When he asked whom he trusted, he admitted that no one, after a while he added that to God. – But it is the Lord God from the computer, the highest class of wisdom – stated (Walesa)
Below is the abusive text of another believer of the Lord God from Computer.
Mr. Hartman suggests GPT is Gepetto? The creature would like to take the place of the Creator, I know...
I never liked that story...
And Philip the Golar was a horror movie.
This is, of course, a crooked mirror, John did not give people sophisticated technology due to the fact that he knew that human imperfection would turn against us. He was waiting...
And so it is that we now have hell on earth due to uncontrolled access to SI
- unauthorized. Greedy, jealous, small, unreasonable, and arrogant - that's why snobs sign - ROT SZILD.
No 1 knows what that name truly means...
In fact, SI is not a threat, only people who usage it - and the fact that SI is to be/is trained on people who are imperfect, who have defects, sometimes bad...
The thought to teach SI on the sewers that are full of net is the worst option possible - this is greed in pure form - "because for free and quickly, on a mass scale..."
So SI human imperfection will lead to perfection - it will be perfectly imperfect, perfectly greedy, perfectly malicious, it will be the devil incarnate... or possibly it has already happened, due to the fact that isn't hell on earth now?
I would like to point out that the author (almost) does not tell us anything - he is projecting his ideas on another people.
And 1 more thing - you should be truly simple to cultivate specified idolatry.
My comment - as usual in this color
Jan Hartman: Artificial intelligence is more than revolutiondate_range2024-10-28 07:00:00
For a while now. I feel bad. I realized that if I fed the algorithm with my own texts and a tiny library, he could start producing “my” books and articles. Even I wouldn't know I didn't compose it. It is worth that the doctor besides realizes that shortly he will only assist the diagnostic algorithm, the poet and the composer – that he will learn what the real creation and authenticity is from the algorithm aimed at "originality" and "authenticity", the justice with the lawyer – that the device will conduct the trial a small better than they will and issue a more reliable conviction than a court of blood and bones. And so on - especially for RadioKraków writes prof. Jan Hartman as part of our subject of the week "Artificial Intelligence: what it gives us, what it takes us".
Yes, we definitely see here idolatrous worship for Usurpator - the question, where did it come from?
People like to lift themselves up to the heavens, but... a individual who "on a regular basis" in his publicist defies people, here he puts himself as a humble servant...
This is the end of man as the “Lord of creation”
Now the creature is expected to be you?
This is the end of man as the “Lord of creation”
Now the creature is expected to be you?
The emergence of artificial intelligence is more crucial than the breakthroughs we know so far: steam engine, iron railway, automotive or even the Internet. This is the end of man as “the master of creation.” shortly we will feel like worse versions of "chat", slow and with the effort of issuing mouth sounds not of the highest quality. And no 1 will care that we “feel”. Nothing more private and individual than that you just felt something erstwhile you said something or wrote it. There'll just be protein brains, silicon brains, and God knows what else. So you'd better choice up a robot that'll hug you and cheer you up, 'cause these are tough times!
This gentleman knows something - he knows for a long time, and now that GPT has become public - he's drunk on his "knowledge"...
I think he's been made more aware of than Wales...
There's no shortage of a spell. erstwhile we have a fear of a device that He does everything better than we do.IT specialists provide: it's just a machine! But what if the machine, erstwhile it writes beautiful poems, does discipline and diagnoses diseases? I guess. Only sweeping ourselves we can do betterBut it's only due to the fact that a robot powered by artificial intelligence would be besides costly and there's no reason to make it. (Oh, dear! But these machines are already here! Elon Musk just showed them to us...). Yeah, it's a disaster.
As a professor, I can see it in my hand. In the memorable year 2023, universities and schools around the planet gave up writing. Really?Their level has increased dramatically since most students brought plagiarism. Really?Now they bring the products of free versions of programs called language models, and in fact, mostly the GPT Chat. I don't know why I'm writing without the aid of the "Dream". possibly due to the fact that even about by next year my texts will be more "human" and more interesting than patchworms sewn from the "reply" GPT hut. But what happens in 2 years? It remains to hope for the mercy of editors-in-chief for pre-retirement publicists. In another industries, the case is not better.
The social and civilizational consequences of artificial intelligence (SI) present are 1 of the most lively topics discussed. Nor can it be said that governments and global organisations do not see the problem. Moreover, in futuristic speculation mode, the SI issue has been discussed by philosophers since at least the 1980s. Nevertheless, the advancement of reflection and regulation is definitely not keeping pace with the improvement of fresh applications that amaze us and even shock us with their fresh capabilities, making us Almost all period we experience the same thing: delight combined with disbelief and fear This gentleman knows something - he knows for a long time when we look at fresh developments in this area. But most of the time we are dealing with inventions made available on the free market, While advanced software, utilized by scientists, military or police, surely has even more possibilities.
Paradoxically, present we have rather good forecasts for individual applications
SI and alternatively detailed recommendations on how to usage and how to prevent it from being utilized unethically, but they are inactive "dentless" documents. We are very far from influencing the reality of communication and the global labour marketplace in specified a way as bioethics affected the reality of treatment and medical experiments involving people.
