They were certain of the victory. Even on the eve of the U.S. Liberal media elections were full of messages about Kamala Harris's lead, while the overall average of all polls indicated that Kamala would get 0.8 percent more votes from Trump. A peculiarly loud was the poll drawn up by Ann Selzer, considered in liberal circles to be a renowned specialist, who predicted that Kamala would win with a 3 percent points advantage in the state of Indiana, which was previously considered Trump's fortress, where he besides won in 2020.
The time of trial came, and all these “specialists” polls and forecasts proved to be nothing but propaganda and manipulation having nothing to do with reality.
W The Indians, alternatively of winning by 3 percent, Kamala lost by over 13 percent. It's a complete embarrassment to an alleged polling specialist.
Trump won everything and trampled the Democrats. Many observers, assessing this media blamage, which could not diagnose the situation and present a credible forecast, talk about the end of conventional media and indicate that the actual image of the situation can be seen in uncensored and propaganda social media platforms of the kind X Elona Muska.
This kind of reflection and distrust, especially for television, is besides my part, and for many years I have been trying to penetrate available sources on the network from where it is possible, utilizing a critical and analytical approach, to come to the fact and to supply the right forecast.
Already in September I published on FB and on the Conservatives portal.pl the text: "Who Will Be the president of the United States". This was at a time erstwhile the Democrats, after replacing Joe Biden with Kamala Harris, were in euphoria and certain victories, while their polls pointed to as much as a 7% advantage Harris had on Trump. Notwithstanding that, I clearly pointed out then that the November elections would win Trump, which besides happened.
Four years ago, Joe Biden, assuming the office of president after the 2020 problematic election, declared Trump to be just a "worried episode" and would never happen politically again.
God, who is the Lord of History, likes specified declarations, and also, as can be read in the psalms, He besides has a sense of humor and can completely reverse the arrogantly declared state of affairs.
Poor Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and their supporters have just experienced this. They have not been helped by an uncounted mass of planet celebrated celebrities who support them, whose names I do not even want to mention here, nor by a immense material advantage over Trump. In a collision with reality, all of this proved to be an insignificant element.
It would take a long time to consider different aspects of these choices, but I would just like to draw attention to 1 crucial component that fewer people see.
We do not have complete voting results so far, but 1 fact is surprising. To date, more than 90% of the votes have been counted and so far (Saturday 9 November) Trump received more than 74 million votes, and Kamala received small more than 70 million. About 10 million votes stay to be counted. This won't change the overall election results, but you can presume that the full number of Trump votes will close with about 78 million, while Kamala Harris will be about 74 million.
As far as Trump's score is concerned, it has gained about 4 million more votes in 2020, but Kamala will have a lower score than Biden in 2020 by about 5-6 million.
What happened? Why did the Democratic organization lose millions of voters?
In 2020, election turnout in blue states, where Biden won, was much higher than in red states, where Trump won.
Why wasn't that this time? The answer here is that the reason for this could have been the emergence of a large number of surplus votes in those, in much of the enveloped elections.
Many will openly say that they were dead souls who voted for Biden. Now this could not be repeated due to the fact that Covid had already passed away, but Republican supporters besides looked more at the hands of election organizers.
However, this issue will return, and 1 of Trump's main themes will be to regulate the voting rules so that there are no states where 1 can vote without any document. At the moment, there are a twelve specified states and the Democrats are the only winners. A recording from the state of California is known where a individual comes to the committee and giving completely false individual data is registered as a voter and receives a ballot card.
On the east coast, the Democrats mostly win but among states where there is no request to show documents, there is one, fresh Hampshire, where specified an work exists. And in this state Trump now only gained about 2 percent little votes than Kamala, but in neighboring states (Vermont and Massachusetts), where you can vote without documents, this difference amounted, in favour of Kamala, to over 25 percent.
The explanation of this phenomenon is self-explanatory. For us in Poland, voting in elections without proof of identity seems completely impossible and contradicting civilized principles, but in the US, in many states where Democrats rule, this is widely practiced. They're okay with it, due to the fact that it serves them and are willing to usage all the means to preserve specified an absurd system.
And finally, a general reflection. The prevailing liberal-left circles in Western countries have attempted to impose, which they have mostly succeeded, a communicative of the inevitability of changes introduced by the sex ideology, the para-religion of vocalism, and the fight against climate, in all possible manifestations of social life.
It has come to the conclusion that regulations have been introduced in the US ordering financial policy to take into account the rights of sexual minorities, whatever that means.
However, the U.S. election results show that specified changes are not inevitable and yet determined. All these liberal claims, and more like claims, about the irreversibility of the advancement they make, have no basis and they just fall to dust. In America, the wind of past has swept and has caused liberal Brussels loops to shake in Europe as well.
Stanisław Lewicki
