My highly valued origin of information, Thierry Meyssan, published a fresh article on the mediate East. As for this part of the world, Meyssan is beyond any competition! His articles almost always contain a historical background, so you can realize the origin of many events. It besides gives quite a few information that will not be found in mainstream media (it's obvious!!!), but besides in alternate media – due to the fact that it's just well informed! The last article is no different. Feel free to read!!
* * Oh, * *
Start of translation.
What changes in the mediate East?
author: Thierry Meyssan
The first consequence of the Israeli massacres in the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen is not what we expected. Today, criminals in power in Tel Aviv proceed their conquest with the weapons they have received. The transformation began in Israel itself and in the judaic diaspora, forcing the IDF to accept an unwritten ceasefire in Lebanon, while receiving Washington's assistance in moving the battles to Syria. Ukrainian and Lebanese fronts merged and moved to Syria.
Why don't we see the massacres in the mediate East?
In fresh years, the Israeli peace movement has been dismantled, confusion has been introduced between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism and widespread narratives about the collision of civilizations. These 3 mistakes prevent us from seeing and knowing what is happening in the mediate East.
The peace movement of Nahum Goldmann, president of the planet Zionist Organization, no longer exists. Its intent was to make Israel spiritual and moral center of all Jews, a neutral state modeled in Switzerland, with global safety guarantees and permanent symbolic presence on the global stage. Goldmann, who condemned that Adolf Eichmann's trial was held in Jerusalem alternatively than by an global court (which allowed the revisionist Zionists to hide their relation with him), and who negotiated a fair and lasting peaceful coexistence with Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser and with the president of the Palestine Liberation Organization, Jaser Arafat, was even arrested in Israel.
In 1957, historian Bernard Lewis, who was an advisor to Benjamin Netanyahu, erstwhile he was Israel's ambassador to the UN, invented for the U.S. National safety Council, of which he was a member. Civilization Crash Strategy. The thought was to present as inevitable clashes between Western and muslim civilizations, then Chinese and so on. The goal was to justify subsequent Western wars. His assistant, Samuel Huntington, a erstwhile associate of South African apartheid peculiar services, popularized this strategy in 1993, giving it the appearance of an academic report. For this propaganda work, he was paid by the CIA. Although his work is an intellectual mish-mash that cannot withstand analysis, it has penetrated our minds. This stupid explanation is utilized present by Benjamin Netanyahu to justify his wars on the "seven fronts" in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran and Yemen. Yet the same Netanjahu was photographed in September 2014 at the Ziv Medical Center in Zefat erstwhile he visited 500 Al-Qaeda officers treated in Israel [1]. So you can get along with jihadists erstwhile they massacre civilians in Syria, but you can't get along with Palestinians erstwhile they want to make a state.
Natan Szaranski [2], who was Deputy Prime Minister under General Ariel Szaron, came up with the communicative that it was Palestinians as a whole, not any Israeli leaders, refusing peace. He then devised that Iranian revolutionaries wanted to throw all Israeli Jews into the sea (while Jews live peacefully in Iran and are even represented in parliament). Finally, he organised global media campaigns to make confusion between “nationalism”, “Zionism” and “revisionist Zionism”, and then to align “anti-Semitism” with “anti-Zionism” (in which case the Israeli paper Haaretz would be anti-Semitic).
In 2004, Szaranski and Ron Dermer wrote a bilingual book "The origin of Democracy" to assure us that Israel is the only democracy in the mediate East. Dermer became Israel's Ambassador to the United States (2013-2021) and then Minister of strategical Affairs (2023 to this day), in which he organizes the fight against the BDS movement (Boycott, Diverstment, Sanctions) (Boikot, Disposal, Sanctions) worldwide.
Natan Szaranski continues his work discreetly today, both in the United States and in his native Ukraine, through the Institute for investigation on planet Anti-Semitism and Politics (ISGASP). This American association is mostly funded by Ron Dermer's ministry. For example, it organised hearings in legislature of chiefs of major universities to force them to suppress due to anti-Semitism demonstrations against massacres in Gaza.
It is clear that Bernard Lewis, Samuel Huntington, Natan Szaranski and Ron Dermer are not “Zionists”, but “revisionist Zionists”.
Rehanding cards in the mediate East
In this atmosphere of widespread lies, the overall position of all community in the mediate East is changing. This is the consequence of Benjamin Netanyahu's effort to conquer the northern Gaza Strip and confederate Lebanon. Gradually, all political players, including Israeli Jews, realized that Israeli military operations had nothing to do with declared targets: the release of Hamas hostages and the return of Israelis from the north of the country to their homes. The Netanjahu Coalition implements the colonial task of Vladimir Żabatoński (1880-1940): the creation of an empire in Levant, from Nile to Euphrates.
This task has nothing to do with the ancient Kingdom of Jerusalem, which included only the Holy City and its immediate suburbs, but aims to reconstruct the ancient Assyrian Empire in the same way as the protector of Żabatoński, Benito Mussolini, wanted to reconstruct the ancient Roman Empire.
