The weekly issue of the Electoral paper on the occasion of an article devoted to Prof. Jan Żaryn besides wrote about people with whom the prof. cooperates.
Among the mentioned persons is me, too. A list of my “sins” are writing to the journals “Think Poland” and “Magna Polonia” and disseminating “Russian narrative”. To “Magna Polonia” I wrote 1 article on the religiousness of General Joseph Haller. A horse with a row to the 1 who sees not so much the Russian narrative, or any mention of Russia at all. Unless, for Wyborcza, writing about General Haller's fervent religion is Russian thinking.
As for “Polish Thoughts”, most of mine afraid historical issues. In 2022, just after the outbreak of military action in Ukraine, I wrote that I am Polish, so I have Polish duties, not German, American or Russian, and I am not going to stick my neck out in the war on which the United States and China will gain the most. "Election" was then selectively quoted by fragments of this message copied from "Polish Thought".
Almost 3 years after that comment, I was only convinced that what I wrote about the background of this conflict was right and that I would not change my head today. I realize that for “Elective” care for your own destiny Homeland, their own nation and putting them higher than caring for the welfare of another nations or states is spreading Russian narrative.
In specified a spirit were my publicist comments printed on “Polish Thoughts”, I criticised, criticized and will criticize the theft of Poles in order to prolong this conflict in the interests of another countries. The harmful abroad policy of COPIS conducted for 17 years is simply a immense drama for our country and the remnants of the conscious consequences of the nation. I have criticized and will criticize the Polish-speaking environments that are facing an armed confrontation between Poland and Russia not in the interests of Russia's fate, but above all Poland and Poles. I propose to take care of Gosiewska or Pawel Kowal, due to the fact that these people spread the communicative to another countries at the expense of Poland. However, it is hard to anticipate pro-Polish reactions from a paper whose editor-in-chief received the first million dollars to launch the title from the US. For 25 years of my socio-political activity, this paper has lied and manipulated information about both me and the environments with which I have collaborated and collaborated. Just as 1 of the protagonists of the movie directed by Barea “the words of fact did not say”, so “Election” the words of fact did not write. This harmful media creation has been affecting Poland and Poles for respective decades.
My cooperation with Prof. Żaryn did not concern his political sympathy towards PiSu, but only to advance the past of Polish national thought. I criticized the attempts of the National thought Heritage Institute directed by him to match national thoughts with Piłsudski and his sidekicks, but mostly the existence of the Institute is very positive. During most likely 5 years of existence, the Institute with a much smaller budget than the IPN and a much smaller staff has done gigantic work to advance the past of the Polish national thought and its merits for the nation and the state. The fact that prof. Żaryn, knowing my differing views on current Polish politics, wanted to cooperate with me in promoting the past of the national movement, only proves it well. We may differ, but there are matters for which it is worth standing above divisions with a good aim in the background.
Arkadius Miksa
