The advantage of surviving in the state is not to participate in right-wing large city disputes. I find out practically all day that there is simply a gathering with an active anti-system policy or with a publicist who has any influence on a widely understood public forum. On the 1 hand, a individual would like to participate in specified a meeting, to feel the atmosphere of serious discussions and sometimes ask a question. But on the another hand, it is much more convenient to turn on your telephone or laptop and, with any light homework, focus on what our right is trying to convey.
Recently, I perceive a lot to youtube and banbye interesting lectures or messages that are not present in mainstream media, which perfectly show 1 clear dominant trend. Well, there are quite a few Talmudic debates, where disputes are practically created at a speed, where many people share already divided environments.
The thought for this article appeared actually recently, i.e. on 1 of the March cold Thursdays, erstwhile I was busy with my homework, commissioned by my wife. I included the interview of Mr. Monika Jaruzelska (I like the interviews of Mr. Jaruzelska due to the form, the anticipation of ,,speaking out” of guests, the deficiency of malice and the fact that someway the mentioned woman is avoided by politicians of Writing, PO or Left, which I am glad about) with the Confederate MP Mr. Dobromir Sosnier. I listened for a while and stated that this is another voice of the right-wing man who does not truly know why there was a dispute with Mr. S. Mentzen's fresh Hope and a group called Freedomists. Yes, there was a translation that these are more ambitious disputes that occurred in the primary to , , , , , ,, while others do not know why they started to promote. At the time I was reminded of interviews with Mr Mentzen, Mr Dziambor, Mr Winnicki, not necessarily with Mr Jaruzelska but, for example, on tv inRealu24. Actually a akin approach: seeking differences, emphasizing their rations, and acting more like the leaders of the winning organization that just won the election.
I came up with specified a summary on this cold March day: you're all right, no substance what you say, whether you are active Confederate politicians or just right-wing “youtubers” (I don't like the word). Your disputes are of no importance to me, and they can only benefit the presently ruling post-solidarity ,,elita”. It reminds me of specified a well-known joke: "Two quarreled Jews went to a wise rabbi to decide which of them was right..." And erstwhile I hear Mr Sosnier emerge, I find that he is right. Mr JKM, Mr Braun (although he is most likely the only MP who avoids emphasizing differences within the Confederation), Mr Winnicki, Mr Mentzen, Mr Sykulski, etc. What if it was red? T. Sommer (now.com) asked amazed (although I don't think he had the chance to do so):
"But Rabbi, you tell the first that he's right and the second that he's right.
That's impossible! erstwhile the rabbi heard the student, he thought and said:
– You know, you're right too.”
You're all right. We're out of time. I prophesy that our society must be brought to average and it will take at least 20 years. Socialism and influences of another civilizations have done considerable damage. Unfortunately, it takes 10 more years to settle Talmudic disputes in the right-wing world.
I'm not writing it out of intellectual laziness. On the contrary, I see the difference between the groups forming the Confederation, I analyse all these views, and I simply conclude that specified a Confederation, as a broad anti-system front, as different modes and cogs of the same machinery, is what we Poles should be looking for.
This does not mean, of course, that I accept any "anti-systemist"—a man who scorns against the present power and as any indeterminate freedom (P. Tanajno) and admit him as an ally. The basic condition is to mention to Latin civilization, and it includes a national state, a free marketplace (within the state), Catholic ethics, limited bureaucracy and the law, regulating many of my spheres of life, than is presently the case, etc.
And another argument against Talmudic disputes. any groundbreaking events are crucial in politics, which, like a sieve, perfectly separate the grain from the chaff. specified events were undoubtedly the alleged pandemic and the Russian-Ukrainian war. The last 3 years, they've pierced the political scene and shown who is who. The breakthrough has already been accomplished. We know who has what views and we besides know who and how the strategy reacted. Now it's time to get all the company together. If the leaders of the Confederates do not do so, but, on the contrary, they will be afraid with cutting extremes and silencing more harsh views, then, yes, they will like the Law and Justice, and possibly even be invited to form a coalition government. The effect is known to be: casus Samoobronny, LPR, or Solidarne Poland. simply Confa will be ,, eaten” by Kaczyński. But the Confederacy as a broad front, even sometimes with bizarre views, rough but pluralistic and active on the political stage, is simply a good nut to break teeth by writing. Contra spem spero.
Jarosław Luma
