The fresh controversy surrounding the US Ambassador Tom Rose's announcement of breaking ties with the Marshal of the Sejm Vladimir Czarzasty – although unprecedented – fits into a broader framework of digital diplomacy. This has gained importance in the last 2 decades and plays an crucial function in American – although not only – abroad policy. In the release of US ambassadors, it is assertive, and sometimes aggressive, and applied besides to allies.
Many wonder why the Americans, who declare to be our good allies, behave in specified an aggressive way, ostentatically interfering with our state's interior policy?
However, specified behaviour – although not pleasant and should meet with disapproval – is not uncommon. It is not only a Polish problem either.
Our relation with the US
Over the last 3 decades, relations between the United States and Poland have been close and based on cooperation. The Americans powerfully supported our country's accession to NATO in 1999 and its entry into the European Union 5 years later. Washington was pleased with Warsaw's engagement in “military operations” conducted by the US and NATO in Iraq and Afghanistan, despite the fresh criticism of president Donald Trump.
Poland and the United States have worked closely together on many issues of abroad and global safety policy, especially recently, in connection with Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Poland is mostly seen by American decision-makers as a strategical partner on the east flank of NATO. Trump administration officials considered Poland to be a "model US ally". The United States has besides deployed any 10,000 troops in our country. They're selling us more weapons and military equipment to upgrade the army.
From 2023 to 2024 The Americans provided Warsaw with about $11 billion as loans and debt guarantees under the abroad Military Financing (FMF) program, to acquisition military articles and services in the US.
Our country besides plays an crucial function as 1 of the main providers of assistance to Ukraine and a key logistics hub and transit hub for global assistance to Ukraine.
According to American imagination and wish, Warsaw advocated among NATO members for expanding defence spending to 5% of GDP. In 2024 Poland had the highest defence expenditure of all NATO members in relation to GDP (4.1%). In addition, she took an ambitious initiative to grow the armed forces and get fresh weapons.
In the last decade in order to become independent of the imports of energy from Russia, Warsaw has become powerfully active in the Trimorz Initiative, implementing infrastructure projects that enable transport of liquefied gas. We built a LNG terminal in Świnoujście and a pipeline connecting our country to Norway. Currently, the United States is the largest LNG supplier to Poland and increases oil supply as well. The consortium of American companies has signed a contract with our authorities to build the first atomic power plant on our lands.
For congressmen, relations with Poland are crucial due to bilateral defence cooperation, NATO's future, modernization of the local armed forces, actions to halt further Russian aggression, support for Ukraine, energy safety and trade relations.
Our country remains 1 of the most pro-American in Europe for years – and even now, despite controversy.
After Russia's annexation of Crimea, cooperation with the Americans intensified. It is worth noting that we are 1 of the main partners supporting Washington in assessing and responding to threats to the east flank of NATO. Since 2022 Warsaw and another cities have visited many congressmen's delegations to consult with Polish representatives and supervise defence obligations and US military activities in Central and east Europe. The Polish Club operates in Congress, including a cross-party group of deputies. It focuses on strengthening the relation between the US and Poland and building a commitment to issues of common interest to both countries.
The Americans emphasise that our economy is 1 of the most prosperous in Central and east Europe. Poland's economical growth is among the highest in the EU, although it is not awesome and remains at around 3%. comparatively advanced inflation and weak request from the main trading partners are among the major challenges of our country.
Washington decided to include Poles in the visa-free movement programme only in 2019, thus solving a long-term problem in bilateral relations.
Following last year's presidential election, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a message in which he congratulated president Elek Nawrock. He assured that the 2 sides had a "strong and sustainable partnership based on common commitment to security, prosperity and the regulation of law". He pointed out that "Poland is simply a model ally and a key entity strengthening the North Atlantic Alliance and its sovereign integrity in the face of current and future challenges". He talked about deepening cooperation in the energy and defence sectors.
During a visit to Warsaw before a year ago, U.S. Secretary of defence Pete Hegseth described Poland as a “strategic partner on the front line on the east flank of NATO”. He stated that America "sees Poland as a model ally on the continent, willing to invest not only in its defence, but besides in the common defence and defence of the continent."
