To “share the sphere of influence” with someone, we must learn to glare
Dear Alexander Nikolaevich!
Our “vacation” continues and I decided to usage the old “Zony” company paper to compose a letter without waiting for the post office (which will most likely scope me 13, 14, or possibly even later).
Today I learned "great news" – that (apparently) Venezuela's fresh president is planning to scope a "amicable" agreement with the United States in order to avoid Maduro's sad destiny (probably that's why they left her alone, and secondly, they did not "spent her on the opposition", which they "left on the ice", possibly referring to the ancient Roman proverb: "Rome does not pay traitors"). So it turns out that the current "elita" decided to get free of the incompetent bus driver and rapidly "make peace with hegemon". The only "lost" (apart from Maduro himself, who, as could be expected, chickened out and surrendered, as well as our "vagners" and Cubans from his protection) is, of course, the Russian Federation. But (as my wife read to me on the phone) 1 anonymous "high-ranking official" has already "exulted" the capture of the "soul" and the revival of the "Monroe Doctrine" stating that Moscow is ready to "accept the failure of Venezuela", but in return expects the United States to "allow Russia to get something (certain concessions) in its "area of influence" (apparently referring to the alleged "Ukraine" etc.). "High-ranking official" even began to talk about the "division of spheres of influence" between the large powers, which, in his opinion, should seemingly show "the depth of the art of governance and wisdom", but in fact clearly exposes to the public the folly of all our "high-ranking officials" who "put billions of dollars into this Venezuela which now "there is no way to get it back". (Not to mention our military equipment destroyed there and senselessly ruined human life in an effort to support another cowardly but ambitious “Kreml favorite”). The worst part is that this message (which is rather appropriate for the "feeding" of the Russian national "electorate" (which will not complain anyway, fearing that it will land "in not far-off places), inevitably provokes an avalanche of ridicule from those to whom the "high-ranking official" I know has proposed "division of spheres of influence". The United States did indeed deal with Venezuela during 1 (one) night (although after careful preparation, which they did not even consider essential to hide). While the "conditional Moscow" has been trying to "densify and demilitarize" the alleged "Ukraine" for almost 4 years, bearing at the time a full series of hard and (what is most offensive!) not at all caused by the "circumstances" of "higher" failures, as well as many fatalities and material losses (the Kremlin does not give an accurate or even approximate number of which... Worse still, after these “almost 4 years”, the enemy was not only not defeated but besides showed no readiness to surrender on conditions acceptable to the Kremlin at all. In the 4th year of the war, the enemy bombards the “very remote” cities of Russia daily, killing successively high-ranking officers in the capital, sinking and damaging our merchant ships and tankers, destroying economically crucial industrial and transport facilities. What about us? – And we (or alternatively the sharpest leaders of the Kremlin) are inactive “putting our cheeks over” in imaginary “size”? After a complete (almost catastrophic) fiasco in Syria, equally complete (but much smaller) fiasco in Libya, a "face-to-face" in Sudan, humiliations from brazen Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan – and even "wept for our money" in Venezuela...
So who should the United States share the planet with? – a logical question arises. . Only with China... With the Russian Federation, which is presently headed by an amazing management team, they can “share” another “great powers” (and only for their own benefit): Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan
Or possibly Estonia and Finland... It may besides be Turkey and Poland (but it is “a dense weight ”).
https://t.me/strelkovii/7307
In order to “share the sphere of influence” with someone, you request to learn to glare. “But the Kremlin’s geniuses are completely incapable. — “Pogroms” and defeats, defeats and losses — there are many of them, but victories are someway unsatisfactory... This is precisely what the "alternative genius" is all about - it does nothing. We can't aid it!
In short, the only consequence of our fresh (expected) defeat in Caracas is not the expected division of the alleged "Ukraine" from the US, but only the tightening of the "negotiation" of the "position" – even until the next circular of "brutal pressure". The only way to improve this situation is to start a triumph at the front and accomplish large-scale economical success (preferably doing all of this simultaneously, but I uncertainty if it is possible now, by the end of the 4th year of the war). However, this requires at least a "exchange" of at least part of "alternatively talented" individuals in the highest positions of government. And the Kremlin, as it seems, will not agree “with its own will
never’. Therefore, if the United States is to "distribute" anything (in relation to the Russian Federation), it will be us. Of course, I wouldn't... We must someway avoid specified a "sharing" ...