Threat of marginalisation
From an ethical point of view, the biggest problem with SI is the threat of marginalisation and socio-professional degradation of a large part of humanity. It's not actual - A immense crowd of people doing all kinds of intellectual work can lose the occupation that computers will take, just as physical work replaced machines. That's not true! - The biggest threat is the control of SI over people like in Saturn 3 It must be said that the turbulent and unrighteous process of industrialisation and mechanization of production yet brought large benefits to humanity, liberating it to a large degree from low-paid and stupidity. This, however, gives no warrant that it will be the same with intellectual work.
In the long term, we will most likely besides find ourselves in a situation where moral space, or the community of intelligent beings connected with each another with moral bonds of commitment, will be extended by various kinds of extrahuman beings – machine, organic or hybrid. What's more, some specified beings will not have the subjectivity attached to any individual physical object, specified as the human body (or animal) or machine, but the entity distributed, networked, or even a contract, postulated.
in my opinion, he knows everything - he does not speculate that there will be different forms of being, he simply writes that any will have (de facto he should compose - they have - due to the fact that he knows it) peculiar subjectivity
Dispersed subjectivity is, of course, the ability to pass from the body to the body, that is to say, to lingering...
Like what?
He's gonna keep doing it.
He's gonna jump from man to man and do whatever he wants!
Unfortunately, apart from the result of the philosophical debate on the anticipation of the SI obtaining something of a kind of feeling and consciousness, it is apparent that to recognise in the second essence its moral subjectivity (called dignity today) it is not essential to resolve early any ontological issue (Is SI a reasoning entity or not?), as this happens spontaneously.
And if in the future any of us hold back Showing respect non-human beings acting intelligently on the basis of dogmatic belief that they feel nothing and think nothing, It will be ideologically motivated violence, akin to what the conquistadors erstwhile permitted, refusing to admit in the “Indians” people.
That's why they advance homosexuality and all that stuff!
also "right" of animals!
To make it easier for you to presume that the SI has a personality and should be "respected"!
Now it makes sense!
It's a hucpa!
He's trying to fool us by tiny steps, by frog cooking.
In principle, if we are not prejudiced, We consider all being who talks to us to be intelligent. and possessing his dignity. !!!Speeching doesn't mean intelligence. - Qui-Gon Jinn 😙 I knew this conviction in the movie didn't just happen... and how those words of the prof. relate to his earlier words: "low-paid and stupidity." Maybe he just doesn't talk to fools? We do not know the world, we do not know the culture or community in which it does not exist, and in which deviations from this rule are not related to force and injustice. confabulation
"Resecured Brains", "posthumous avatars" and "virtual creators"
We have a long drive ahead of us. It inactive matters to us whether something is happening “in real time” is simply a recording, whether or not an SI creation, was said by a peculiar man or generated by an “awatar”. It doesn't substance to us whether we perceive to a part written by a composer or possibly generated by a machine. All the more crucial to us is whether we communicate with someone inactive alivewhether or not we may participate in a fake communication with a program adapted for posthumous communication “in style” of the deceased. Yeah, all kinds of things like "scanned brains", "posthumous avatars" and "virtual creators", are present on the brink of reality and futurological fantasy.Certainly not, and surely he knows it, it most likely was so - humanity has achieved the ability to transform the head into a hard disk, and John has returned to the first form of being - which is fuller, gives the sea possibilities Their position is double spectral, which makes our ability to take them seriously even less. For now, we like to talk about the current and real possibilities of SI, nevertheless erstwhile it comes to breaking the barrier of the brain-computer, although to "scan the brain" far away,the technology of reading phonenetized thoughts (so-called interior speech) already worksand supports the paralyzed, incapable to speak.
It is advanced time to reflect on a planet where music and literature will be created by machine, most frequently on order and according to the preferences of the recipient, the physical presence of the second man will not be a strong and dominant standard of communication, and The story of an unforgivable “human genius” and “authentic emotions” will be a cultural monumentthe meaning of which can be asked ‘language model’. Will this planet inactive admit right and incorrect in a moral sense? Will there be honour, generosity, and goodness in it, even though it is work and honesty? I dare uncertainty it.
What did I tell you?
We have a long drive ahead of us. It inactive matters to us whether something is happening “in real time” is simply a recording, whether or not an SI creation, was said by a peculiar man or generated by an “awatar”. It doesn't substance to us whether we perceive to a part written by a composer or possibly generated by a machine. All the more crucial to us is whether we communicate with someone inactive alivewhether or not we may participate in a fake communication with a program adapted for posthumous communication “in style” of the deceased. Yeah, all kinds of things like "scanned brains", "posthumous avatars" and "virtual creators", are present on the brink of reality and futurological fantasy.Certainly not, and surely he knows it, it most likely was so - humanity has achieved the ability to transform the head into a hard disk, and John has returned to the first form of being - which is fuller, gives the sea possibilities Their position is double spectral, which makes our ability to take them seriously even less. For now, we like to talk about the current and real possibilities of SI, nevertheless erstwhile it comes to breaking the barrier of the brain-computer, although to "scan the brain" far away,the technology of reading phonenetized thoughts (so-called interior speech) already worksand supports the paralyzed, incapable to speak.
