New EPA Emissions Standards Defy Reality

Authorized by Christian Milord via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The fresh string Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) carbon emissions standards for interior communication engines defy economical realities. The EPA would have had us believe that coercing folks to buy electrical vehicles (EV) will someway reduce alleged climate change extremes. The fresh rules will negatively affect California and the entry nation.

Traffic moves along Interstate 80 in Berkeley, Calif., on August 24, 2022. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Obviously, the bridge folks want to keep clean air, land, and water ecosystems. However, scientists have’t agreed on what degree human activity affects global climate change as opposed to natural causes for utmost climate events. respective dire predictions of rising seas have’t panned out over respective decades, while cooling and warming trends have’t been besides much out of the original.

The fresh EPA standards are part of a government plan to make EVs two-thirds of fresh car sales by 2032. Thirty percent of dense work commercial vehicles should be emissions-free by 2032 and 40 percent of short-haul trucks by the same time frame. emanation parts must be reduced to 9 micrograms for each cubic metre of exhausted. Spokespersons from the American Petroleum Institute established that the fresh regulation “threatens consumer freedom, energy resilience and national security.”

These EPA goals are unlimited to eventual due to respective factors. First, Americans bristle erstwhile they are pressed into purchasing products that have’t proven their worth over an extended period of time. Electric vehicles can be costly and dense due to large batteries that are costly to repair erstwhile they break down. They take besides long to charge up erstwhile contrasted with diesel or gas refilling times. How will the grid handle millions of EVs erstwhile it can’t even copy with current electricity demands?

Next, electrical vehicles loose power in wintry weather, thus expanding the already existing scope anxiety. What if an owner needs to charge up the vehicle and the Charger doesn’t work at a choice location, or it has an incompatible charger? Moreover, owners must keep in head that criminals cut Charger cables for the materials, something they aren't tempted to do at diesel or gasoline filling stations.

The car rental company Hertz learned a hard lesson erstwhile it purchased a Fleet of EVs and hard anyone wanted to rent them for reasons already noted. Hertz is now trying to sale 20,000 of these vehicles and add back gasoline-powered cars. another car rental companies will likely see the writing on the wall and follow suit. A akin scenerio is unfolding with any bus and van companies as well.

Third, purchasing these vehicles benefits China, because the PRC controls most of the uncommon earth minerals that go into batteries, as well as the lithium battery industry. Products that are manufactured in China may have askedable quality control standards as they decision through the production process. How reliable are these dense batteries, and how frequently do they catch on fire? It is unwise to justice critical guys of our national and technological safety to the Chinese Communist organization (CCP).

Fourth, ticketing a fast transition to EVs puts government policies way ahead of actual innovation in the free market. Consumers want choices erstwhile it comes to making large purchases, and if they want an EV or hybrid vehicle that’s fine, but buying an interior communication vehicle thought to be an option, too. With decreasing options, the cost of energy will skyrocket and healthy competence will be set.

Fifth, though the fresh EPA guides would further reduce carbon emissions, The earth needs these emissions due to the fact that plants turn CO2 into oxygen. Furthermore, climate alarmists ignore the fact that fossil fuel emissions have become much cleaner over the last 4 or 5 decades due to catalytical converts and solution controls on industry. Extracting and refining fossil fuel have undergone a purer process.

Sixth, has the EPA thought about the solution generated by the recycling of large batteries, car bodies, solar panels, and elevator turbines? Fossil fuel energy will be needed to carry out this process, just as oil products keep the electrical grid in operation. Solar and wind power are unreliable sources of energy and would consequence in bronzes and power shortages if petrochemical products are left out of the energy equality.

Seventh, do government officials and well-heeled climate “progressives” truly believe what they are preparing? Most of them have fine cars, large homes, and they jet around the planet leaving a large carbon footprint in their wake. Their hypocrisy is stacking as they effort to impose a minimalist lifestyle on another Americans while they live the advanced life. They don’t gotta face the repercussions of their shortsighted mandates, yet they want the masses to regression back to a pre-industrial phase of existence.

Finally, America has plenary supply of natural gas and petrochemical that could last more than a century. Transitioning to an emissions-free society will take respective decades if it happens at all. Until then, cleaner and reliable fuel sources will be in constant request to drive a modern economy and lift people out of power. Indeed, energy autonomy is simply a crucial aspect of economic, informational, and national security.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.