After respective times insurgence (Kaczyński, Morawiecki, Pogonowski) it would seem that the sejna specialist of the jachka, besides known as the commission of Magdalena Sroka, had reached the bottom. Unfortunately. It turned out that it was only a temporary halt on the way to further decline.
Pof the alleged meeting The Commission of enquiry to examine the legality, regularity and appropriateness of the operational and investigative activities undertaken, inter alia, utilizing Pegasus software by members of the Council of Ministers, peculiar services, police, taxation and customs and taxation control authorities, authorities designated for the prosecution of criminal offences and prosecutions during the period from 16 November 2015 to 20 November 2023. it will go back to past as an example of the top self-orphaning of the ruling coalition MPs so far after 1989.
Let's remember. The Commission meeting, beginning at 10.30 p.m., was to be held by the Police, Zbigniew Ziobro, acting as a witness.
The police captured the minister of justice at 10.30 p.m., after which within a fewer minutes she delivered him to the Sejm (10.14). But 2 minutes later, the alleged committee of Magdalena Magroki ended the gathering earlier by adopting the arrest of b. Minister of Justice for 30 days.
PArticle 287(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure constitutes the legal interruption for specified an application.
§ 2. In case of persistent evasion of testimony, the performance of an expert, translator or specialist and the issue of the subject may be applied, irrespective of the penalty, to arrest for a period not exceeding 30 days. That provision shall apply mutatis mutandis in the event of persistent non-vocation at the request of the investigating authority, if the order for detention and enforcement referred to in Article 285(2) is not adequate to guarantee the presence of the requested person.
Let us skip the criticism of this provision. It's besides much of a subject to decision around here. But let us look at the wording of the recipe. In order to be able to apply a temporary arrest to a witness, his Persistence of evasion from giving a statement.
This concept assumes multiple refusals to execute procedural duties, which is possible with respect to a fragment of the event which is the subject of this evidence (cf. P. Hofmanski, KPK). Commentary, pp. 1, 2007, p. 1274). It is assumed that the anticipation of arrest shall enter into account no sooner than twice the refusal to execute a procedural work on the individual concerned (see R. Górecki, Admissibility to apply penalties, p. 128; E. Strzebowicz, in: R. Kmiecik, E. Strzebowicz, Criminal Process, 2002, p. 337; P. Hofmanski, KPK. Commentary, pp. 1, 2007, p. 1274).
But... the charge of specified a Ziobrze is impossible. First of all, it should be noted that the completion of the Magpie Commission's work on Friday was premature.
The committee did not receive any information from the Police that it is impossible to carry out this!
Furthermore, Zbigniew Ziobry's arrest occurred precisely at the time of the start of the gathering of this henchman and so the cognition of police acceptance of the witness was available. I remind you that it is without any meaning whether anyone from the "commission" actually had specified knowledge, due to the fact that he could easy learn about the real state not only by watching the "Republic", but by calling the appropriate rank of police officer.
But it turns out that the members of the Magpie Commission knew about the arrest of Zbigniew Ziobra!
One of the members of the Magpie neocommission, MP Przemysław Wipler, said:
The members of the Pegasus committee were rushing, saying, "Hurry up, he's about to get in here," they did not let MP Fwik to vote to velocity up the motion for arrest against Zbigniew Ziobry and not question him. This shows that the committee was set for a performance, and it was more valuable for its members to vote on an arrest request than a witness hearing. This will be hard for Poles to explain.
]]>https://news.onet.pl/only-in-onet/chaos-in-case-meeting-ko...]]>
Przemysław Wipler is simply a Confederate, so he is not necessarily objective, at least according to the most deluded people who have hated the United Right in a decade.
But Marek Siwicki, talker of the elder talker of the Polish Sejm, MP of the PSL, says the same!
...The committee had contact with the police and knew that a politician was on his way with them this morning.. I don't know what kind of problem it is to wait 15 minutes. It has frequently happened at various committee meetings that the Secretary of State or another authorised persons could not come, which made the gathering late by an hr or two. At the time, we managed a break, talked to the committee bureau, listened to experts, agreed on a further strategy and returned with the concept. It should be this time anyway. Ziobro would sit in the hallway for 2 hours and nothing would happen.
(WPROST)
A On Thursday, the “reliable” information about the Magpie b. Minister fleeing the committee was distributed.
Ba, the eight-star MP Witold Zembaczyński, commonly referred to as the "necessary", publically boasted that the neocommission of Magpie was prepared for any eventuality.
Meanwhile, the events of January 31 led to a committee with a very long name becoming... A drinking committee!
But no more jokes. The Magpie Commission has breached the law in a material way. First of all, knowing that the witness Zbigniew Ziobro is detained and is presently on his way to the Sejm has taken action to... prevent his interrogation.
Meanwhile, the dog's work of Srók, pancakes and another Kluzki-Rostkowskis was to order a short break and to join the activities for which we taxpayers pay them well.
The decision to arrest Ziobra in this situation is unjustified and so active in the criminal offence referred to in Article 231(2) of the Criminal Code:
§ 1. A public authoritative who, in excess of his or her powers or failing to fulfil his or her duties, acts in the public or private interest shall be liable to imprisonment up to 3 years.
§ 2. If the offender commits the act referred to in § 1 in order to get a property benefit or individual benefit, he shall be sentenced to imprisonment from 1 year to 10 years.
Remember, the benefit may be for individual else. It is hard to imagine the consequences for the political parties of the United Right erstwhile Polish-language media will be constantly processing the fact of arresting 1 of the leaders of the United Right.
The Neocommission of Magpie is simply a specified propaganda tool of Tusk, and he's not even hiding.
All the more reason for the allegation in the above article.
And let's not wonder if the Bodnar D.A. will take any action on the case.
Let's call it a crime.
For as the Ancients utilized to say a drop digs a rock.
He'll yet move...
1.02 2025