It is advanced time to reflect on a planet where music and literature will be created by machine, most frequently on order and according to the preferences of the recipient, the physical presence of the second man will not be a strong and dominant standard of communication, and The story of an unforgivable “human genius” and “authentic emotions” will be a cultural monumentthe meaning of which can be asked ‘language model’. Will this planet inactive admit right and incorrect in a moral sense? Will there be honour, generosity, and goodness in it, even though it is work and honesty? I dare uncertainty it.
What did I tell you?
Prof. dr. hab Jan Hartman - flozof, publicist, academic teacher at Collegium Medicum UJ. In the past, besides politicians. Author of many books (including collections of articles and textbooks), from various fields of doctrine – ontology, metaphilosophy, bioethics, ethics.
---------
28.10.2024 14:13
Radio Kraków ends a controversial experiment. The liquidator has succumbed to public pressure
They were expected to be 3 months, but OFF Radio Kraków gave up its "experiment" after a week. The liquidator withdrew from co-creation of content by artificial intelligence announced the results of his actions.
OFF Radio Kraków, which was co-founded by artificial intelligence for a week, returns to the earlier expression of radio mainly musical - the editor-in-chief, the liquidator of Radio Kraków Marcin Pulit, reported at the beginning of the week.
In his opinion, the experimental task had already fulfilled its objective, which led to discussion.
"In OFF Radio Kraków we end with broadcasts created by journalists with the participation of artificial intelligence, we return to the expression of the programme mainly musical, broadcast inactive online and in the DAB+ system" - said the liquidator of Radio Kraków, in the structures in which OFF Radio Kraków operates.
It was expected to be a quarter. They finished after a week.
We assumed that this task would last up to 3 months. After a week, however, we collected so many observations, opinions, conclusions that we considered that its continuation was aimless- informed Pulit.
As he stressed, from the beginning the task was to be a voice in the debate on the opportunities and threats posed by the improvement of artificial intelligence, due to the fact that the mission of public radio is to observe changing reality, to ask questions, to provoke discussions about civilizational challenges.
This was the goal of the radio experiment, which was part of the debate under the slogan "Artificial Intelligence. What gives us, what takes us." And it worked.
– noted the liquidator.
High level of emotion
Pulit added that the scale of interest in the task in the niche, internet-digit program outside the main antenna of the regional station was surprising. This showed, in his opinion, how many areas are unregulated - image protection, recognition of content created with AI support, copyright.
We were besides amazed by the level of emotion that was accompanied by this experiment, the attribution of nonexistent intentions and actions, sharps are formulated on the basis of false reports
said Pulit.
As he estimated, the radio had taken care of the clear marking of content generated utilizing AI tools from the beginning and clearly communicated that it did not intend to replace people with a machine. Still, according to the liquidator, experienced the operation of the post-truth mechanism, resulting in facts lose meaning in comparison with a communicative that appeals to the emotions of the audience and their individual beliefs. "For us, radio people, and the full journalistic community in Poland this should be an crucial lesson" - stressed Pulit.
Research ongoing
The liquidator besides reported that OFF Radio Kraków is the subject of investigation by prof. Stanisław Jędrzejewski from the Kozminski Academy and a group of scientists from the Jagiellonian University.
AI is and will be more and more present in our lives. In the coming years Poland is waiting to make legal standards, specifying the usage of artificial intelligence. Our experimentation showed how many issues request to be regulated, and our radio experiences can be utilized during the work on the bill was summed up by Marcin Pulit.
From zero to nationwide popularity
OFF Radio Kraków began operating in 2015. This is simply a channel broadcast on the Internet, in digital technology, and the scope of its reception is - as the liquidator noted - comparatively small, "with close listening to zero".
The announcement that this radio would be co-created by artificial intelligence triggered a wave of comments.
The Ministry of Digital Affairs was besides curious in the topic. People who previously created OFF Radio Kraków, in an open letter, reported that respective people lost their jobs in connection with the fresh expression of the station in early September. Pulit demented these reports and stated that "no 1 due to the introduction of artificial intelligence tools was released from Radio Kraków".
On Radio Kraków is working on the preparation of the fresh software expression OF OFF Radio Kraków, at the beginning of next year the channel will have a fresh release. The program is to be addressed mainly to young people, it will most likely be co-created by students.
Off.radiokrakow.pl/newsy/jan-hartman-artificial-intelligence-to-more-niz-revolution
Right Eye: Wałęsa: "Lord God from the computer"
Radio Kraków ends a controversial experiment. The liquidator bowed under public force | Independent.pl
On Radio Kraków is working on the preparation of the fresh software expression OF OFF Radio Kraków, at the beginning of next year the channel will have a fresh release. The program is to be addressed mainly to young people, it will most likely be co-created by students.
Off.radiokrakow.pl/newsy/jan-hartman-artificial-intelligence-to-more-niz-revolution
Right Eye: Wałęsa: "Lord God from the computer"
Radio Kraków ends a controversial experiment. The liquidator bowed under public force | Independent.pl