Two major political parties: the PO and the Law and Justice organization support a strong partnership with the United States. In 2024 Prime Minister Tusk and president Duda visited the White home together on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of Poland's accession to NATO. At the same time, the current head of government advocated building Europe's own defence capabilities while maintaining a close relation with the United States.
Although relations between Poland and the US stay mostly positive, tensions arose between Tusk and Trump administration. As president of the European Council, the Prime Minister has repeatedly criticised the Republican leader of the United States. In a media interview of February 2025, he described him as a "difficult partner", whose approach to the war in Ukraine and relations with Russia poses challenges for Poland and Europe. He besides added: "We must work effectively with him, without illusions and panic." At the Munich safety Conference in February 2025, abroad Minister Radosław Sikorski identified president Trump's direct contacts with Russia's president Putin as "a mistake" and stated that "the credibility of the United States depends on how this war ends".
During the presidential run in 2025, the Trump administration expressed support for Karol Nawrocki (who yet won the election) alternatively of a candidate supported by Tusk. Prior to the election, the later winner visited president Trump at the White home on 1 May 2025. US Secretary of interior safety Kristi Noem supported him while in Poland.
Some members of the legislature expressed concerns about the regulation of law in the Republic of Poland under Tusk. Earlier, any U.S. officials, both behind the Biden administration and Trump's first administration, expressed concerns about the regulation of law in Poland under the Law and Justice Law.
It can be said that trade relations between the 2 countries are increasingly developing. The value of US exports to Poland is expanding – in 2024 it amounted to $16.3 billion. Goods and services for $18 billion went the another way. In 2023, the value of direct US investments in Poland was $14.8 billion, and Poland's direct investments in the United States was only $498 million. In 2022 (according to the latest available data), US-owned subsidiaries employed around 232 600 people in Poland. The US companies that invested crucial funds in Poland include Amazon, Citigroup, General Electric, IBM, Lear, Mars, Procter & Gamble, RTX, Whirlpool and 3M.
According to the U.S. State Department, in early 2025 the full value of U.S. military equipment sales to Poland was around $20 billion. Since 2016, we have acquired 32 F-35 aircraft; 96 AH-64E assault helicopters Apache; 250 M1A2 Abrams primary tanks and 116 M1A1 Abrams primary tanks; integrated Patriot-3+ anti-aircraft defence systems; advanced mobility artillery rocket systems (HIMARS); advanced air-air and air-ground class rocket missiles; Javelin anti-tank missiles; and we upgraded and serviced F-16 aircraft.
The Americans stress that "the war of Russia with Ukraine has fundamentally changed safety prospects on the east flank of NATO and has strengthened Poland's function in European security". Washington predicts that our country will "probably besides stay a strong ally of the US, as well as an increasingly crucial partner in Europe, especially in the field of safety and defence cooperation."
Although the Polish Republic plays an crucial function in the safety and defence issues of the east flank of NATO, and besides becomes an increasingly crucial trading partner for the United States, many afraid about the way the representatives of the Polish authorities were treated by American ambassadors, especially during Donald Trump's 1st word of office, and later for the presidency of Joe Biden and yet again during Trump's 2nd term.
Mosbacher, Brzeziński and Rose
In the first of these periods, erstwhile the US Ambassador to Poland from 2018 to 2021 was Georgette Mosbacher, there were respective unpleasant incidents. In a "golden age" strategical partnership focused on security, defence and energy cooperation, Mosbacher has played an crucial function in the implementation of the "Fort Trump" concept. It led, among another things, to signing in 2020 Enhanced defence Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), on expanding the rotational presence, by at least 1,000 extra US soldiers on our land. It besides contributed to the expansion of the Divisional advanced Command in Poznań and key infrastructure projects. She was liable for raising funds for the Tri-Sea Initiative. For her ambassadors the Americans yet abolished visa restrictions for Poles. Mosbacher supported the conclusion of contracts speeding up the transport of liquefied gas from the US to Poland. At the same time, she defended the Polish authorities against attacks of EU officials who accused her of violating the regulation of law. president Andrzej Duda awarded the Ambassador of the Cross of the Grand Order of Merit to the Republic of Poland in designation of outstanding merit in developing Polish-American friendly relations and cooperation, for his commitment to global safety activities.
