The last G7 summit should be understood primarily as shaping the battlefield in the "war of narrative", whose main "front" is present the insistence of the Biden squad that only 1 "reality" – the US-led ideology of "principles" (and only it) – can dominate. And secondly, to make it clear that the West "Don't lose"in this war with another 'reality'." This another reality is simply a multi-valent "otherness", which clearly enjoys expanding support worldwide.

Many in the West simply do not realize how fast geopolitical tectonic plates are moving: the first fork of the records (failed Russia's financial war) has already led to a wave of building. Anger is growing. People no longer feel alone in rejecting Western hegemony – "they don't care anymore."

Only in the week preceding the G7 summit, the arabian League virtually "became multipolar"; She abandoned her erstwhile pro-American automation. The hug of president Assad and the Syrian Government was a logical consequence of the secondary shift of the tectonic plate initiated by China with their Saudi-Iranian diplomacy – a revolution that Mohammad bin Salman (MbS) then logically extended to the full arabian sphere.

MbS sealed this "release" of US control by inviting president al-Assad to the top to symbolize the act of the League's universal iconoclasm.

For the West it is ontologically impossible to tolerate dismantling their reality: seeing their society and the planet divided into 2 parts. However, communicative reality is so embedded thanks to the well-accelerated effectiveness of MSM messages that politicians have become lazy. They do not gotta argue with their rations, nor do they have the motivation to refrain from untruth.

Dynamics is exophaltic: overrated "monolithic reality" evolves into a Manichean conflict to death and life. Any apostasy from the "legislators" side may lead to the collapse of the media's "card house". (This notion of monolithic reality is not shared by most another societies that see reality as multifaceted).

Denial becomes endemic. So we are witnessing a hawk G7, a distraction from a communicative failure (the fall of Bachmut) by accidental accepting a trick to deliver F-16 to Ukraine; punishing China for not forcing president Putin to "retreat" from Ukraine; and utilizing the gathering to establish a communicative framework for the upcoming confrontation with China on commercial issues and Taiwan.

One commentator (at the summit) wondered: "Am I inactive in Europe or in Japan?", listening to rhetoric, as if taken from an earlier von der Leyen speech to the EU. Von de Leyen has developed the phrase "risk reduction" with China to hide the creeping fork in production between the EU and China at the European Commission factory. However, this reflection serves to stress that Von der Leyen has become de facto associate of Biden's team.

China angeredly responded to the G7 summit's allegation that it had become a workshop of "vilification" and defamation of China.

This wide-ranging communicative for confronting China is seen as essential by the G7 as the remainder of the planet does not see China as a real "threat" for the US: rather, they realize that the real "threats" for the US stem from their interior divisions alternatively than from external sources.

The importance of G7 lies not so much in anti-Chinese narratives, but, to put it plainly, due to the fact that the full episode expresses western pride, which brings out utmost danger in relation to Ukraine. He speaks of the reality that the West – in the current intellectual mode – will not be able to present any credible political initiative to end the conflict in Ukraine. (Remember that Moscow was heavy crushed by an earlier episode from Minsk).

The G7 language renounces any serious diplomacy and signals that it remains imperative to stick to the mantra "not to lose": Bachmut's fall is not Kiev's failure, but Putin's pyrrus loss; Ukraine wins, Putin loses, the message G7.

Pride lies in the eternal protection of the West towards president Putin and Russia. Washington (and London) simply cannot get free of the belief that Russia is fragile; its armed forces barely, if at all, competent; its economy craters; and that so Putin would most likely catch almost any "oil branch" that America would offer him.

The fact that president Xi could, or would like to, push Putin to "retreat" in Ukraine and accept a ceasefire under EU conditions, which are "the conditions of Zelenski" is simply a delusion. However, any key EU leaders truly seem to think that Putin can be tricked by Xi or Modi to leave Ukraine on conditions that are totally beneficial to Kiev. These European leaders are simply dangerous hostages of intellectual processes that drive them to negationism.

Russia "wins" on the front of the financial war and on the global diplomatic front. It has an overwhelming advantage in number of forces; it has an advantage in weaponry; it has an advantage in the sky and in the electromagnetic sphere. While Ukraine is in disarray, its forces are decimated, and the Kiev creation is rapidly falling apart.

Don't they "understand"? Lol Endless bitter antagonism towards Putin and Russia has allowed us to break distant from the imagined reality; to increasingly distance ourselves from any connection to reality; And then go to delusion – always drawing from akin reasoning cheerleaders for confirmation and extended radicalization.

This is serious psychosis. due to the fact that alternatively of rationally addressing conflict, the West consistently invents "non-starters", specified as "frozen conflict". Do they truly think Russia "will sit down with its hands on", while the West "will rise" as a "armed to the teeth" NATO lawyer in the west of Ukraine? A proxy who's gonna wipe out the Russian side and bleed out Russian resources in the long term? Do they imagine that the lesson from Afghanistan was lost by Russian command? I can say it's not. I was an actor. This tragedy.

What's next? Russia will most likely wait to see if Kiev can carry out the offensive – or not. If Kiev starts the offensive, it would make sense if Russia allowed Ukrainian forces to throw themselves on Russian defensive lines and spend their forces further in the fresh "meat machine". Moscow will test whether the patrons of Kiev are willing to recognise "facts in the field", not any imaginary reality, agreeing to Moscow's terms. If not, Russian exhaustion can proceed until the border with Poland. There is no another option – even if it was Moscow's last choice.

The F-16 diversion will not change the balance of strategical war; But of course it will prolong the war. However, the European leaders at the G7 summit picked up this proposal.

Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis, elder associate Defence Priorities in Washington DC, warned: