It's a Truism that we live in a time where much has been put on our heads, and frequently it's something that seems average that is considered controversial and something that is better not to talk out. For any groups, criticism is not welcome, referred to as hate, any form of phobia, or a celebrated “talk of hate” which is in fact impossible to define. Writing the apparent can end in ostracism, and sometimes in receiving threats. Of course, there are smaller tools in the form of proverbial carrots, or grants for "appropriate" research, and scientists touching circumstantial taboos, even if (or possibly especially) they have strong arguments, are not invited to conferences. As part of Inclusion, those who do not have it on their lips are excluded from discussions. As part of the fight against racism, it is stated that only white people can be racist. And anyone who breaks out on 1 issue can be considered as the same enemy as the 1 who was designated as the enemy from the very beginning. Nobody shoots (yet?), but the request for tribute is clear. The same dilemma as always, between easy and right. But apart from the circumstantial “bubbles” where it is branded, it seems that the average man does not see the ongoing panic and does not see that any minute of choice has come. Then the choice will be harder.
First Marxism
The association of Marxism with the ideologies of the modern planet has already been commanded by many. Bishop Krzysztof Karoń repeatedly emphasized that there is no specified thing as political correctness, but only Marxist terror. The activities of the Frankfurt School (though not only) led to the creation of fresh replacement proletariats, which are intended to give impetus to a fresh revolution in the name of fresh victims. Thanks to the tactics of taking over cultural institutions and all social institutions in the alleged Long March by the Institutions (Antonio Gramsci's idea), the situation present looks like and can be created any victim due to its affiliation with a discriminated number (and frequently this discrimination is partially or even completely deposed) and in its defence harassment of the perpetrator. Here it is worth mentioning Herbert Marcuse and his concept of repressive tolerance (i.e., in rule average but without revolutionary potential) opposed to liberating tolerance, which requires the affirmation of a minority, giving even the approval to attack for this intent a reactionary majority, which tolerates the number repressively actually gives her a surviving in peace and discourages the tolerated number from revolutionary overthrow of social relations. So the full emancipation of whether women within the framework of the second wave feminism (not entirely related to the understandable demands of first wave feminism) or homosexuals, and then transsexuals and all non-binal individuals (in short thrown into the common LGBT bag) has purely Marxist genealogy.
This short description seems essential to me, although I am aware that I am writing alternatively to people acquainted with alleged right-wing journalists, any of whom have addressed at least any of these topics and whether the tolerance of repressive or Long March by the institutions and readers has met with these issues. An interesting subject of creating victims and utilizing them to postulate revolutions (especially in the US) was Łukasz Winiarski “Razprozak” in his debut book “Anti-communist Manifesto”. The book is worth noting due to good preparation of the subject, drawing attention to how far modern Marxism has come (also in Polish conditions thanks to the alleged pedagogy of shame), as well as many examples of how media, universities and organizations are able to make a story of sacrifice for a common thief. Despite its publicistic style, cut language, ubiquitous humour and many comparisons (which despite its number did not bore me, specified is the creative author) The winemaker presents situations where everything is over.
For example, college officials defend the thief and only perceive to his communicative though he beat up with his cashier friends who caught him in the act. Moreover, they appeal to shopkeepers not to study theft if the thief does so for the first time and before establishing the facts, there are many students who play the racism card and call for a boycott of the store. The university publically praises its courageous student protesters who defends a fellow thief. Shopkeepers win a million-dollar settlement after years, but it's little loud. They did not go bankrupt due to the sacrifice of workers who frequently agreed to long wait for pay.
The “Razprozak” besides truly shows many examples of authorities they teach at universities, they compose for readable newspapers, which can compose about the eradication of white race, dreaming about killing white people, etc. And they're inactive the authorities. To say that only white can be racist is simply a standard in the United States. At the same time, people are told to believe in white supremacy and systemic racism erstwhile racism towards white people is not uncommon at all. besides interesting are the many cases of people who, for publicity and the position of the victim, left threats for themselves, and were moved to repent by proven guilt and the anticipation of criminal responsibility.
There is besides a chapter on LGBT precursors who are adored by their successors, though they should be hidden (as it would seem) even for tactical reasons. The mention to pedophiles listed in 1 chapter, but besides intellectuals who called for the legalization of pedophilia in the 1970s in France (such loud names as Jean-Paul Sartre and Michel Foucault appear there in a wide and well-known group).
Book, published by the “Highest Time” I highly recommend.
Racism is not a racial issue
Years ago, the creators of the tv series South Park joked that erstwhile a black man kills a white man or a black man, it's a homicide, but erstwhile a white man kills a black man, it's a hatred crime. Houellebecq in the “Capacities of the Island” wrote about a comedian who lived around present (this book was written earlier due to the fact that it was published in 2005) wonders what topics he might exploit in his performances and 1 option was to stir the thread of anti-racism, or alternatively anti-white racism.
