Two alleged "minister" for equality, Catherine Kotuli and Lisa Paus, appeared in the media. Ladies talked about strengthening Polish-German "cooperation in the fight for equal treatment and combating violence". They even signed an agreement "to deepen bilateral cooperation to combat force against women and to guarantee the protection of LGBT+ communities".
Left hates competition
This means adding money to various “progressive” ideas and actions that actually undermine conventional values and effort to redesign society. The taxpayers' money is turned to their ‘education’ towards which they do not necessarily wish. It must be acknowledged that the left and its organisations have mastered the method of life and action from "grants", subsidies and state subsidies. erstwhile in Poland, during the reign of the Law and Justice, attempts were made to make an ideological “competition” in this area, after the change of power, this ended with the launching of prosecutors, “extractive arrests” of officials and the removal from the list of subsidized institutions of almost all entities who had something in common with, for example, Catholicism. The left has the functions of subsidiarity of the state and it hates any competition in this matter.
French example
In France, the fashion for subsidising "progressive" associations has long gone to a higher level and has become almost "art for art". For example, the state policy has late been moving towards reducing illegal immigration, while local and central budgets are moving out of money for associations supporting and bringing illegal migrants to Europe. A separate issue is LGBT and feminist associations, as well as the "fight against violence", which was discussed by the "minister" Kotul. The Seine grants for this intent have reached specified an absurd level that all control is eluded.
The example of France is an interesting illustration of the waste of public money and of the way left-wing activists “developing” in the name of “progressive” slogans. The analysis of specified activities was carried out by Élodie Messéant, a investigator at the IREF (Institute for economical and taxation Research), who questioned the effectiveness of the funds made available by the State to private law organisations whose aim is to defend women's rights. specified associations are never enough, and e.g. on October 27, their “collective feminist associations” published in the paper “Le Monde” an appeal to... increase funds for “prevention, listening and supporting victims of violence”. However, many public reports show that specified organisations are already receiving colossal grants, no effects can be seen, and in addition, the effectiveness of specified activities is not monitored.
Bottomless Well
Messeant argues that the number of grants awarded at different levels does not even let them to be counted accurately. A large part of them is "violence against women". According to a study by the Women's Foundation, the state's aid for specified private activities amounted to EUR 184.4 million in 2023, rising from year to year (by 37% more than 5 years earlier). However, this Foundation estimates the request for a much higher sum of... €2.6 to 5.4 billion. The greed of this kind of organization is infinite and can always justify fresh needs. This well has no bottom...
The investigator asks whether greater public subsidies are truly needed for specified purposes? A legislature information study published in 2020 showed that the policy of "against force against women" is mostly financed by local governments, and that "private funds" are already tiny and not specifically acquired. The study besides highlighted the "intransparency" of the award criteria, as well as the administrative confusion resulting from the various forms of funding.
Government multiplies equality plans
The French Court of Auditors (the equivalent of the NIK) has long referred to "responsibility" of expenditure, "accidentity in granting grants" and "total deficiency of control over the effects of subsidised actions and their real impact on women's situation and sex equality". The Department for Women's Rights and Equality does not really know the exact number of grant beneficiaries associations. Even then, the legislature questioned the association's nonsubjective with their funding. The Court of Auditors noted that "often the only reason for granting funds was to item the word "woman" as an effective key to obtaining grants". In 2023, the Court examined the effectiveness of a "public policy for equality between women and men". deficiency of coordination, ambiguity of objectives, insufficient monitoring of actions has been noted. The government has supported specified actions through successive initiatives, which were besides lacking in themselves. These included the "interministerial plan for equality at work" (2016-2020), the "plan to mobilise and combat force against women" (2017-2019), or the "convention on sex equality in the education system" (2019-2024). Large money was spent without virtually no results. For example, the Interministerial Committee on sex Equality (CIEFH) did not even meet, although it should do so at least twice a year.
A fresh inter-ministerial plan for sex equality was late introduced in France between 2023 and 2027. It does not measure the erstwhile ‘plans’ or the evaluation principles. In addition, budget resources for specified programmes are renewed each year practically "from a vending machine". It is no wonder that the investigator summarizes these "progressive" actions of the state on "the fight against force against women" as "great fraud".
Bureaucracy is increasing – feminist organizations are gaining weight
The Court said on this subject that the institutions appointed by the government deal with themselves, multiplying the number of officials and referees in central directorates, regional and departmental services. The work for the money spent is melted and the obligations between associations and administration are not controlled and checked. The state grants for the Equal Opportunities programme amounted to EUR 2.4 billion in 2023. This is an increase of 84% compared to 2022. specified actions advance the phenomenon of organization feminism. A full class of activists specialised in the introduction of "social progress" was created.
Messeant states that “institutional feminism”, which is established in France, but grows roots and in Poland, can be called “political entrepreneurship” behind economist Burton Folsom. However, unlike private entrepreneurs, “political entrepreneurs” live from subsidies and do not gotta worry about marketplace principles, profitability. seeking savings or efficiency of actions. Feminist associations mostly benefit from periodic backing regardless of the results of their work. According to the researcher, specified associations and organisations ceased to act as a ‘vector of real social progress’ but became an almost parasitic element. The French example may be a informing against the actions of our national counterparts, Comrade Kolłontaj... It's worth being smart before the damage...
Bogdan Dobosh
"Hateful comments, lies and half-truths consecutive from the Kremlin". Minister Kotula doesn't head men in women's boxing?