However, Mosbacher was besides celebrated for the ruthless defence of TVN (a then owned by the American company Discovery) and opposed the ideas of "media deconcentration", recognising them as a threat to freedom of speech. In a letter sent in 2018 to Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, she reprimanded the Polish authorities for arguing for the interests of investors from the USA. Not only was the letter not in its form "diplomatic", but it besides contained errors in the spelling of the names of Polish politicians, which, especially in the case of diplomacy, is not suitable and can be perceived as a deficiency of respect for hosts.
An American authoritative was besides celebrated for criticizing opponents of ideology gender. In 2020, she stated that Poland is “on the incorrect side of history” on the issue of “LGBT rights”.
She was peculiarly active in celebrating judaic holidays. In 2019, Good Friday, she tweeted: “On the occasion of this evening’s Pesach festival, commemorating the Israelites’ departure from Egyptian captivity, I want you peace and a joyful holiday! Chag Pesach Sameach, Happy Passover!It’s okay. ” The wishes of many were read as provocation in a country with strong Catholic traditions.
She besides intervened in connection with the amendment of the IPN Act, suggesting that Poland is liable for the rebirth of anti-Semitism in Europe. She besides tried to calm the public, accusing politicians, among others, of the Confederacy for allegedly misleading the public in connection with Law 447 concerning the transfer of judaic property to undecided organizations belonging to the erstwhile owners' compatriots.
Already as a erstwhile ambassador, in August 2025 she powerfully criticized the absence of Polish representatives at an crucial summit in the White House, suggesting that it was the responsibility of our administration.
Undoubtedly, Ambassador Mosbacher, a trusted friend of Donald Trump, had a very good relation in Washington, D.C. and was known for his ability to rise large funds for Republican campaigns, raised quite a few controversy. Just as the way our country was treated by then Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who – not counting the negative consequences for Poland and threats from Tehran – organized the Warsaw Summit with anti-Iran sharps in 2019. It was to be officially devoted to matters of peace in the mediate East. The summit deliberately coincided with another Iranian-Russian-Turkish conference dedicated to the political resolution of the Syrian crisis, as well as with the 40th anniversary of the muslim Revolution in Iran.
Just before going to Warsaw, Pompeo visited Budapest and Bratislava to fight Russian-Chinese influences in Central Europe and consolidate these countries around the Trimorese Initiative. They would, like Poland, buy energy and fresh technologies from Americans and their allies, including Israel.
Mark Brzeziński – the successor of Mosbacher, who had never previously served as an ambassador, but was loyal to Trump – appointed as a typical of the USA in Warsaw by the administration of Joe Biden besides caused much controversy.
The US Ambassador to Warsaw from 2022 to 2025 was mostly liable for coordinating American-Polish cooperation in connection with the war in Ukraine. During his office, he stressed that bilateral relations reached a evidence level of cooperation and stressed that Poland is the main guarantor of the safety of east Europe. He organised 2 Biden visits to our country and stressed the function of common values, specified as democracy, the regulation of law, etc.
However, he besides pressed the "Lex TVN" Act and urged president Duda to veto it. It has frequently caused tension with the then Law and Justice government. He stentfully supported – what he declared before becoming an ambassador – the LGBTQI+ subculture. He opposed the adoption of the law on the examination of Russian influence. He met with representatives of the initiative “Free Courts”, which was considered to be interference in the interior affairs of Poland and engagement on 1 side of the political dispute.
Brzeziński caused outrage primarily by interfering straight with the legislative process in our country. He wrote letters with objections or even instructions to the talker of the Polish Sejm, demanding explanations or amendments to any laws. Prof. Ryszard Legutko commented that “it is something extraordinary” and this showed that the ambassador acted like “a politician who wants to take over or part of it” within the empire.
A typical of Biden's administration even interfered in specified a case as the passing of the Act on the conversion of the right to usage perpetual land built for housing purposes into property rights. In a letter to the Marshal of the Sejm, he was to emphasize that these records were to be dangerous to the interests of the United States.
For a man who had quite a few diplomatic experience (e.g. he was an ambassador to Sweden), unlike Mosbacher, as well as extended business contacts, Brzeziński showed large nerve, not respecting the Polish authorities.
