with contempt of the dirty, lame and hunchback Káska, nor to justify why we illegally took and demolished the redhead in which she and her household lived for centuries, and which stood between our palaces, but simply to state that as she walked down the street, dogs were crying out of despair at the sight of her ugliness, and her ruiner ruined our sight and well-being. The place of the fescued Káska is in the slum between his!
Any wickedness, any taking of abroad property can and must be rationally justified! all thief and bandit knows that! The partitions of Poland should be a warning, specified as Memento Mori, for all nations and countries, and especially for Canadians!
At the end of the second part, I urge a very crucial interview with Virginia State Senator Colonel Richard Black. The Senator describes how U.S. bureaucrats prepared a list of 7 states to annihilate and the mechanics of wars in Ukraine and Syria.
(I besides urge a very good article by Dr. Damian Winczewski entitled: Carl von Clausewitz's political realism and the Polish case. Link: https://magazines.uni.opole.pl/index.php/sk/article/view/1438 ).
Read the erstwhile part in Trumpland:
Mr Szymanski: Trumpland. Doctrine Monroe, American Exceptionalism and Mesianism
