Stefan Bandera is simply a "national hero" for a large part of Ukrainians. The number of his supporters in the banderized Ukraine increases as the number of his monuments. The most celebrated monuments are located in Lviv (in Kropiwnicki Square), Tarnopol, Ivano-Frankivsk (d. Stanisławów) and another localities of the Lviv, Tarnopolski and Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast. all month, the flags of the flags of the flags of the flags of the flags of the flags of the German authorities, schools, public institutions and churches arrive. They advance flagism, banned in Europe, but not in Ukraine.
In his article, satyrik and publicist Marcin Wolski wrote that the leader of the OUN Stepan Bandera is “a demonized figure” in Poland. In his text he relativised and even justified the assassination of the Polish minister and his collaboration with the 3rd Reich commissioned by Bandera. "UN chief is simply a demonized figure, but let's effort to look at him with the eyes of a Ukrainian patriot. He fought for Ukraine and that he killed Minister Pieracki? For him, the then head of the Polish MMA was like General Berg for PPS fighters. And that he was with the Nazis? Who was he going with? With the West that put a line in Ukraine? He had the right to ally even with the devil erstwhile he fought against the invading Bolshevik.”
Stefan Bandera is the main symbol of genocide in Poles in Volyn and east Małopolska made by Ukrainian nationalists from the CNS and UPA. It is simply a symbol of Ukrainian collaboration with Nazi Germany, the real effect of which was the creation of the Ukrainian SS division “Galizen” (division regiments interacted with UPA) and Ukrainian Wehrmacht battalions “Nachtigall” and “Roland”. Although he was arrested and imprisoned by the Germans in a concentration camp in Sachsenhausen, under an informal agreement on Ukrainian-German cooperation against the Red Army he was released along with another OUN leaders by the Nazis. However, he did not return to Ukraine. After the war he stayed in Munich – under false names and disguises. His protection was to be provided by erstwhile SS.
Stefan Rowecki “Grot” and Stepan BanderaIt was unusual to stay in Sachsenhausen, due to the fact that while in isolation, he did not lose contact with his environment. The flag was held under peculiar conditions due to the fact that it hated the torment of the dark intent and the harsh rigors of the prison. He had access to the press, with the approval of the Germans, through the liaisons, he contacted his own organization and knew what was happening outside, how the CNS and UPA murdered Poles. close the camp there was a centre for training bandero-diversity staff. The guidelines of the Bandera in the country were implemented by M. Łebed, who was in office. Established by the Germans, Ukrainian auxiliary police recruited from CNS-B activists. After resolving the alleged judaic issue, the Central Provincial of the OUN-B took on the creation of armed bander militias in Volyn and Polesia. Since the beginning of 1943, the armed creation of Bandera, the alleged UPA, has joined the planned, doctrinal mass murders. The claim that Bandera did not influence the course of events is false. He never erstwhile opposed genocide. He never erstwhile protested. He agreed to the slaughter and supported it with all his might, accepting the OUN and UPA actions. Adolf Hitler did not execution anyone himself, but it is the political and ideological function of the leader that matters, not whether he personally committed violence. Today, Bandera worship is sustained at the expense of systematically suppressing the fact about the work of the CNS and UPA for genocide. The best evidence for the appearance of his arrest is the words that Himmler said erstwhile Bandera had already completed the agreement between the CNS/UPA and Abwehra during his stay in the camp. And the words were: “The request for your forced situation in fictional detention has fallen... A fresh phase of our cooperation begins... “.
So this was the finale of the “marriage” of Bandera and the bander. A miracle occurred on September 25, 1944. On that date, the decision to release Bandery and Banders was approved. On September 27, he leaves Sachsenhausen along with a group of his supporters. This fact is unprecedented due to the fact that anyone who fell into the hands of Gestapo and safety services (SD), and even more so to the concentration camp of death, was no longer released. Even erstwhile the Nazis were convinced that the captured individual was innocent. That was the common fascist practice.
This event, as well as the next one, in the biography of Bandera and Stećki is silenced by historians of the nationalist movement. And until present there is no answer to the question: why did Bandera and his supporters become so much needed by the Nazis?
Grzegorz Rossoliński-Liebe- historian, dealing with the topics of planet War II, the Holocaust, fascism and political crimes on civilians, claims after respective years of investigation that Bandera was much more supported after the war by the intelligence services of the West Germany than previously suspected.