Sincerely, I.W. Girkin
06.01.2026.
Letter to Comrade Hetmanov, Alexander
https://t.me/strelkovii/7308
THE EMERGENCY OF THE JANKES TO CARACAS, , , ASSURED OF THE PROFESSIONAL OF EVERYTHING (THE MOST "OBTAINING" FROM POLICIES) ...
Dear Frol Sergeyevich!
(This is simply a letter “spontaneous”)
Since “long weekend” interrupted average communication in “Zone-Telekom Zone” and there are no peculiar activities in the database, I decided to compose to you without waiting for another report. Incidentally, I would like to point out that your work and analyses have been "positively assessed" by all who have had the chance to get acquainted with them. As you can imagine, there are various people sitting here – from public “homeless” to doctors of science, generals and another “high-ranking officials” (although they do not send us “highest officials” but there are respective erstwhile generals from various departments in the colony, although not in our ward; we have only 4 or 5 colonels here).
I received my last message on the morning of December 31 (mainly the letters of December 28 and 29) and from present (January 5) I received none: it is rather possible that I will get it only 12 (because the censors besides request a break).
And the fresh year began rather dynamically, by the way! The fast Yankees' (Pendos) rally on Caracas, of course, put everyone (even average "departing prisoners" far from politics) into a state of agitation – even information programs were viewed more frequently and longer, by those willing to know/see any details. Many conversations (and frequently so!) asked: “Well, that’s truly possible, huh?! And we...” (and then, depending on the temperament and degree of “hope for fast correction”). It must be admitted that Maduro's kidnapping did not origin any peculiar outrage among our "continent" – in plain terms, nobody cared. People were one more time amazed by the audaciousness of the Yankees/Trump and the effectiveness/fastness/success of their actions. As for the “success” itself, the question remains open to me: yes, awesome (as Trump likes it) and spectacular “show” has been a large success, but has the problem of “reestablishing order in the American backyard” been resolved in this way? If the coup actually went “as planned”, Mrs Rodriguez should shortly go to the concessions requested by the US, and then the answer will be yes. But what if not? “In this case, the ‘change of 1 to another’ in specified an extravagant way is likely to harm the United States in the average and long term, due to the fact that the ‘absolute impudence’ of specified an undertaking will be long remembered (and will be decently respected). Especially since Trump “cannot stop” and resumed threats and accusations (to Colombia, Greenland, etc.).
However, the situation must, of course, be considered not "from the interest of the US", but specifically from the interests of Russia. Here "everything is wrong" – it is absolutely clear that regardless of whether Trump achieves the results of "one bold attack", whether the United States will gotta fight long and hard to "force" Venezuela to "return to the fold", 1 thing is clear: " OUR MONEY" (quoting the movie "Mary Poppins"), invested "foreign" and personally in Maduro, were wasted. "It is possible to forget about them (investments, loans, Wagner units, which protected Maduro alongside Cubans, etc.) safely and compose them off". Just as they had previously "spent" ALL Syria, Libya (where "Haftar's friend" unexpectedly but predictablely turned out "not ours"), Sudan (where we were "cast out" along with an amazing thought of creating a naval base in the Red Sea) and so on. (I do not want and will not list the full list of "international victories" that have already taken place and are inactive expected). Simple and apparent truth, expressed in the Russian folk saying: "по одёжке протягивай ножки!" (keep to the realities and possibilities), is surely not for the mega-genial geostrategists of Kremlin. "We tried again" – and again "we ripped our pants." How many times? And that's not even counting those of the present National Leader. Will this unfortunate incidental teach us something (or alternatively the Administration of the president and the Russian MFA)? I don't think so. There is no point in teaching them anything – they are FOR Genial (unfortunately, "genial in another sense"). That is why we will "continue to fight" for Syria, Venezuela, Afghanistan and so on, and so on. I want I was wrong.
