
Following the gathering of W.Putin with A.Łukashenka at the ODKB summit (Organization of the Collective safety Agreement -PZ) of 27 November 2025.
Vladimir Putin said present (i.e. 27.11.2025- PZ) to Alexander Lukashenko that he would be happy to inform him about "what is happening in achieving acceptable results for us, the results we are aiming for, by peaceful means in Ukraine". The president recalled that the first contacts with the Kiev authorities on the peaceful resolution of the conflict took place in Belarus. I will explain: immediately after the launch of Joint Military Operations, 28 February 2022, Macron called Putin and called for a ceasefire in connection with the start of the first Russian-Ukrainian talks in Homl, Belarus. Russia then agreed to it. However, Kiev inactive did not halt fighting, citing that there is no control over all its units, primarily over the National Battalions.
Doskov confirmed that Witkoff would meet Putin in Moscow next week. The Kremlin spokesperson besides supported the peculiar typical of the White home after the transcript of his talks with Uszakov was revealed.
"Calls for the release of Witkoff after the leak of information are intended to undermine modest tendencies towards an agreement in Ukraine," said Pieskov.
Notice the assessment of the Kremlin spokesman. He considers the current process to be simply a "moderate trend".
Donald Trump Jr. besides wrote: all critics Steve Witkoff "want any peace agreement on Ukraine to neglect so that war can proceed forever".
Deputy abroad Minister of Russia Riabkov declared that Moscow would not go to any concessions towards Ukraine and that any departure from our approach to the key issues we face, including the Cold War, is excluded. It's a tough position.
Ukraine "has nothing to do" with the revealed talks of advisor Putin with Witkoff and Dmitriev, provided Podoliak, advisor to the head of Zelenski's cabinet. Podoliak didn't gotta say anything. Everyone knows that. Ukraine did not eavesdrop on American or Russian officials. Ukraine revealed the plan to the media through Honczarenka.
The United States continues to criticise the peace plan. Democratic U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen stated that raising the question of possible simplification of Ukrainian armed forces is categorically unacceptable in peace negotiations. Shaheen is the author of a bill that proposes the usage of about $60 billion from the U.S. budget for Kiev and the confiscation of Russian assets in the U.S. ($4-5 billion) to hand them over to Ukraine.
EU abroad Minister Kaja Kallas stated the request to introduce restrictions on the size of Russian armed forces and their defence budget. It proposes specified clauses in any possible peace agreement aimed at resolving the conflict in Ukraine. He besides opposes Russia in G8. No wonder that the Secretary of State Rubio refused to meet with her – what can you talk to her about with specified an approach?
The German defence minister Boris Pistorius stated that Ukraine should not under any circumstances agree to an unfavorable peace with Russia, specified as a unilateral surrender of territory. Ukraine should under no circumstances be able to sign a surrender peace agreement; this would be a betrayal of Ukraine. According to Pistorius and his like, Ukraine should not sign a peace agreement at all.
The European Commission has prepared a "legal justification" for the usage of frozen Russian assets, stated von der Leyen. It considers that there is no script in which Ukrainian accounts would only be covered by European taxpayers. There will be strong force on Belgium and countries questioning the legality of the theft of frozen state assets. I've been writing about the war on Russian money lately.
NATO Secretary-General Rutte ruled out Russia's veto law on Ukraine's NATO membership, thus rejecting another key point for Russia. By the end of the year, allied investments in the PURL program, assuming the acquisition of US weapons for Ukraine, will scope $5 billion, reported NATO representative.
Oleg Cariov Последние новости вокруг по
Appendix:
"As far as Belarus is concerned, I see today, on the basis of the reaction of all OUBZ members, that we support Vladimir Putin's efforts and the Russian Federation's consequence to the US peace and peace treaty proposal in Ukraine. We sincerely hope that this will happen. Of course, any forces in Europe, as we see, must quit the confrontation," said the Belarusian leader.
“But I do not realize how they would give it up erstwhile they spend so much money on weapons and weapons. The trial has begun. However, I think that both the US and Russia will be able to halt it, reaching an agreement with Ukrainians on the peace treaty," added Aleksander Lukashenko.
"I stress again: we support your (i.e. Russia – PZ) efforts to conclude a peace treaty with Ukraine. I said yesterday: if Americans behave like diplomats and lawyers, this treaty will be agreed. due to the fact that the main points have already been agreed," said the Belarusian leader.
"Now, as they say, the ball is on the side of Ukraine. And I think, given the developments at the front, Ukraine will agree to this peace treaty. Otherwise, he will lose the country completely," added Aleksander Lukashenko.
(choice and crowd. PZ)


