In January 2025 he resigned, paving the way for Tom Rose to represent a fresh approach in diplomacy. erstwhile again, Trump's trusted man, loyal to the president of the United States, has an even more assertive kind of diplomacy that has nothing to do with classical diplomacy. Although Rose emphasizes that Poland is seen as a fresh leader in Europe to cement relations with Washington, especially in matters of safety and Ukraine, and to increase expenses for defence and trade, it does not avoid spectacular actions specified as the last declaration on breaking contacts with Marshal of the Sejm Vladimir Czarzasty.
Former publisher of the Jerusalem Post and critic of the Tusk government, known for his strong pro-Israeli views, trusted advisor to erstwhile US Vice president Mike Pence, a staunch Christian Zionist, defender of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, takes steps to destruct from the Polish politics Grzegorz Braun and his formation, representing the views of a large part of voters.
While he stood up for the Polish underground authorities, pointing out that they were not active in suppressing the Warsaw Ghetto uprising – as suggested by NBC writer Andrea Mitchell – but resisted the Germans, he besides took unprecedented action to influence our country's interior policy.
He is “a fiery conservative, a staunch Zionist, and an orthodox Jew”, so it is expected that he will be more ostentatious in defending the interests of the judaic diaspora. This is what Deputy Marshal Krzysztof Bosak is afraid of, who late branded Rose's unacceptable force on the composition of the future government in Poland. At the same time, the leader of the Confederacy suggested that Jarosław Kaczyński's attitude towards the formation of Grzegorz Braun may be the consequence of external pressures – by default, an American ambassador who met with the president of the Law and Justice.
Kaczyński and his organization members are notoriously attacking Braun. The president stressed that the leader of the KPP is “a policy beyond the borders adopted in our civilisation” and that the presence of “Braun people” in the government could pose a threat to the safety of the state.
Bosak rightly pointed out that “resonating the narratives of abroad diplomats” during speeches and meetings with voters Jarosław Kaczyński over-restricted the rank of abroad ambassadors, making them almost governors.
In this context, then, it is worth asking ourselves whether the American ambassadors in fresh years have been allowing themselves to increasingly impertinent interference in the interior affairs of Poland, is not the responsibility of politicians themselves in contact with them and seeking their response?
The question is besides raised as to whether the Polish diplomatic services are sufficiently active to defend national interests, what do the Americans anticipate from allies, and what have they expressed in their National safety strategy published late last year?
This is crucial in the context of, for example, the celebrated ban on trade in AI technologies, which was covered by Poland, and only after a fewer months these restrictions were revoked.
Our politicians besides have a clear problem with adapting their abroad service to the requirements of the current digital diplomacy, which unfortunately has started to play a key function in exercising power and influencing public opinion.
The increasing function of Digital Diplomacy
Social media has transformed social and political life in fresh years. Twitter/X was peculiarly popular with politicians and diplomatic representatives. It was in the posts posted on this platform before the signing of the Powers Agreement with Iran in 2015 to limit the improvement of the atomic programme (JCPOA), that Iranian and American officials had expressed their willingness to regulate strained relations for almost 2 years earlier.
Since the break-up of diplomatic relations between the US and Iran in 1980, it has seemed improbable to open for close-up. There were besides fewer opportunities for high-level diplomatic interactions. Relations between the 2 countries were based on common accusations and stiffening of positions and introducing fresh sanctions and threats of military invasion.
Twitter played an crucial function during the alleged arabian Spring, let alone the quarrel and escalation of tension between the US and China during president Donald Trump's first term. The full expression of the exchange of posts by the American leader besides took place with erstwhile Mexican president Vicente Fox (they active building a border wall), with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and any European politicians.
Through Twitter, diplomats and political leaders signaled intentions and besides active abroad counterparts in the discussion. Almost in real time – not as previously as a consequence of the circulation of authoritative correspondence in a much longer period – sometimes the will to cooperate was declared or its failure by representatives of diplomacy of different countries.