The consequence to the challenge of the fresh fascist conquest wave in Levant was the words of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad at the joint summit of the arabian League and the Organisation of muslim Cooperation in Riyadh on 11 November and Amos Schocken, editor of the Israeli paper Haaretz, at the Israel After October 7th conference: Allied or Alone? in London on 27 November.
All heroes agree on this, even if most avoid referring to the links between Żabatoński and his students and fascists and Nazis. However, Westerners inactive refuse to open their eyes and treat this conflict as if it were not political, but ethnic, as if it had put Jews against the Arabs and even Jews against [all] Arabs.
Three elements play a peculiar function in the ongoing changes:
– Jackson triumph of Donald Trump in the United States over the Strauss coalition of Kamala Harris. The erstwhile intends to replace military wars with commercial wars, while the second seeks to lead to Armageddon.
– Israel's defence Forces (IDFs), which have unquestionable control of the airspace of their neighbours, are incapable of any triumph on land. They have no discipline, and many of their soldiers act like bandits. After the Straussian defeat in the United States, they no longer have many weapons and most likely their supplies have run out. Finally, respective individuals, witnessing the crimes of others, are now on the verge of rebellion.
– The judaic diaspora, which has so far supported Benjamin Netanjah without hesitation, is yet able to separate its support for Israeli Jews from the crimes of their government. Since Netanjah's indictment on 21 November by the global Criminal Court, solidarity between the Jews, which was built for centuries of persecution by the Goys, has been no longer in force. Many judaic figures, so far silent, publically distanced themselves from crimes committed on the “seven fronts” and against the UN.
Iran has abandoned General Qassem Soleimani's "oppositions of resistance" strategy, according to which Tehran helps and coordinates all independent armed groups fighting the colonization of the region. He refused to assist Lebanon during the Israeli invasion, and then the ruling faction sent Israel the data of the chief military leaders of Hezbollah to be murdered.
At the same time, Tehran and Tel Aviv staged their antagonism, claiming they were ready for a decisive battle. However, the 2 Iranian attacks (Operation "The Honest Promise" of April 13 and October 1) and the 2 Israeli attacks (of April 19 and October 26) did not origin almost no casualties in humans, despite the fact that the armed forces of both sides utilized an chance to test the defence of the opponent [3]. The secret agreement between Washington, Tehran and Tel Aviv became obvious.
Tehran besides renewed his ties with the Iraqi Kurds. president Masoud Pezeshkian went to Iraq in September to meet not only the Talabani tribe, but besides (pro-Israeli) Barzans.
In Iraq, Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, spiritual leader of the Shiite community, spoke to convey a vague message showing that he no longer knows what he might anticipate from the muslim Republic.
In Yemen, Ansar Allah, a certain Iranian return, took steps to defend his leader, Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, from the destiny he encountered Hassan Nasrallah.
In Turkey, as usual, president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan explores the various possibilities that stand in front of him without engaging either here or there. slow approaching his Syrian counterpart, he allowed arms to be delivered to jihadists in Idleb so that they could resume their fight with the Syrian arabian Republic. At the same time, he sent emissaries to talk with Abdullah Öcalan, the founder of PKK, who has been imprisoned since 1978. Regardless of the course of the talks, it is improbable that the "Apo" will support NATO and Israel, as its movement is presently doing.
Iran's retreat and Turkey's double fraud abruptly put an end to the euphoria of the BRICS Summit in Kazan a period ago [4].
In Syria, president Bashar al-Assad immediately supported the Lebanese and his allies from Hezbollah erstwhile they were abandoned by Iran. Historically, Lebanon is only 1 of Syria's provinces, and from this point of view Syria is liable for the safety of the Lebanese. She so granted asylum to hundreds of thousands of refugees fleeing Israeli bombings and handed over to Hezbollah the fewer weapons she had.
In response, the IDF destroyed all roads and bridges providing access to Lebanon, and then, along with NATO, released jihadists from Idleb to Aleppo, capturing and occupying a large condition of it. The city was defended by Iranian Revolutionary Guards who withdrew without a fight.
To the surprise of all, jihadists in Idleb have the latest weapons, funded by Qatar and a multitude of drones operated by Ukrainian operators.
The Unchanging behaviour of Revisionist Zionists
One of the constants in the preservation of revisionist Zionists is the demolition of material evidence of their lies. For example, Benjamin Netanjahu changed the hours of his meetings on October 7, 2023. He hoped it would make it easier for him to deny that he had helped carry out an attack on his own people.