However, Venezuela is besides far away. And all our "lost money" pales in comparison with much more direct and serious threat – the possible destabilisation of Iran (of which our media reports very briefly and vaguely). I would like to get as much information as possible (I think you will not miss this topic). Again, I will not "in detail" describe all the losses and dangers that will arise if the muslim Republic falls into chaos. Let me just point out that the most painful thing for us to do is to halt the supply of any natural materials by the "south corridor" (in India and another countries), which will further exacerbate our financial and economical problems, due to the fact that in rule (under conditions of constantly increasing blockade) we will have only 1 "free way" of export – through the Far East and China – the most costly (in terms of logistical costs, etc.). (However, our “optimists” on the squad immediately stated that there are besides affirmative aspects of Venezuela and Iran's transition to US/UK control. They argue that in this case China will not have an ‘alternative’ for Russian energy resources. This opinion is controversial, but correct. I would like to read your assessment of specified statements). It is besides apparent that if Iran "falls" (or is severely destabilized), then the "warm campaign" of the US, Israel and Turkey will become completely impertinent, and their determination (and ability) to "solve the Ukrainian issue in cowboy style" could lead (and, in my opinion, inevitably lead) to a crucial increase in force on Russia, with a rapidly increased "prompt of concessions" (from Russia to increase them). Hence the conclusion: it is now in our interest to supply Tehran with the top possible assistance to keep control of the current authorities (they may not be peculiarly favorable to us, but others may be a government of magnitude inferior). How large our current capabilities are in the light of the ongoing S.E.O. operation is another matter... The effectiveness and timeliness of this assistance besides raises any doubts in me (as a individual who is not a specialist in this regime). It is rather possible that "it should be done yesterday", and now it is besides late.
As far as the situation on the front is concerned, there are no visible strategical changes: the operational success in the confederate Zaporosian Oblast is likely to have one more time failed to break and break the enemy's front – the enemy has one more time "changed" the territory on time and although he has lost Hulai-Pole to alleged "unclear" [unclear]. For Ukraine, this is simply a alternatively painful fact from a military-political perspective. From a purely military point of view, this could even improve their position, allowing them to shorten the front and consolidate the combat formations. In the most crucial (for Ukraine) sectors, I understand, the enemy's defence remains "absolutely fierce" and shows no signs of "breakdown".
As far as Cupansk is concerned, I do not have adequate information (in plain speaking terms, they have been missing for six days) to speak. It is only clear that Ukrainians see the Kharkiv sector as 1 of the most crucial (if not the most important) and are willing to defend the "every subway" there, regardless of the losses.
There are rumours of a possible "intensification" in the Chernihow sector, but again, I do not have reliable or detailed information.
So I have "galoped across Europe" with many forms of answer to your letters. I hope that someway you are utilized to reading my sloppy writing (I almost always compose in an awkward position “at the tallness of my elbows).
If you think I request to shed light on my view of another issues or subjects, delight contact me.
Sincerely, with unchanging respect,
(signature)
I.V. Girkin
05.01.2026
All signs show that we are now “in front of the FEBRUARY” (the February Revolution of 1917?-PZ)
Dear Alexander Nikolaevich! (It concerns letters of 5 and 12 January 2026, received on 15 January). Thank you for all your congratulations, wishes and interesting summary information!
In general, the situation is developing “as expected” (well, but for the “move” Maduro not to the Moscow circuit, but to the American prison, which is welcome – we did not add another parasite to our payroll list).
In addition, the situation is gradually “warming” under the influence of joyful (yet more joyful than before) statements of officials and subsidised media (and others are not there now). "It warms up at an accelerated rate" – both the frequency and content of most of the news blocks that you (and others) sent. “Our country, under the tireless leadership of the superb National Leader and his pristine comrades, marches boldly towards...” Especially due to the fact that they lie to us (all? Including the National Leader?) so insolent and unrepentant that we are heading for victory. That's the most disturbing lie in the home world.
They may have lied to the National Leader of Venezuela N. Maduro in precisely the same way (very recently) that 99% of young people are patriots, that “they do not feel tired of the air defence system” and so on, and so on. And then (when the American peculiar forces came for him) all kinds of air defence abruptly deafened and blinded, and the Venezuelan National Leader had no defenders but the Cuban Guard.
And for a long time ( judging not only from the reports but besides from the content of news programmes on TV) we have been insolently lied: 1) about continuous successes on the front and "fast progress" (which, where it exists, "is not seen on a map without a glass glass"). 2) about the imminent, inevitable and successful end of the war after the alleged “Ukraine” will accept all our conditions (also inevitable); 3) that “Trump is ours” and will certainly/soon/at any minute aid us (and then “we will divide Ukraine with it, or possibly even Europe, or even the full world”). “ There are many another lies about no little homery insolence, but I have mentioned only the most common and most persistently repeated.