Grzegorz Rossoliński-Liebe. Polish-German historian, associated with Berlin Friedrich-Meinecke-Institut. He studied at the European University of Viadrina in Frankfurt nad Oder, was a scholarship holder of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation. In 2012, at the University of Hamburg, he defended his PhD, devoted to the character Stepan Bandera. Author of many publications on fascism, nationalism and anti-Semitism.Bandera – allies of the USA, UK and RFN
After the war, Bander first worked with British Secret Intelligence Sernice (MI6). In exchange for financial assistance, he trained British agents and helped to decision them to the USSR. Under US pressure, the British broke up their partnership with Bandera in 1954, but Bandera's grid continued to operate in the West Germany: printing her own newspapers and books, directing her spies in the USSR, backing it with false dollars. She headed the “Free Ukrainian University” in Munich and organized anti-Soviet protest actions. 1 of the leading Ukrainian activists, Jarosław Stećko, led the Munich office of the “Antibolshevik Block of Nations”, the organization of erstwhile Nazi collaborators from Croatia, Slovakia and Ukraine, who acted as an anti-communist militant during the Cold War. The office of the Anti-Bloc of Nations organized demonstrations and anti-Soviet protests as well as global conferences. There were very strong links between ABN and the U.S. CIA.In countries specified as the USA, Canada or the United Kingdom, there were local ABN organizations. The ABN was dissolved in 1996 after fulfilling its goals, i.e. after the dissolution of the russian Union. Among another members of this organization were the Croatian Liberation Movement and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (UN-B, flag faction). As we can see, Ukrainian nationalists, not only possessed powerful protectors, but besides contributed to an global organization whose goal was to destruct the russian Union. Throughout this time, by 1960 – according to German police data – the group of banners carried out about 100 political killings in the West Germany. From the spring of 1956, Bandera, in exchange for money and weapons, worked first with Italian intelligence and then – West German. Bandera and Germany were convinced that there was a strong anti-Soviet Ukrainian underground in Ukraine and Poland. Couriers and respective militants were inactive sent to Ukraine and Poland. Finally, in 1957, Nikita Khrushchev ordered the assassination of the migration management of the CNS – Bandery and Lion Rebet. The assassination of Bandera was carried out in Munich on October 15, 1959.
Stepan Bandera utilized quite a few fake documents. For example, on 6 June 1945, he received from the Camp Committee of Mauthausen concentration camp a individual ID with the name “Stefan Popel”. According to this document, Bander was held from 15.09.1941 to 6.05.1945 in Nazi-German concentration camps and was released from Mauthausen concentration camp. He was never a prisoner there!!! Ukrainian immigrants in Germany frequently utilized nicknames at the time to avoid deportation to russian Ukraine. It is not entirely clear whether Bandera took over a pseudonym from the Ukrainian word "popil", meaning "dust", or the name of Ukrainian chess player "Stepan Popel", whose passport was allegedly stolen from his flat in Paris in 1944. 1 of them, of 15 October 1950, confirmed that he was a correspondent for the Ukrainian Independent paper surviving in Söcking. Another of February 12, 1955 came from the French paper “L’Ukraine”. In 1947, Bandera used, among others, a journalistic pass issued by the Ukrainian Tribune in Siedlce.
The question arises as to where Bandera obtained specified a multitude of false papers allowing him to constantly accept these fresh identities. 1 of the answers is the protectors, and the other, strangely enough, may be his stay at Sachsenhausen concentration camp.
It turns out that in this camp, from 1942 to 1944, in the barracks 18 and 19 separated behind the additional fence, about 140 prisoners worked on forging British pounds, passports, visas, seals and another documents
Germany does not open archives
In an interview with the portal german-foreign-policy.com Rossoliński-Liebe claims on the basis of late declassified CIA papers that no Western intelligence has supported Bandera as long as West German BND (Federal Intelligence Service). The BND financed the OUN network in Munich and Ukrainian Nazis and collaborators coming to it, besides supported the position of Bandera itself. However, German intelligence inactive does not uncover its papers on this subject.
However, declassified American records uncover the scenes of the beginnings of Bandera's cooperation with the British and Germany. Since 1949, British intelligence has helped him send Ukrainian agents to Ukraine. The British realized who they were dealing with: “It is simply a bandit, if you want to call it that, but with the hot patriotism that gives it a moral background and justification.” At the latest from 1956, the German intelligence squad worked with Bandera, and he besides knew precisely who Bandera was: "We've known him for 20 years now," wrote Heinz-Danko Herre in 1959, formerly acting in Nazi military intelligence in the USSR, and after the war he was liable for espionage in the USSR.
Rossoliński-Liebe claims that until German intelligence reveals its papers on cooperation with Bandera, it will not be possible to full explain its dimension. However, he emphasizes that no 1 else has supported Bandera as much as the BND after the war. All Ukrainian activity in Munich was possible only due to the fact that Western countries treated the Ukrainian Nazi as a partner in the fight against the USSR and the east bloc. For the historian, there is no uncertainty that the ideology of Stepan Bandera and his OUN factions drew straight from Nazi Nazism.
Watch episode one. Where to watch episode two? Information in the description or on FilmSasieds.pl