Israelis know that he helped Hamas from the minute he was appointed Prime Minister in 2009 to 7 October. He claimed his strategy was to favour Hamas in the fight against OWP Jaser Arafat. His first authoritative decision was to cancel the extradition request for Moussa Abou Marzouka, the highest ranking Hamas leader at the time, who was held in the United States. another events showed that its aim was not to destruct the OWP, but to prevent the creation of a Palestinian state. In 2018, erstwhile the Palestinian Authority stopped paying civilian servants in the Gaza Strip, it concluded an agreement with Yahya Sinwar, Hamas' military leader in the Gaza Strip who was imprisoned in Israel at the time. He first donated the money secretly and then officially via Qatar. In 4 years, he paid Hamas $2.5 billion to build a network of tunnels and arm himself.
In this way Netanjahu and Hamas received support from the Anglo-Saxon peculiar Services, the faithful strategy set out in 1916 by Lord Herbert Samuel, whose boy Edwin was a companion of Żabatoński: to guarantee that neither the judaic state nor the future Palestinian State would never be able to warrant their own safety.
Another constant in the preservation of revisionist Zionists is the demolition of archaeological evidence of their frauds. In 2009, Netanyahu's second decision as Prime Minister was to dig tunnels under the Temple Hill to blow up the Al-Aks mosque. In fresh months, he destroyed all archaeological remains in confederate Lebanon, both Crusaders and Osmans, and even attempted to destruct the Baalbeck temples, the largest sanctuary of the Roman Empire. Thus he continued to destruct Babylon during the Gulf War and the remnants of Aleppo and Palmyra during the Syrian War. Anything should be done to guarantee that claims to land from the Nile to the Euphrates are seen as legitimate.
[1] “More than 500 jihadists cared for at the Ziva Medical Centre”, Translation Pete Kimberley, Voltaire Network, 24 November 2015.
[2] “Natan Sharansky, the ideologicalist of forced democracy”, by Voltaire Network, Voltaire Network, 6 June 2005.
[3] “Israeli-Iranian auctions mask the reorganisation of allies in the mediate East”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Roger Lagassé, Voltaire Network, 5 November 2024.
[4] “In Kazan, the order of the planet was turned upside down“, by Thierry Meyssan Voltaire Network, 29 October 2024.
End of translation.
* * Oh, * *
Everything indicates that Israel is waiting for Trump to rule. Iran won't do anything for now either. But the conflict escalates in Ukraine and the war in Syria has been rekindled. It paid off due to the fact that it active Russia in defending a Syrian ally.
After Russia utilized the Oriesznik rocket, the Western approach to the conflict in Ukraine changed. The attacks with ATACMS and Storm Shadow rockets ended. Apparently, the fresh Russian weapon was impressive! The Western strategy so far was to bring Russia to a situation where it had to usage atomic weapons. This would make Russia a pariah internationally and would make sanctions effective. Now Russia doesn't request a atomic bomb. The same objectives can be achieved with the aid of Oriesznik without being exposed to global ostracism. But suddenly, 1 by one, there were "peaceful" proposals from the West. I think it has 2 objectives: firstly, it seeks to divide the Russian society and secondly to show Western societies the "bloodlust" of Putin and Russia. The Russians are to hear: look, we offer you peace, but your government does not want it, and you must proceed to die in this war. The message to Western societies is: we want peace, we propose that occupied areas be considered Russian, but Russia does not want peace. As far as Russian society is concerned, this Western message will not scope him. Russia does not care about territorial conquests (which almost nobody in Poland understands and refuses to accept). Russia's goal is to defend the country! The Russians will not let their government to have any " rotten" peace. They no longer believe in any Western “guarantees”. The request for the Ukrainian state to be liquidated is increasing, as this is the only warrant that Ukraine will not join NATO and no American rockets will be deployed on its territory. It is much more likely that these fairy tales will believe Western societies, which do not realize the real reasons for Russian intervention in Ukraine.
The West increasingly sees that this war is getting out of control, that sanctions on Russia are counterproductive, and, to the detriment of it, an expanding number of countries, feeling behind the back of a Chinese dragon and a Russian bear, no longer fear, unites and demands release from neocolonial dependence on the West. Therefore, I have repeatedly mentioned that military confrontation is inevitable. The West will either win it or fall economically and civilizationally! But the chances of winning this war are besides slim. I have besides mentioned many times that I fear any unthinkable steps of the West – acts of despair and desperation. It turns out that these are not just my fears! Not just anyone, either, due to the fact that John Mearsheimer himself has akin fears! In a conversation with justice Napolitano, he said:
"Remember that NATO is losing this war, the United States is losing this war. It'll be a devastating defeat and we're desperate. We're clearly desperate, and at this point, let's ask ourselves: what can the desperate West and the desperate United States do? And Putin understands that the United States can take measures that truly escalate the situation in a way that is not beneficial for either Russia or the United States and I think he has a vital interest in preventing us from moving besides far up the escalation ladder, but at the same time proceed to dominate the battlefield.”
Is this gonna work? For both parties this is simply a ‘to be or not to be’ situation. For both sides, this is an existential threat. So far, I don't see a way out that's acceptable to both sides. But I'm not losing hope of being found.
The article comes from a blog Pecunia olet