The “Black Lives Matter” movement, which, by manipulating the name itself, tends to prosecute a racial war alternatively than a level playing field, is led by women who themselves say they are Marxists (this, too, can be read in the book recommended above). It's very important. I don't want to make it seem like it's the blacks with their ridiculous reactions that now request life at the expense of whites, eternal cayana, and peculiar treatment, and that's the full point. If black people request it and think it's fair, they do so due to the fact that they besides became a proletariat of the fresh revolution. alternatively of being scholars that you gotta learn, effort and work, there are scholars of infidelity into their abilities, but it is dressed in better-sounding slogans of rewarding past wrongs or being a victim of the system, which you can't jump over and only systemic solutions, alternatively than (God's weapons) working on yourself and effort can give something in life.
Such raised people plunder shops after George Floyd's death and are not punished. Politicians and journalists explain them, but we inactive gotta believe in systemic racism and the threat of white supremacy if only the president becomes the incorrect one. And so is another minorities. It is possible to convict the organizer of the picket for “disfailing” LGBT groups even if the data he published are not called into question, but LGBT groups are officially persecuted. No protective umbrella over any number makes you conclude that they are not persecuted at all if they cannot be criticized. That requires an Orwell double thought.
That's why I don't blame people who believe in specified propaganda. It is Marxists who usage more minorities for their own purposes. There's no request to emotionally turn against black or homosexuals as specified due to the fact that they're programmed by propaganda and activists. But they're not the only ones. After all, this and the reactionary majority are put to sleep. And he's not responding. By doing so, we are giving up further positions and it can only happen that opposition will increase erstwhile both the media, the state authorities, global authorities, have achieved specified a position that this opposition cannot be effective. Sometimes, possibly paradoxically, opposition grows if you effort to carry out a revolution besides violently. People can pretend that marriages can be both bisexual and monosexual. It can be kept quiet, but revolutionaries sometimes accelerate and then gotta go back. The problem is that, after specified a reversal, alertness decreases again and can decision forward. Feeling on the side, as pompous as it sounds, counter-revolution, I inactive have the hope that we can lead to the constant retreat of the opponent.
Terror – a fixed element
Returning to Mr. Karonia, he preached that the full essence of applicable Marxism was to bring about economical failure and to keep the strategy alive with terror. And since economical failure was the apparent consequence of the revolution, panic became an indispensable tool. However, it was not a sad necessity discovered in the course of the advancement of the revolution, but it was an indispensable component foreseen in advance. The fresh revolution has the same logic. The USSR besides began with liberalization of customs, actions of Aleksandra Kolłontaj and this similar, destructive social tissue. At the same time, physical and intellectual panic was present. In time Stalin ended the era of the sexual revolution erstwhile he became a fresh Tsar. In a way, these considerations led to an thought to write short stories “Miliard”, which national portal.net published in his journals.
It's the same thing this time. Sexual revolution, further attacks on the Church, household have their place and time. Persecuted by LGBT or racial Marxists, they are meant to supply an excuse for changes in law and judicial jurisprudence and to decision even further the limits of acceptable criticism, and to think about whether it is worth giving way to their opinion, since it may have any unpleasant or possibly even financial consequences, and at a further phase of the revolution and imprisonment. Reactive publicists should censor themselves. decision within safer boundaries, which will then shift, but possibly even leave any niche, if it adapts to the impression of democracy and pluralism.
Although the logic of the revolution is rather simple and the subsequent stages in general are not hard to predict, it is hard to say where we are going. In the end, we may be amazed by war or by a abrupt flashdown, and it is the populists who will start taking over another EU countries. A lot can happen. There are many actors stronger than Poland who can change the layout of the game. But if the cataclysms don't happen early enough, I'm afraid we're going to have an unequal fight in convincing the public that it's made up of proverbial cooked frogs and that it might miss the minute erstwhile it inactive has the strength to jump out of the water. It is worth reading, promoting authors who search out the fact and advance it, but also, as far as possible, giving them money so that they can carry on with as much momentum as possible. The more anti-cultural content they are taught from an early age even systematically, the more crucial books can be the exceptions to the antidote.
In the early Polish People's Republic, articles in technological journals were characterized by alleged declarative Marxism. For example, Polish archaeologists at first praised the achievements of Marxism, the first fewer footnotes included the name of Stalin himself and the titles of his technological works, and then everyone had already written an article without much connection with specified a peculiar introduction. present there are problems with the claim that only women can menstruate and bear children. celebrated was the cover of the British magazine for midwives (photo of the cover here)where the man was born). possibly shortly technological writings will besides gotta pay tribute to modern ideology, omit uncomfortable subjects, and only in a further place present the results of their research, which may have nothing to do with gender. I don't know. possibly it'll get worse, and everyone will gotta pay that kind of tribute, and even in front of their friends they'll be afraid to gag about it. It's a detailed question of precisely what it will look like. I think the problem is that the next generations will already be indoctrinated before they make critical reasoning and unlike the present adults who inactive have healthy reflexes, but they choose comfort or take any form of struggle, they will no longer be full aware of what aberrations they have been taught to believe in. We are going to make a real effort to rise the next generation. Otherwise, both states, media and pop culture will easy drag them to the side of the revolution. possibly more children will have Catholics and Conservatives. However, their opponents will have more resources to ‘bring up’ them. The case is open. possibly the revolutionary actions of the fresh government will give impetus to their opponents erstwhile the façade conservatism of the erstwhile government has lulled vigilance. As always, you gotta pray and work, and you may worry about the effects less.
