Deputy talker of the Sejm Krzysztof Bosak
Jacek Bartosiak and Marcin Kędzierski are right that focusing on the analysis of the presidents' argument is more obscure than explained. Here is my brief assessment:
1. The deal Trump and Zelenski signed was meaningless. Written on the knee, not legally binding, not truly prejudging. It was expected to be Trump's propaganda motion towards the Americans.
2. Trump, contrary to election promises and possibly against his own imagination, was incapable to get a fast peace from Putin. There's nothing to intimidate him or pay him. inactive Putin decides how long this war will last, no substance who's in the White House. No surprise.
3. Trump besides has nothing circumstantial to propose Ukraine. The first proposal of the deposits was frivolous and offensive, the second better, but without strategical significance. This war is not about profits from deposits that have not been and are not mined.
4. There was an argument due to the fact that both sides have neither trust nor sympathy nor a plan to do anything together. It happened due to the fact that it could have happened. possibly it happened due to the fact that 1 or both sides were looking for it.
5. Ukraine, of course, can lose on this argument due to the fact that it is simply a good excuse for Trump to cut off 1 or the another aid instrument. Trump's problem, however, is that he can no longer control the situation by not playing 1 goal with Europe. The remainder of the planet can enter Ukraine in place of the United States. The States willing to rub Washington's nose is not short.
They're right @BartosiakJacek and @KedierskiMarcThat focusing on analyzing presidents' arguments is more obscure than he explains. Here is my brief assessment:
1. The deal Trump and Zelenski signed was meaningless. Written on his knee, not legally binding, nothing so...
6. Zelenski acts as if he is certain that he has the essential scope of independency and subjectivity besides without an American umbrella. If it's true, time will tell. If there isn't, he made a tragic mistake yesterday, the price of which will be paid by Ukrainian society. If this has his deficiency of professionalism and impertinence will proceed to be tolerated in global forums.
7. Europe clearly does not have a single policy on Ukraine, whereas Trump, his désintéressement on Ukraine, forces Europe to rapidly clarify leadership and specify its own strategy. I wonder what's gonna come of it. possibly the first time since the start of the Libya war, the decisions of European leaders will find the existence or collapse of another countries.
8. The U.S. led by Trump de facto abdicates from military leadership in Europe, which puts NATO's ability to deter. I agree with the pessimistic assessments that Putin can effort to test it.
9. The accounting of the percentages of GDP on defence in Europe has been secondary to the political will to usage troops and the intellectual readiness of societies to participate. We are witnessing the formation of a two-speed Europe in defence matters.
10. The EU institutions in this process are almost entirely irrational. The Polish Presidency is irrelevant.
11. Poland does not presently play a leading function in crystallising the EU strategy towards the US, Ukraine and Russia, but there is no reason to be nervous. Let the larger and further obstetric states clarify their positions. Our situation is clear. We safe the border with Russia and Belarus, service the hubs in Rzeszów and the full transport, host all the interviews of the planet operating in Ukraine, the president reduces relations with the Americans, we arm ourselves and spend as much as we request on defense. We are a affirmative mention point. We just gotta carry on wisely.
Mentzen Route2025. The list of localities to visit in the close future is available at: https://www.facebook.com/slawomirmentzen/events and on the website == sync, corrected by elderman ==.
Entry Krzysztof Bosak: My brief assessment of the situation (after the Trump-Zeleński meeting) pochodzi z serwisu Confederation.
