Makow-" How did I find my male identity"

grazynarebeca5.blogspot.com 1 month ago


"Helps to view heterosexual love as a mystical dance. Male leads; Female follows him.

Humanity suffers from a phenomenon I call "transfer". This happens erstwhile we search our ideal, seeking perfection in individual else ("love") alternatively of in ourselves. It'll castrate men. We just gotta respond to the spark of God in our soul.

Our natural state is bliss. The reason why we are so anxious and unhappy is that we are trying to regain this bliss from society (sex, "love", status, money, power, etc.), not from our own connection of the soul to God. The kingdom of heaven is inside!


Another example of the transfer is the situation in which we blame God for our own failures. God is relying on us to fulfill His Plan.


Heterosexuality is not based on equality. It's based on uneven power.

Manhood is defined by Power. Femininity is defined by Love. Men want power. Women want love. Heterosexual matrimony is an exchange – a woman's strength for the male strength expressed in love. A female shows her love, entrusting her power to a man who gained her trust through courtship. It's feminine.

When men surrender, they are castrated. This article, My firston the net 23 years ago, describes how I learned to follow My male instincts.

A man is dominant in a heterosexual relationship.

Cabalists (Satanists)castrated both sexes, teaching women

To search power alternatively of love. They manipulate fundamental laws universe (yin active-yang passive).

Men are programmed to love and defend women. Feminism He stripped women of the top treasure that life has to offer.

Updated from 2003 and 2024.

Written by Dr. Henryk Makow

When I was 21And I lived in Israel, and I got a letter from my mother. She took my savings and invested in a tenement.

– And now you are male – she said.

I wondered what she meant. How did having a home make me a man?

I grew up in a time erstwhile the youth "searched for identity". I looked for him in Israel. I later became a Canadian nationalist. In each of these cases, I did not find an identity in the word "sociality".

I had a strong, patriarchal father who was a perfect function model. He built a successful career and maintained a family.

"Find the occupation you like," he said. "Work is the backbone of a man. It's the most crucial decision a man makes. Wife's second."

But for any reason his example was not accepted. Why not?

For centuries men have defined themselves in terms of manhood. Why didn't I know that?

I modeled myself on the media. I was a feminist.

FLOOR AND household ATTACH

I was raised in an era in which a feminist lie was put in place – men and women are identical. In our culture, women are encouraged to be "equal" – doing everything men do and vice versa. "Equal" became "identical". It delayed my individual improvement by 25 years. I uncertainty if I'm alone.

"Identical" made me look for myself in a partner. I was virtually attracted to soft young women with cut boy hair: my own personality.

I put a female on a pedestal due to the fact that she had the key to my identity. She could give it to me. any women were immediately repulsed. Others enjoyed this worship for a while, but yet lost respect.

What I needed was individual completely different from me, my feminine complement.

In the end, feminism will be recognized for what it is: virulently antisocial, anti-female, lesbian ideology that gained power, pretending to be a advocate of "women's rights". By taking power, feminism was able to castrate men and masculinize women. In another words, women usurped their male identity, and in this process both sexes lost their own.

Unbelievable, but destroying heterosexuality is simply a hidden feminist plan that believes that sex difference is the origin of all injustice.

Most people do not realize that the feminist movement virtually has communist roots. Most leading feminist thinkers, including Betty Friedan and Simone de Beauvoir, were Marxists, and many of them were besides lesbians.

Feminism is about power, not choice. "No female should be authorized to stay home and rise children," said feminist founder Simone de Beauvoir. "Women should not have specified a choice, due to the fact that if there is specified a choice, besides many women will take it" (Saturday Review, June 14, 1975).

If feminism truly was about making choices, it would not indoctrinate women to enter the labour marketplace and become "independent". She wouldn't demonize men and heterosexual love. She wouldn't quit on feminists getting married and starting families.

Lesbians have always been women who coveted the male role. It is based on Marxist concepts of "equality" and class conflict that have no connection to mystical and biological reality specified as love.

The breakdown of conventional household caused by feminism is the main origin of our social, individual and existential problems. People have always gained meaning and intent from household roles (e.g. daughter, wife and mother) and from life cycle rituals (marriage, birth and death). Indeed, matrimony and household are God’s way of achieving love and individual fulfillment.

We find not the fullness by integrating manhood and femininity into ourselves, but by uniting ourselves with our opposite. Heterosexual love is attracting opposites. Indeed, as heterosexuals, we specify ourselves in terms of these differences. If we are a man, we are not a female and vice versa, like darkness and light. due to the fact that I denied those differences, I didn't know who I was. I didn't realize women and I didn't know how to approach them.


RECOVERY OF MANY

I was almost 50 years old before I solved the mystery. Book The Flight from female (1964) Karl Stern, a Canadian psychiatrist, confirmed what my instincts told me. My parent was right all along. A man builds a house; a female creates a house.

