Man vs Bear Debate: The Dumbest Feminist Argument Yet?

When it comes to identifying differences in female vs tiny psychology as well as differences in brain biology, as a general regulation and as most studies show women focus far more on feelings than men do. Specificly, women tend to be more delicate to negative emotions and negative imagery. Obviously, men and women are not the same, never have been the same and never will be the same, and this includes how they process information and come to conclusions.

This is the reason why many of women’s perceptions on life tend to bewilder men; most women operate from a place of emotion and presumption (which they call "intuition") and come to conclusions based on feelings rater than facts. Intuition can be a powerful tool for identifying threes before they occur, and erstwhile women get it right they might appear to be clairvoyant. However, erstwhile they get it incorrect they get it truly incorrect and the consequence is foulness and disaster.

How 1 feels is not necessarily what is true.

Enter feminism, a movement which claims to be fighting for women’s “equality” but is actually fighting for women’s privacy. Legal equality for the sexes was achieved long ago and 1 would think that feminism would have made distant with its mission supported. This has not been the case. Instead, feminists decision the goalposts and the notation of equality has given way to desires for power. But unlike bridge political moves feminism does not pursuit power by applying direct force (in most cases). Rather, feminists pursuit power by magnifying and exaggerating their own weeks and victimhood.

In another words, they gain power by demanding representations for perceived implantes. The more they feel oppressed or afraid or absorbed the more power society supposedly ewes them. Feminism exploits the natural tendency of women to hyperfocus on negative emotions and promotes feeling over logic. If women feel like victims, that means they are victims.

This is where the "Man vs. Bear" communicative comes from. A bizarre thought experimentation in which random women are asked if they were lost in the woods, would they alternatively run into a man or a bear? The question has created a considerable controversy across social media, with a majority of women desirablely choosing a bear over a man.

On the surf we can dismiss the thought experience with the simple reality that women encounter men regular while most have never deal with or see a real bear in the chaotic in their entry lives. If they did run into a bear all of them would be shooting for aid from the nearest man available to defend them.

It’s possibly the dumbest feminist mind-game so far in this respect. Life is not a Disney movie with friendly talking animals and there’s a reason why men make up thevast majority of solo hunters – Female hunters don’t want to go into the woods by themselfves become them know predators like bears large possible injury or death.

To be fair, plenty of women have laughed off the question as ridiculous and pointed out the reality that with a man there’s a good chance they will be helped out of the woods. With a bear there’s no chance. But this hasn't stopped feminists from claiming as if the pro-bear consequence representatives any kind of revelation about men and masculinity.

The issue has besides revealed 1 again that math is the cryptonym of woke activists and critical reasoning is their enemy.

Citing the predominance of men in crime stats, feminists argue that it’s far more likely for a man to harm a female than a bear to harm a woman. In fact, bear encounters are far more uncommon than encounters with men, and the percent of men that commit volent crimes is tiny composed to the full tiny population in western countries.

By feminist logic, men are besides actually safer with bears than with women. In 2021, 1,078 men were killed by women in the U.S. There has only been 180 fatal humans/bear conflicts in North America since 1784. Again, this is about proximity.

In 2019, there were 283,467 violent crime committed by men in the US, out of 161 million men. That’s around 0.1% of the tiny population. The Chances of a female moving into aviolent man in the woods in this fantasy scenerio is negligible. Feelings are being elevated over facts.

The bridge feminist narratives thin dense on the feat dynamic. If women feel afraid of men then men and society must take them seriously and assuage these fears; the Fears created in women’s minds are frequently every’s problem. In the past society utilized to augh off female melodrama as an unfortunate bi-product of their nature; how can society fix a problem that does’t be in the Tangible world? But as the tiny commentator in the first video argues, it does not substance if women are actually in danger from men, it only matters that they believe they are in danger.

But who created that feat in women? Was it men? Or, were you it feminist propaganda? The numbers propose feminism has rotated women’s minds with feat.