Krzysztof Szymanski on tv in Poland24.
– I think we've been watching a full series of fickles for months now, specified an acrobatics exercise performed not only by Prime Minister Tusk, but besides by Minister Bodnar.
All attempts made in the justice strategy rise doubts rather widely. The withdrawal of the countersignature – I wonder, on what basis can 1 say that specified a countersignature can be withdrawn? I don't know that legal basis.
Of course, I'm not a justice as highly qualified as some. For example, prof. Chmaj or prof. Zoll besides spoke very critically about the Prime Minister's action, claiming that there was no basis for this withdrawal. It's not just a message of will. The countersignature is constitutionally protected.
In fact, giving a countersignature already in itself results immediately, it is published in the Polish Monitor, so in fact there is no anticipation to retreat anything at this moment.
I don't realize how you can talk for so many years about wanting to reconstruct the regulation of law, while erstwhile you come to power, it falls over? Without any respect for legalism, without any respect for existing public institutions, e.g. a tribunal, e.g. a court. You're questioning the rulings, claiming that they're on the another team, and we don't want to play with them, so we don't.
We are thus leading Poland to any parallel legal system, a parallel political system. And is that the gold recipe of Tusk and Bodnar for justice? If so, I am very troubled, which way it leads.
For respective months now, we have been observing a series of fickles performed by Tusk and Bodnar.
They were expected to reconstruct the regulation of law, and they chose the way of a "fighting democracy", which simply means breaking the law, breaking the constitution.
The last example of the withdrawal of the countersignature shows that both... pic.twitter.com/gHHFw00nss
