Donald Trump threatens to win, but has not so far proposed any concrete way to dominate Democrats who have achieved perfection in falsifying elections. That's the thought Elon Musk had. Why do the followers of the god of democracy view his initiative as "controversial"?
Oh, Laboga! Gore! Democracy, ladies and gentlemen! Why? It is because, unfettered by any system, billionaire Elon Musk felt he would support Donald Trump in the election and set himself the goal of convincing voters in alleged hesitant states, on which the consequence mostly depends (this is Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin and North Carolina).
His latest thought is simply a kind of "election lottery" in which all day individual has the chance to win a million dollars. It is adequate to sign the “Petice for Freedom of Speech and the Right to Carry Arms” launched by Musk, or simply “Petice for the Constitution”. In addition to the main prize for each command of a fresh registered voter signing a petition, $47.
Before I proceed to the moral evaluation of this idea, I will callback the scene from Trump's latest rally in Pennsylvania, where a check for $1 million was received by Kristine Fishell. We have seen how this average American patriot, torn out of the crowd, whose desire is to save the country from neo-Marxist doom, shows surprise, but does not reheat her palm, she just goes onstage, hugs with Elon and thanks for his work, “which everyone appreciates.”
One would think that the thought is simply a silly whim of a rich man, but seeing this scene and the class with which Kristine reacts and proceeding Elon's words about the "American dream", we realize that it is simply a more interesting kind of fantasy, as we utilized to talk about the fantasy of Ułańska.
Timestamps of the 47 topics added by Elon Musk a fewer hours ago in Pittsburgh.
1:49 p.m. peculiar guest: Senator James McCormick
7:22 Winner of the $1 million prize
10:43 p.m. Importance of registration
11:58 hazard of assassination attacks
13:55 am The left is again free speed
17:06... pic.twitter.com/98Me7rR2uP
— ELON DOCS (@elon_docs) October 21, 2024
Is buying votes immoral?
But to the point. In the media we hear the larum that it is “unethical” that it is “a threat to democracy”. This full situation is an excellent excuse to consider the “values of democracy” that Trump's opponents are allegedly defending.
Unfortunately, we live in a time where reminding that above the law established by the democratic legislator is the more crucial law (God, natural), is simply a cry in the wilderness. We are told that these "values" or "standards" of democracy are any superior rule that should govern our public morality. But is it true?
In morality, the mention point is the objectively existing law, expressed, among another things, in the Decalogue, but preceding revelation which he received from the Lord of Israel. all civilized nation read this law by nature, and the top of the minds of our species – Aristotle – expressed it in specified an incomparable and actual manner that its discoveries lay at the foundation of all morality and Catholic civilization. So in practice, the point of mention is not for us (thinking people) any government provision, which is the fabrication of man, but the law which the Creator has established (whether we are believers and whether we call it that).
A reflection of this right is any of the provisions of the American Constitution, specified as the right to defend life and overthrow the unjust power guaranteed by the Second Amendment, prohibiting the government from restricting access to arms.
The game is not about democratic "standards" but about defending the remains of natural law in American legal culture. And this is the real point of mention that should be spoken of by rejecting the allegations of the left. It's not just that it would be a simple loser to play by their rules erstwhile they cheat and then resent the conservatives, that they besides scope for supposedly “unclean” plays. The point is, their rules are fundamentally false.
The guidelines according to which Muska is condemned for buying votes are not dictated by nonsubjective moral rules, but by the god of democracy with his false “decalogue”.
Meanwhile, America faces a dramatic conflict that, if it is lost, all elections in this country will lose meaning. He commanded this Musk, pointing out that if 1 in 20 of the millions of illegal immigrants he brought into the country of Biden were to be given the right to vote, the disparity would be so large that it would be hard to talk about the fight fair play.
"Standard" of democracy can collapse and the planet will not collapse. But – what is crucial to us – violating this standard does not automatically mean violating morality. The fact that we play “unclean” in the framework of absurd and unfair (favorous) standards of this strategy does not necessarily mean that we place any blame on our conscience.
I don't find Musk's thought immoral. This is simply a fancy (and hopefully effective!) way to make Trump's candidacy more attractive and "cool", and so trivial reasons find the majority of the votes of a democratic pack of rams. And the fact that this thought exposes the collapse of the "standards of democracy" is even worse for democracy!
Speaking to the Nazi occupier, We don't keep Jews in the basement, Poles formally spoke untruth, while morally they were not liable for it as for lying. There was a violent force on the another side, which had no legitimate authority over us and had no right to ask questions about who we were holding in the basement. Similarly, the actions of today’s unfair authority should be treated to limit our rights and destruct the remnants of the natural order.
Finally, let us reject the superstition of the “higher right” of the left!
Let's go further. We are told that we should obey authority and respect its standards. But note that paradoxically, this false notion of obedience repents more on the right than on the left. It is the left that understands that in the name of the expected "higher right" or simply right ("human rights", "women's rights" or any another invention), it can bend or even ignore the existing laws. Why doesn't he realize that right hand?
Strangely enough, it is the right-wing (or simply: decent people) to explain that they have a work to argue a power that imposes something contrary to natural law, but the left believes that it can demolish the streets of the city and the legal strategy erstwhile it wants to enforce its rations. And this should not surprise us so much, due to the fact that it is the right (not going into the details of how we attribute it) that is governed by the regulation of law, while for the left there are no transcendent rules, but only the current ideology.
That is why it is so crucial that we learn the principles on which morality has always been based, and, above all, reject those paralysing superstitions that impose power and media on us. Americans must win at all costs due to the fact that their enemy is neo-Marxist cancer, which devours the social body and destroys the state structure. The only limit to what they can afford in this fight is the Decalogue, not the confounded “standards” of democracy.
On the another hand, the electoral “loteria” should only be an introduction to the right, ingenious, but besides decisive actions. To win, it is not adequate this time to win the majority of the votes, but to win the strategy that derailed. Until he returns to the right track (through the statutory ban on all form of vote, alternatively than appearing in his own individual at the polling station and showing his identity card), the elections – which the Democrats are giving the speech – will have nothing to do with any standard of democracy, and their appropriate kind will become... a free American.
Filip Obara
See also:
CNOTA EPIKEI. If we knew about it – the government in Warsaw would tremble with fear!