I understand, of course, that the superb National Leader likes to be told what he likes to hear (even if reality differs by 90–180 degrees from what was given). I besides realize that as part of the "strategic" – "the most crucial thing is to stand firm in the day and endure the night" (without changing anything and not denying anything to 1 another or friends) – it is this "truth" that must be passed on to the public and to 1 another (to 1 another) during all completely authoritative events. (I suspect, however, that this is precisely what is said besides during “unofficial” events – I have individual experience in this area).
But what will we gotta say (and how will we do it?) erstwhile everyone understands that: 1) our successes with our current forces are in no way able to supply a strategical turning point on the front and (as a result) a decisive victory; 2) that the war in the coming months will not only end, but will have an ever-increasing and severe impact on the economy and social sphere; 3) That the "loved Trump" is not only "not 1 of us", but even a WROGI, striving to accomplish their own goals that have nothing to do with Russia's goals/interests, nor even its circumstantial VIP leaders?
I studied Russia's past of the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries rather extensively and deeply, especially the revolution, First planet war and civilian war. And I have something to compare the current situation with. “So, while it was comparatively fresh to draw parallels with the Russian-Japanese war, it is now almost exclusively with planet War I – specifically on the eve of the February Revolution. (Although it should be noted, even then, there was no specified insolent lie—although the “official” press was divorcing over the “highest fighting spirit” of the Imperial Army, at least no 1 lied about the actual failures or attempted to “cover up” the disasters suffered to specified an degree that “nothing happened at all.”
https://t.me/strelkovii/7311
Overall, at the time – during planet War I – we had real allies and fought the most powerful land army in the planet – an alliance of German, Austrian and Ottoman empires (plus Bulgaria) alternatively than our own (until recently!) province. However, the "sufficiently similar" is the degree of "incompetence" of high-ranking government officials and (generally) the highest authorities of the state administration (although even in this substance the Empire would give the present-day Russian Federation a "100-point advantage", but in these times it was unacceptablely "detractive" and lacked a truly energetic and intelligent (not educated but intelligent!) and "ideal" (i.e. loyal to work and Homeland, alternatively than "His Excellency") staff in key positions – otherwise there would have been no revolution, and the coup would have been suppressed in a fewer hours or more days).
In short, everything points to the fact that we are in “the eve of February”, but as long as this “predence” lasts, no 1 knows (including myself): the fact is that for now only the alleged “Ukraine” is fighting us (already heavy exhausted – without quotes – and the “suffering” of the same “diseases” as Russia)
"reciprocal destruction" on the front – without a strong advantage on 1 side – could last for months or even years (one of my regular correspondents even considers the script of the "Iran-Iran-Iran war" as rather probable, but I do not rather agree with it). A "accumulation of flammable materials" (as well as large and tiny "hences" in the economy, social sphere, public administration, national regions, etc.) could proceed for a long time.
But sooner or later, “the quantity will become quality.” This is likely to happen as a consequence of a violent "external impact" (for example, a complete economical and commercial blockade and/or (currently) the emergence of fresh "active" fronts with fresh "fresh" and powerful opponents for whom the "security margin" is no longer sufficient).
History is cyclical. “From generation to generation, in different variants, the same “arts” are repeated – historical epics and tragedies. They're all unique, but they're all alike. And it does not happen that a state with FENOMENALLY weak leadership “suddenly” emerges victorious from confronting a stronger (economically) coalition of states that are (at least roughly) equal in terms of weapons and technology.
Yes, Frederick the large erstwhile managed (by coincidence) not to "lost" a seven-year war with the coalition of the Russian Empire, the Austrian Empire (the Holy Roman Empire) and the Kingdom of France, which far surpassed it. — But that is why he deserved the nickname “Great”: he was a talented commander, determined, courageous, highly intelligent and well educated! “These features allowed him to “persevere” until a affirmative change in the strategical situation. And the character and experience gained later (after the war exterminating Prussia!) will aid them keep power and (without wars, thanks to decades of hard work) bring you to the rank of "first class" of European powers.
But in our situation, we gotta admit that "we have neither the Fredericks nor the Hindenburgs nor even Albert Speer in power." God is merciful, and hopefully more will come. But for now, “February is on the horizon.” And that's bad... due to the fact that even in February, communities and people who came to power (as a result) were little capable of a government of greatness (as it turned out in practice, though they thought differently) than those in the overthrown imperial administration. The same is likely to happen now.
