Kenyan physician, Dr. Wahome Ngare presented strong arguments as to why COVID-19 was utilized to force vaccination alternatively than to effectively combat the virus. He pointed to mistakes in the treatment of the COVID-19 epidemic, specified as the fact that autopsy was not allowed to be conducted to analyse how the infection was combated.
The doctor revealed further manipulations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr Wahome Ngare, manager of the Kenya Christian Professionals Forum (KCPF) gave Lynn Ngugi an interview a fewer days ago. At first he explained that vaccinations have always been reserved for diseases that are sufficiently dangerous to carry the hazard of stimulating the human immune strategy by means of a virus or part of it. Therefore, they are directed at healthy, not sick people. In case of vaccination of patients, they carry an additional risk.
– If the vaccine is defective, you can endanger the full community – that is why vaccines become a national safety issue, due to the fact that if they are not decently tested and given to the full healthy population, we can do quite a few damage. said Ngare. Therefore, he thinks it is much better to treat patients than to direct untested preparations to healthy people.
With respect to the alleged "vaccine" against COVID, he suggested that the hazard associated with it was much higher than with a typical vaccine, partially due to the fact that the full results of the phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials to tell us whether it was safe and effective were not published until December 2023, and so 3 years after the outbreak of COVID.
– The only reason this information was revealed is due to the fact that individual went to court and sued Pfizer in the United States, and the court forced her to disclose the documents. Ngare noticed. He further explained that the results of these studies revealed many problems caused by COVID vaccines, including NOPs specified as myocardial infarction and even death. – As doctors, we failed the world. We should not have given any support to this injection without seeing the results of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials – he said.
– erstwhile COVID first appeared, people did not realize what it was – they only knew that people died in China. Therefore, the first thing doctors should do was execute postmortem examinations of people who died of COVID. This was the only way to find which authorities were affected, how they were affected, where this virus caused the top harm and how it caused the damage – he continued.
– Information from the autopsy is critically crucial as it helps researchers start designing and choosing both treatment and prevention measures for the virus. Instead, we were advised to bury those who died of COVID, “within 24 hours”. This is completely unscientific due to the fact that it deprives us of the cognition we request to take care of the living. – reminded.
He then highlighted an alarmingly large number of wasted opportunities to strategically deal with COVID, starting with the deficiency of recommendations for maintaining advanced levels of vitamin D to defend due to the fact that there is evidence that low levels of vitamin D impair people's ability to handle the virus.
As 1 of Ngare's main errors, he stated that people were advised to go to the infirmary only if they had difficulty breathing, while this could be predicted by checking the oxygen level at home and reporting to the infirmary erstwhile the oxygen level was 60–70 before they even experienced breathing difficulties.
He then referred to the fact that in medicine, the standard is the re-use of drugs that have proven to be both useful and safe, but proven medicines specified as hydroxychloroquine, whose safety has been proven, were set aside for experimental ‘vaccinations’ on COVID, whose safety and efficacy were questionable. Furthermore, hydroxychlorquine has not been adequately tested for the treatment of COVID. Patients were given this medicine besides late, which led healthcare professionals to mislabel it as inappropriate to treat COVID.
He then told how the infection gave stronger immunity than vaccines, stressing that this fact was ignored by wellness professionals. He explained that if individual becomes infected with an infection, it develops immunity to each protein, making it full resistant erstwhile the next time it is exposed to the virus. The vaccine only protects against any parts of the virus.
– The individual who infected and recovered has stronger immunity than the 1 who received the preparation. What's the point of saying that if you already have COVID, you inactive request a vaccine? From a technological point of view, it didn't make sense. – he added.
In conclusion, Ngare pointed out that all the facts given by him regarding the time of the “pandemic” show that the full crisis was utilized to force people to vaccinate alternatively than to actually deal with the disease. – If only those who promoted the vaccine against COVID-19 have the right to express their opinion and those who advance another forms of prevention and treatment have the right to receive it, it is clear that it has any hidden purpose - He concluded.
We besides recommend: Scientists have hidden studies indicating the harmfulness of sex blockers