According to Stern, manhood is defined by "power" over the natural and social environment. Men form a physical and cultural context for the home world. They are men of deed: adventurers and builders, defenders and deliverers.

Femininity is defined by "love". Female psychology is based on raising and loving husbands and children and thus on being needed and loved. Women are the engines of love, acting like the heart in the body. The household is the primary building block of society and the foundry of the future. Women are her foundation.

People specify themselves through actions; Women are simply love: beauty, charm, religion and goodness. Men tend to be rational and objective; Women subjective, intuitive and emotional. specified distinctions request not limit us. They are a subject on which we can play our own variations. For example, my wife mows the lawn; I do all the buying and cooking. But without a subject, there's confusion and chaos.

The feminist gospel that conventional sex roles are "prepressive" is wrong. For many, a flexible explanation of conventional roles is essential to happiness and fulfillment.

I learned from Karl Stern's distinctions. If a man is motivated by power and a female by love, Heterosexual love must be the exchange of these two.

A female surrenders her power in confidence. That's how a female expresses her love. Trusting. This is how women actually strengthen men. If a man betrays that trust, he loses his power.

In exchange for his power, a female gets what she truly wants: the strength of a man expressed in his intense, indivisible love.

It involves it in the sphere of its own interest: this is how 2 people become one. Her happiness is his happiness. He can't hurt her without hurting himself.

RETURNING THE WOMAN

Teaching women to search male strength prevents them from getting what they truly want. Women want to be possessed by a man's love.

God’s love for creation is reflected in man’s love for woman. A man directs God’s love for a woman, making her his wife and mother. Women want male strength, but it should be in a man.

A girl erstwhile told me, "I want to be abused." The same girl besides said that without a man she feels "like a boat without a rudder." Similarly, a man without a female is simply a rudder without a boat.

A man cannot love a female who competes with him for power. Relationships between alleged "equals" are like mergers or roommates.


Psychiatrist, Irene Claremont de Castillejo, calls them "brother-sister marriages" (Knowing Women: A Feminine Psychology, 1973).

They cannot accomplish intimacy, as erstwhile a female submits her will to a man, and the man reciprocates this trust with his sincere love. any psychiatrists sayThat the sexual satisfaction of a female is besides related to her ability to trust and surrender.

Heterosexuality is not based on equality. Women strengthen men by submitting to them in exchange for love.

Femininity is based on giving power to love. erstwhile men do it, they're castrated.

Women are God's creatures. Lovers sacrifice their same for love, which in many religions is the key to transcendence. Helen Deutsch drew attention to this "masochistic-Narcisian" syndrome in her book The Psychology of Women: A Psychoanalytic Interpretation (1944). Most women only come actual as wives and mothers. They know that in their hearts.

Women besides cannot love the men they compete with. Women are hypergamous, which means they're looking for men with a higher position than they are. Even the most avid heterosexual feminist can love individual more powerful than herself.

Fighting for power poisons male-female relationships. This is the death of love. Men cannot quit their defining trait (powers) and anticipate them to be men. Women cannot criticize and challenge men and anticipate them to be loved.

When I realized it, I felt liberated. I had a healthy relation with a female who is my female complement and I married her.


CONCLUSION

A common charge is that men do not know how to be men; Women don't know how to be women. It helps to see heterosexual love as a mystical dance. Male leads; Female follows him. You can't have a graceful dance if each partner doesn't play his part.

Dance is based on love. The male always takes into account the wishes of his partner due to the fact that he loves her. In any cases he will ask her to lead.

She doesn't want to strangle her or frustrate her. He wants her to grow due to the fact that he's part of it.

Like in social dancing, who can say which function is more important? Both partners have the same value. Dancing requires both leadership and the dynamics of a man; and beauty, love and charm of a woman.

In the dance of love, 2 people become one, and the fruit of this mystical union is frequently a child.

----------

Related to- 50 actual differences between men and women

Zahra's first comment:

I'm a young 15-year-old girl. from England, and I'm very glad I came across your website. This is simply a very informative reading. I peculiarly like your articles on feminism. What I like about your site compared to another sites is that you do not demonize women or reduce them to sex and beauty, as others do. I feel... Safe reading your things. You truly should sale your ideas to schools (if you are not arrested!). I feel torn; I want to survey medicine erstwhile I'm older and find a cure for diseases, but I besides want to have children 1 day. matrimony will not be specified a large problem, due to the fact that an arranged matrimony would have taken place at about 20 years of age. I'm an immigrant in the second generation whose parents spent their young years in Britain, so you'd think at least they realize the cultural collision I'm going through. They don't, but whatever. I was wondering what you could do in my situation.

Zahra said:

Do you have the option of having a household first and then training? If so, this is the way I recommend.

Henr


Translated by Google Translator

source:henrymakow.com

Read Entire Article