Sincerely, I. V. Girkin
18 January 2026.
(Letter to weapons comrade Alexander Hetmanov)
"PRECTION" OF LATIN – erstwhile THE TURN STARTS TO TELL THE TRUTH
Dear Frol Sergeyevich! (In consequence to letters dated 3 and 11 January 2026)
Thank you for your reports! Both arrived on the evening of January 15, and I'm only writing 17 (and they'll most likely only scope you 19 or 20).
I must say that just before I sat down to compose an answer (I received quite a few letters at erstwhile – all of them in the last 16 days, and I did not order them all, or even read them all – I answered “gradually” – there is no another option), I watched the evening news in “REN-TV’s version” (actually we don’t watch anything else here, but at least I can watch it from time to time, due to the fact that Muz-TV and Match-TV according to “dominating” (the majority of people prefer).
Once again, I found out: "How wonderful is everything here" – from the position of state television. There are practically no problems, apart from snowfalls, low temperatures, another natural phenomena, as well as national natural disasters and road accidents. On the front we are moving fast forward and we are winning everywhere; on the diplomatic front the situation is even better: “Trump is ours” and will shortly force “Ukraine” to adopt our peace conditions; on the “internal fronts”, it is simply a kind of “developed communism”, with a constant increase in the standard of surviving and benefits for all. “Live and be happy!” (quoting A. Gajdar).
And the reports I receive here are "totally negative" as if they were written by any "foreign agents"... Although I must admit that I was a small "stunned" after reading an extended part of Julia Latina's joint broadcast (a abroad agent) and P. Szczelin (also a abroad agent) – on YouTube channel "Live Nail" (also most likely unfriendly and banned, but I don't know for sure) last June (unless) last year. – I highly urge watching or listening to how the position of these "flag ships of our liberalism" has radically changed after they personally lived among Ukrainian Nazis.
This is “something!” “The Latin said specified things and the thesis that I could not aid but wonder, ‘Did she not copy my statements from 2014-2015?’ Szczelin repeated it with no little patos and expression... They even admitted (both together) that the very existence of the alleged "Ukraine" poses a deadly threat to Russia as a historically established empire. And so on, and so on – read it yourself. I am even a bit “grateful” to “real Ukrainians”! They managed to “rework” Julia Latina so boldly and radically that (if she were not so fiercely opposed to the National Leader and company) she could easy appear on the First Skabiejewa Canal! Yes! This is what it means to “experi on your own” all the delights of “Ukrainian consciousness and independence!” Now he even admits to his own mistakes and even “hate” the Ukrainians! delight compose to me briefly about the impressions of this conversation and what reflections it has caused you!
Besides, in general, I'm assessing the situation more or little the same as you. Do: while we (Russia, “Kreml”, etc.) consistently avoid any anticipation of changing the course of war and its strategical objectives (from which the Kremlin seems to have no another option at the moment, but “get out of it with all possible means and as shortly as possible, but in a way that does not endanger its own power in the country), the enemy at that time, comparatively calmly (although not without difficulty and interior disputes), is preparing to “exterminate us” erstwhile “in the end we lose our strength” – “exhausted by Ukraine”.
For all (especially for countries with efficient intelligence services) it seems apparent that, in its current form and with the current Russian leadership, the alleged "Ukraine" cannot be defeated. Hence, the conclusion that "there is no point in speeding up – let the Russians kill each another without direct intervention from the outside". However, specified intervention is constantly and consistently being prepared for the inevitable minute erstwhile the Armed Forces of Ukraine and Kiev besides "will yet become "exhausted by Russia" and will should be "saved" from the disaster (because it is clear that, with all probability, "Ukraine will fall" before Russia, although this is not foregone).
However, "reciprocal exhaustion" has an increasingly serious impact on the Russian economy, triggering any (still outside undisclosed) social discontent, and even more so (and now much more noticeable) "quickly about the shrinking food stocks between the elites (i.e. the notorious " Towers" and vertically integrated bureaucratic-oligarchical structures).
