I'd like to realize the authoritative line towards the hatred scandal. I no longer address this note to “Dear Writers” due to the fact that they bypass my blog (#saddle), but if 1 passes and can extrude this line here, he will be welcome.
If I realize correctly, it is official: an unspecified group of judges associated with Deputy Minister Piebiak conducted illegal activities on social media. As shortly as Minister Ziobro found out, he immediately resigned him, along with respective another judges.
Initially, the case was underestimated – the credibility of Emilia's hater was undermined, and it was suggested that her revealed skins could be falsified. After a fewer days, however, the truthfulness of these revelations was besides confirmed by judges who were active with it in this bizarre three-(or more?) corner.
Even in the official, pro-scriptive version, the case looks thick. respective serious paragraphs have been broken – it was not just a banal hate, that is, insults and insults, here you can besides see incitement to crime, exceeding rights and revealing material from the investigation.
Somebody ought to go down for this. Who? And this is where the authoritative version gets weird.
At the minute it sounds like Minister Ziobro didn't know anything, so he's not liable for anything. It's weird due to the fact that it's always been that the head of the department is liable for what's going on in the hotel – and if he didn't know anything, it's worse for him.
The allegations of the Law and Justice against the erstwhile power come down to the same thing. That they did not guarantee (procedure at tupolew, Amber Gold, the Vatov mob, etc.). abruptly they abandoned that rule? Okay, fine. But absurd is just coming anyway.
Emilia's headset has for a long time informed journalists and politicians about her injuries—real or alleged. Including president Kaczyński and MP Pavlowicz.
Propaganda surpasses in presenting Kaczyński's and Pawłowicz's answers as a model of professionalism. Here you go, but the fact is, since Kaczyński wrote Emilia back about her conflict with Piebiak, that means he knew about him. Ditto Pavlovich.
I find it increasingly hard to believe that Kaczyński did not ask Minister Ziobra after all, “what is happening there, I get unusual letters about your deputy minister.” Honorable PiS voters: do you believe that?
My knowing of the substance is simple. I never denied that the Polish justice strategy must be reformed.
I've been criticizing Ziebra's reforms since the beginning with a car metaphor. We have a disabled car – it will not start driving better than just replacing the driver.
Two years ago, the writers on my blog gave Ziobra a trust. They promised to justice after the fruit. possibly it's time.
Correcting the courts by exchanging judges was a stupid thought from the beginning. This was accompanied by false declarations that it was about dismissing judges ruling in the times of the Polish People's Republic – whereas today's judges in the times of the Polish People's Republic could have been the highest applicants.
Let us even presume that judges are indeed a corrupt caste of sausage thieves. What, therefore, is to set up a cleaning group and give them extraordinary powers?
It never worked. Ivan the Terrible, Danton's and Robespier's Public Rescue Committee, CHK: these are all different variants of the same idea, so as not to stick around but to introduce the Dictature of the Honest.
This thought frequently grasped, due to the fact that who would yet dare to criticize the dictatorship of the honest? Insincere!
History shows that specified Extraordinary Commissions will degrade rapidly. This is simply Nature Lucka: impunity breeds immorality.
If they had actually read about the AK alternatively of wiping their faces with Inka and Pilecki, they would know that they were besides afraid of degeneration into a common bandit. The authorities of the underground state tried to prevent this procedurally – they did not think it was adequate to be a genetic patriot and the problem would disappear.
The modern Polish right has broken all records of the pace of moral degeneration. The mouths have full moral clichés, but in practice the kid from the second matrimony have with the 3rd husband.
What about the improvement of the judiciary now, dear writers? This is our common problem, due to the fact that EU penalties will hit both us and you (and on the next finish: the ability to pay 500+).
You inactive have assurance in Ziebra and you think he has a good idea? I would love to hear your version (but I remind you: it's not Twitter, we're acting).
