Another article from the ,,national treachery’ cycle. I just wonder if public and unforced writing about cooperation with the enemy, about collaboration and collaborators, about sacrificing sovereignty for the greater but distant good, is simply a title to glory or to... a noose. Would I not sometimes share the destiny lost during the Kosciuszko Uprising, erstwhile the revolutionary boiling of Poland will take over in any time? And the situation is akin to that of the late 18th century. Oh, like...
The title of this article is not a provocation. It is simply a look at the position of a political realist who realizes that our past has been marked in fresh centuries with blood due to historical events, of which we seldom draw the right conclusions. We then divide into at least three, "triples": supporters of subservience, whether or not they hold the door handles in Brussels, Moscow, Washington or Berlin, supporters of full independency and sovereignty and... The alleged swamp means those who don't care. However, the second like ,,subsidiaries”, due to the fact that they require less, they do not impose with any Polish, any patriotism. Here, hot water in the tap (Berlin?), sausage and grill. These others, on the another hand (full sovereignty and independence), are sometimes ready to die for this independency and, on the another hand, prepare a akin destiny for Poles. Sometimes, due to the fact that if they decently realize the national interest, they avoid like fire any political decision that is at large risk. Sovereignty and independency are viewed as an objective, distant but real, and in this direction are their political actions (Dmowski).
All right, but what about this sovereign trade? I personally believe that the worst situation for the nation is the state in which the state practically does not have its own industry, the debt of ,,, global bankers” reaches hundreds of billions of dollars, there is lawlessness and omnipotence of the state, patriotism and Polishness are values widely despised, and young Poles are imposed on anticulture (LGBT, atheism, multiculti, etc). It will take respective decades and many generations of Poles to work for nothing. Then you request a decision that's unpopular, which gives distant part of the good that we have as a nation to gain more.
This unusual thought came to head in connection with Trump's earlier negotiations with Zelenski. The demands of the Americans towards Ukraine did not surprise me at all, but on the contrary, confirmed to me that sovereignty (and does Ukraine have it?) is for sale. Apart from all the facts related to the U.S.-Ukrainian negotiations, which I do not know in item – like the readers of the Conservatives portal Conservatives.pl – I think that in this disastrous situation in which Ukraine is located, the trampoline for rebuilding the state could be a task of donating any of the mineral wealth and large areas of black earth (obviously maximising the national interest of Ukraine), in exchange for any immense investment and preservation of the national substance. due to the fact that what does Ukraine have today? A large part of the country destroyed, the deaths of hundreds of thousands of citizens, multi-million-dollar emigration, low GDP per capita, influences of globalists wishing to make the Ukrainians a "rooted" society. If Zelenski were reasoning about Ukraine's national interest and not thinking, due to the fact that behind his back are various dark forces of Mordor, he would negociate with Russia and make a deal with the Americans, beneficial to both parties. It is clear that Ukraine would not be a sovereign country (and it is not). It would be subject openly and consciously to 2 powers: Russia and the United States. After 20 or 30 years, we would have a strong and well-organised state in the east. And then, in the right global configuration, 1 could act towards sovereignty and independence. (Another thing is that specified a possible would not be very good for us, but in this article I deliberately overlook our point of view.)
I personally believe that the sovereignty of the state is not a value that is higher than the national interest, due to the fact that the second is simply a position of hundreds of years, alternatively than a waste of respective decades of history. We all know what Poland should look like in an perfect state. It's easy to game the perfect we dream of. However, giving to our «elites» – and I mean these present post-solidarities – full sovereignty will not bring anything good, due to the fact that if they do not turn Poland back into individual else's hands, they will most likely spread out on our assets (increased taxes, «sick» law, social engineering), acting only in their own interests. That is why I like to live in a non-divide country, with a fresh patriotic elite, which, of course, has a goal of sovereignty, but this goal is implemented in accordance with a good plan, consistent with the national interest. It's kind of like China's strategy. As we know, this country takes its time, slow builds its power, gains the advantage and knows that time works in their favor. The mediate State is simply a state-civilization with respective 1000 years of history. Poland, as we know, is over a 1000 years of history, that is, we have something to build on and we can calmly conduct a long-term and reasonable policy. If Poland had remained under the influence of the USSR after 1989, and then Russia, economically opened up to the planet but with its own economical interests in mind, if it had retained what was good in education and at the same time preserved a «good» demography, a balanced budget, and not a sovereign country, would specified a situation be compatible with the national interest or not? I think it definitely is, due to the fact that sovereignty is simply a immense value, but only erstwhile it is practiced by morally healthy elites.
In this article, I deliberately omitted the real reasons for the Russian-Ukrainian war and the function of Zelenski. I compose this so I don't get accused of being naive. I would like to draw attention to the fact that sometimes a voluntary and conscious failure of sovereignty is simply a better solution than a cramped adherence to sovereignty. If an independent and sovereign country gets into the hands of alien civilizations and national elites, it brings more evil than good and better then for a time own national interest ,,save” under a abroad umbrella.
Jarosław Luma