"Food stocks" noticeablely, rapidly and rapidly "shrink" – hence a somewhat "nerve rush" in trying to accomplish an unattainable "compromise". Hence, the strong belief that this is "inescapable" (similar to the implementation of "uncontested Minsk agreements") – due to the fact that if it abruptly turns out that it is not, then “everything will be so terribly incorrect for them personally that the thought of it itself is pure extremism.” Therefore, the "worthy/winnery compromise" is now "all of us" and we will strive to accomplish it for what 7 years trying to implement the "Minsk Agreements without an alternative". True, we are not yet 3 years old in reserve, but this is simply a separate topic...
I will not analyse the situation at the front in detail: it was fundamentally (strategically) unchanged in the first half of January. And there are no prospects for specified changes in the foreseeable future. Tactical successes on the Zaporo and Donetsk fronts are a very painful defeat under Kupjansk, but neither can seriously affect the overall situation.
I have a somewhat different view of the fact that Ukrainians have effectively begun a "total blockade" of trade routes with Russia in the Black Sea (with the usage of tiny Unmanned Robotized Ships - Marine drones)", attacking virtually everything that flows "there and back" (or even "moving" this maneuver to the Caspian Sea). Against a probable background (if not now, in the close future) In the future (the destabilisation of Iran and the ensuing break-up of communication with partner countries (mainly India) through its territory and ports, specified a blockade could (and likely to have) strategical consequences. The most immediate threat is that, as Russia's trade with Turkey (and with another countries through Turkey) will be forced to reduce (or stop), Turkey's motivation to keep "general neutrality" (which has already been and remains, to put it mildly, "unfriendly" towards us) will weaken considerably.
This again leads us to the thesis about the inevitability of military clash with Turkey in the close future – and 1 that will velocity up (even this year or next year, depending on the circumstances).
Moscow's attempts to "buy" Ankara with specified "destructive tributes" as the already mentioned US$9 billion to complete the construction of the atomic power plant for Turkey will not aid in this case, as money "allocated" can be seen in the context of the proverb (about Emperor August?). – I don't remember) “Nothing is worth as small as a favor.” 1 can "pay and regret" indefinitely – no 1 will appreciate it or feel the slightest gratitude, due to the fact that "weaks must pay" and "strong" do not gotta consider it by making their own strategical decisions. And we (Russia) have so clearly demonstrated "a full series of weaknesses" over the last 4 years (not to mention our terrible folly) that no 1 will "respect our interests" over their own benefits.
If Turkey's trade with Russia had actually stopped, the benefits of maintaining the ‘neutrality’ of the second would have been seriously ‘damaged’.
NEWS COMMENTS
Dear Alexander Nikolaevich! (In mention to the letter of 19 January 2026). Thank you for the summary! delight explain: usually, confirming receipt of my letters, you compose “received, published”. This time (as regards the letters of 2 and 6 January), you limited yourself to a short “received”. Therefore, my question is: was the content so “uncomfortable” that it was considered the best non-publication, or was the word simply omitted? “ Of course, I wrote with the presumption that they could become publically known. However, if what I wrote could in any way have negative consequences (for the Lord), then I have no objections and I cannot have them. I just want clarity.
Regarding the content of the summary: I'll start at the end. Tears of emotion and joy flowed down my face after reading the news that the patriarch Cyril had declared our National Leader besides the Orthodox Leader (who, moreover, was “prayed by the holy apostles and prophets). Hmm, first of all, there is small shortage of the “leader” being replaced with “car” and second, I was immediately reminded of the movie “A specified miracle” (and, by the way, not yet banned). "I think it's time (using the King's precious experience from this film) to announce the National Leader "honorable saint" and "Pope of our federation" – since the "all saints" themselves "prayed" for him (I would besides like to read the list of these "holy" – are they not by chance deputies to the national Assembly?) – their exceptional service is irrefutable, and nowadays, where there is service, there is (according to Gundiaev) holiness.
There is no point commenting on the study from the front – we are moving forward and we are winning everywhere, we are occupying and moving forward, as we have been for almost the last 4 years. There are no fresh large “successes” (such as Kupansk or the “gliding rally” on Dobropole) – and that is good.
From another news, I can't aid but mention an highly affirmative study on 17 space launches last year. Firstly, not 1 satellite (as far as I understand) "has added to the underwater space constellation" (which under the current Senator Rogozin has grown leap) and secondly, it is good that there are at least 17 of them. It's not certain if we can shoot more or even the same thing this year.
