In the summertime of 2025, erstwhile a brutal execution was committed in Germany by an Iraqi invader on a 16-year-old girl, many were certain that the perpetrator would be sentenced to life imprisonment. This did not happen and his case sparked a wide public debate on migration policy, criminal liability and the functioning of the asylum system.
He murdered a young girl. The execution occurred on 11 August 2025 at a station in Friedland, Lower Saxony. The girl, identified in the papers as 16-year-old Ukrainian Liana K., was on the platform and spoke on the telephone erstwhile a 31-year-old Iraqi citizen approached her and as if nothing had pushed her straight under a high-speed freight train. The impact was so strong that the teenager had no chance of surviving.
A fewer days ago, the media reportedThat a man has evaded jail conviction due to the fact that of... the insanity ruling. This is another of hundreds of examples of the same practice – immigrants accused of the most serious crimes, are being mass-directed to psychiatric hospitals in Germany, which break in stitches. What's more, then they haunt the truly sick patients of these establishments.
Interestingly, in the first hours after the murder, the German services treated the substance as a possible unfortunate event. The man who led the girl to her death indicated to the police where the body lay, claiming that he “found a girl on the tracks.” That's how he avoided stopping. Only after conducting forensic investigations and detecting DNA traces on Liana's arm did the investigators find that there was a deliberate crime.
It besides turned out that the fishy had a long rejected asylum application and a deportation order was issued against him, which, however, was never executed. The man went to Germany in 2021, first applying for asylum in Lithuania, where he claimed that he was facing the death punishment due to his sexual orientation, and then continued his efforts for exile position in Germany. These claims have never been effectively documented, but have led to an extension of procedures.
By 2024, a man was already punished for inappropriate behaviour towards a female – this included unwanted physical contact and vulnerability to discomfort – for which the court fined him. However, this punishment was low adequate that it did not affect his immigration status, and the deportation order was inactive not implemented.
An crucial part of the case is that the D.A. considers the fishy to be a individual affected by paranoid schizophrenia and at the time of the incidental under the influence of alcohol. According to psychiatric experts, he was found insane, which ruled out the anticipation of charges against him that could consequence in a prison sentence. Instead, the man was placed in a intellectual institution in Moringen and is to proceed his treatment there.
The prosecutor's and court's decision has sparked a wave of criticism in both German public debate and among politicians. Co-chair of the alternate organization for Germany (AfD), Alice Weidel, openly criticized the judgment, identifying it as “scandalous” and unjust towards the victim and her family. Weidel stressed that the man who was formally obliged to leave Germany at the time of the act would not bear real criminal work or deportation, and the costs of his psychiatric treatment would be borne by the German taxpayer.
Critics of decisions besides rise wider issues concerning the functioning of the asylum strategy and the control of persons subject to deportation orders. They point out that delays in the implementation of return orders and the usage of procedural detentions against persons with rejected asylum applications may lead to situations where those who present a real threat stay in the country without effective control.
Supporters of a more liberal migration policy, on the another hand, argue that the legal strategy must take account of the complexity of individual cases and that the rulings of experts of psychiatrists are crucial to a fair penalty. Cases where intellectual illness affects the ability to realize and control their own actions must be considered in the light of nonsubjective expert assessments, even if their results are socially unpopular.
The case of Liana K.'s death highlighted both systemic gaps and social tensions related to migration policy in Germany. The victims' household and social organisations are demanding legislative changes that would improve deportation procedures and at the same time increase the protection of key values: public safety and justice for victims of crime. This debate remains open and its result may have consequences on the form of the German migration strategy in the following years.
OUR COMMENTS: A unusual coincidence, a trespasser who allegedly suffered from the deactivation of schizophrenic sanity, just after the murder, perfectly played the function of a individual unrelated to the death of his victim. That's the kind of nonsense only the utmost leftist can swallow.
We besides recommend: It's done. EU signed Mercosur
