Discipline spokesperson MS makes disciplinary charges against neo-Judge Radzik and Lasota

Disciplinary Ombudsman of the Minister of Justice of the SSO Andrzej Krasnodębski after disciplinary proceedings were opened, acting pursuant to Article 114(3) of the Act of 27 July 2001 The law on the strategy of common courts decides to present charges to neojudge Przemysław Radzik and neojudge Michał Lasota.

The Disciplinary Ombudsman of MS, Mr Radzowski, alleges that:

Acting in Warsaw from July 5, 2019 until an unset date, no later than February 27, 2024, as a public officer – Deputy Disciplinary Ombudsman of the General Courts, in the course of the investigation and subsequent disciplinary proceedings he exceeded his powers resulting from his duties.

This resulted in an unwarranted rejection of the SSO in Kraków by Waldemar Żurkow of a disciplinary offence, which was to trust on the fact that on 4 July 2019 he had failed the dignity of his office due to the fact that in an interview given and published on the net portal Law.pl entitled “Judge Żurek: Kamil Zaradkiewicz wants to give citizens chaos in courts” he presented a political manifesto on views and assessments related to the functioning of constitutional authorities of the state, including the Constitutional Court and the National Judicial Council.

Next, questioning the legality of the appointment of Kamil Zaradkiewicz to the office of the neo-judge of the ultimate Court, he defined the question of law to the Constitutional Court on the position of judges appointed on the basis of the constitutionally incompatible resolutions of the National Judicial Council in 2011-2015, as a ‘law’ aimed at achieving a political objective. He then asked neo-Judge Kamil Zaradkiewicz to act in the intention(...)"to review the Court of Justice of the European Union by tasking the ultimate Court with the designated legal questions to the Constitutional Court, that is, to ask him for specified proceedings that could humiliate him in the public opinion and exposure him to the failure of assurance needed to execute the neo-Judge of the ultimate Court. He then directed against neo-Judge Kamil Zaradkiewicz the unlawful threat of future stigma and of taking work for the action "for the detriment of the State and of citizens". By doing so, he violated the rule of apoliticality of judges and the work to uphold rights, that is to say, conduct that offends the dignity of a justice and undermines assurance in his independence, independence, impartiality and violations of the principles of professional ethics.

He then made a request to the Disciplinary Court at the Court of Appeal in Katowice on 21 October 2019 to analyse a disciplinary matter, by which he falsely accused the SSO in Kraków of disciplinary misconduct, and supported this request in the course of proceedings before the Disciplinary Court at the Court of Appeal in Katowice on the signature of ASD 4/19, thereby acting against the public interest, expressing public assurance in the judiciary and in the detriment of Waldemar Żurek, thereby violating the dignity of the judge, that is to say to commit a disciplinary mistake under Article 107(1)(5)(b).

Michael Lasota Discipline Ombudsman MS accusesthat:

acting in Warsaw in the period from a nearer date, no later than 15 October 2018 to 27 February 2024, as a public officer – Deputy Disciplinary Ombudsman of the General Courts, in the course of the investigation and subsequent disciplinary proceedings he failed to comply with the work to conduct a comprehensive evidence investigation, in peculiar by obtaining the applicable information at the applicable taxation office, which resulted in the unfounded rejection of the SSO in Krakow by Waldemar Żurek of 2 disciplinary offences:

– pursuant to Article 107(1) of the Treaty, which means that ‘the dignity of the office has been impaired by failing to comply with the work to submit a declaration of civilian law taxation in the period from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 in Krakow, in connection with the sale of a tractor and by failing to comply with the work to pay taxation on civilian law acts.

in Krakow, Waldemar Żurk’s decision of 24 November 2020, in which he accused SSO in Kraków Waldemar Żurk of making a disciplinary mistake with Article 107(1)(5)(p), which means that "in the period from 23 December 2014 to 15 January 2015 in Krakow, he violated the dignity of office in specified a way that as a buyer for 42,000 PLN of the John Deere Skider tractor, despite the resulting taxation on civilian duty, in the case of filing of a taxation on civilian law, in the case of a taxation on civilian law, in the case of art.

Acting in Warsaw in the period from 23 May 2022 to a more permanent day, no later than 28 February 2024 as a public officer – Deputy Disciplinary Ombudsman of the General Courts, in the course of the disciplinary proceedings, he exceeded his powers resulting from the execution of his duties, resulting in the unsubstantiated rejection of the SSO in Krakow by Waldemar Żurek of 68 disciplinary offences which were besides exhausting by the marks of intentional crimes prosecuted by a public accusation involving the declaration of untruth in papers in the form of judgments and orders of the territory Court in Krakow, thereby affecting the public interest, expressing the assurance of citizens in the judiciary and against Waldemar Żurek, thereby violating the dignity of the judge, that is to commit disciplinary misconduct with Article 107(1)(5)(p).