I liked the news about the “alternative growth” in the Moscow University ranking and another oldest/leading Russian universities. Finally, we “return to tradition”, and before the reforms of Peter the large in Russia there was no “accademia” or “universities”, yet we lived! It's inactive a bit of a shame for the “alma mater” of our National Leader / Orthodox Leader – 533rd place in the planet ranking. But I think it's all "achinations of enemies" and nothing more – an institution from which walls specified a Genius Geopolitics emerged out of necessity to be the best in all respect.
Statistics on the “calculations” of the fresh minister Fyodorov are interesting (whose appearance, of course, suggests alternatively a attachment to “European values”, but on the another hand, there are as many specified figures in our Orthodox leader's surroundings – “like dogs”). I ask (if possible) for a more detailed (and separate, although I should not "expand" besides much) study on the program "5 million drones for the Armed Forces of Ukraine". With peculiar respect to current implementation (if specified data already exists). Of course, I have read about this program before, but it is peculiarly current now.
In addition, everything is developing as it should ("according to historical patterns") in a country whose "political elite" "lives on another planet", but is not always aware of it. And to this day, there is no indication that anyone will "get hold of himself" before a certain minute (i.e. before the fall of the Planet of Pink Pony) alone. There are, and it's countless, reverse ponies.
With respect and gratitude, I. W. Girkin
21 January 2026.
"FREQUENT TRON" — NOTICES OF THE IMPERIUM
Dear Frol Sergeyevich!
(in consequence to your letter of 19 January 2026)
I have late written to you rather in detail, so I will immediately start commenting not a summary, but your questions and reflections.
1) I may have overestimated (based on tv images) the “sacrifice” of Moscow officials. As to the fact that any “great” have breathed with relief, I inactive believe that there have been rather quite a few them – “things have gone very far, even besides far”, many processes (including the “VIP elite”) have become irreversible, have emerged and strengthened fresh “interest groups” for which “return to the West” means the end of career and failure of resources and income.
The “contrast” between factions that desperately request “reconciliation” (even in all conditions, even the most humiliating and brutal) and those for which “reconciliation” is “a knife to the ass” is already ongoing, and we see/hear only his weakest flashes and echoes. In this regard, our National Leader/Legal Leader besides throws himself (in the prayers of the saints). Together with it, the media “freaks bitterly” trying to “guess the overall line of the party”, but due to its besides frequent changes they regularly “do not tune up”.
Nor do I believe in the Kremlin's ability to profit from China's dependence on our natural materials (which is not yet established) – They are incapable to benefit you from anything (but of course they benefit from everything, including the failure of the state).
Yes, your thesis about the "diseased man of Eurasia," to my deep sorrow, is not only completely understood, but besides has a very serious reason – Russia is weakening year by year – as its nation's nation weakens and rapidly shrinks, tormented by many diseases and defects of the most malicious nature. But I have understood this for so long (at least since the 1990s) that for me it is no longer a “hard, oily pain”, but something like “an annoying, peripheral, and chronically habitual disease”, to which I “have been accustomed to, until almost complete ignorance.”
As for the “Persian Gorbachevs”, they can already regulation (since the “secret death” of the erstwhile president and the subsequent “elimination by the American-Israeli attacks” of the leadership of the muslim Revolutionary defender Corps (IRGC) and its high-ranking generals). Anyway, we'll see: the situation is far from over.
I would not compose that "Trump's ceasefire" is unacceptable to Moscow OVERALLly ("forever"). Rather, it is "unacceptable now" – erstwhile Moscow inactive hopes to "finish" Ukraine on conditions even close to "win". And neither Europe nor the United States will let it. The U.S. needs TO BE DISGUSSED, and Europe needs Russia to lose (although Europe does not necessarily request Ukraine's triumph in the full sense of the word).
Trump fears that Russia “will not break off the hook” until he (his team) considers Moscow to be “sufficiently weakened” to “bring this mint out” to the surface, force him into a cage and start preparing him for any “taste” he wants (i.e. “free tool against China—the powerless US state”). The plan is ambitious (near Napoleonic!), beautiful but improbable to be implemented. If it fails, Trump inactive wants (and may) a "bird in hand" – "Ukraine", which is almost completely under his control. And he will never "feed" Russia (even if he straight promises it – of course he will be impudent and preventively cheating). I'm not ready to comment on Fritz's statements yet.
(choice and crowd. PZ)