On Twitter, China's abroad Minister Wang Yi called on his colleagues to accept the "spirit of combat" against the United States in connection with the Hong Kong trade war and protests. Chinese diplomat Lijian Zhao, on the another hand, accused the US of being “unfair”, “inhuman” and “hypocritic, accusing Americans of “race discrimination”. Firearm force has declared “a chronic illness profoundly rooted in American society”. He made China a model of moral virtues to follow.
The alleged digital diplomacy is now playing a immense function in Ukraine's politics, which, through social media, creates an image of this war, mobilises forces, draws money and presents its communicative of events worldwide. Similarly, through Telegram the Russians make their image of reality.
On Twitter, there was a passionate exchange of views between the agitated leaders of Greece and Turkey arguing for policy towards refugees, gas resources in the Mediterranean, etc.
Social media replaced carefully formulated diplomatic press releases on positions in abroad policy, and in many cases it is not possible to talk about the art of diplomacy but its distortion.
According to communication expert David Bollier, "the net and another information technologies are no longer a peripheral force in planet affairs but a powerful driver of change". Social media has lifted a bit of a secret about diplomatic activities.
Politicians can observe social sentiments in real time and plan changes in collective attitudes. Platforms have become another authoritative tool for politics, and even another battlefield, making diplomacy a spectacle, show. Many ambassadors evidence from their reel offices, which present them in unobvious situations. They effort to warm their image and gain sympathy from the people of the countries where they execute their mission.
Social media undoubtedly started a fresh era of digital diplomacy. More and more countries – specified as Austria and Denmark – are developing strategies for specified diplomacy, which could possibly make even more tensions on the global phase or contribute to regulating hard relations between countries. It all depends on the objectives of politics and work of the diplomatic corps, leaders choosing to replace alleged corridor diplomacy, posts on X, etc.
Such diplomacy has its own dynamics. But social media is gaining importance for another reasons too. As neuroscience investigation progresses, leaders are convinced that online platforms can be a tool to build a certain level of trust – which would otherwise be hard to accomplish – and to form public opinion. This opinion has an impact on abroad policy as all actions taken are immediately commented on both at home and abroad.
There is an expanding emphasis on emotions and emotional dispositions that influence rational judgement about events, people, etc. A large deal of importance is attached to the work on mirror neurons, which are designed to supply better insight into the knowing of emotional disposition psychology and their impact on individual communication. The survey of intentions is simply a key aspect of diplomacy. So far, concrete intentions have been read in meetings of leaders face to face. X is simply a tool for shaping opinions and checking and confirming worldview, as well as for influencing and assessing social sentiments.
Transaction Diplomacy and State Department Purification
It is besides gaining the importance of the "transaction diplomacy" promoted by Americans who are trying to accomplish concrete results quickly, alternatively than in the long term, and specified expectations are being put on fresh ambassadors.
And if we take account of the actions taken by the current Trump administration, which wants to clear the State Department of professional diplomats, disloyal to the MAGA programme, then we will realize that the problem with the imperial conduct of US ambassadors in Poland is much wider and besides concerns another Washington allies and the American political scene in general.
He continues to resonate the issue of dismissal in December of last year by the president of the United States almost 30 professional ambassadors. Trump and his squad believe that the State Department is dominated by the establishment, which in an open or more veiled way harms his politics. For example, any abroad service representatives who did not share the current imagination of a abroad strategy were expected to engage with abroad politicians and tell them otherwise than Trump says, and were besides deliberately passing on hundreds of different papers to hostile media to hit the president's administration. Therefore, the current American leader and a group of his closest associates have attempted to "clean up" diplomacy from disloyal people. Hence the dismissals of experienced ambassadors and the appointments of novices who neither have appropriate education nor even diplomatic experience.
Recently, “The Guardian” has critically written about “MEGA envoys who are amazed in Europe”, pointing to relatives, close friends and donors – “of whom barely anyone has diplomatic experience” – appointed ambassadors on our continent. They will be liable for correcting Europe's current trajectory due to the fact that it is "weak", "falls" and faces "civilising erasure".
Ambassadors were: “There was a burger mogul; there was a fiancée of his eldest son; the owner of the Houston Rockets basketball team; the maker of musicals on Broadway; the co-founder of PayPal; and a convicted criminal who is at the same time the father of his son-in-law,” says the article “Like Maga discoples”: meet the Trump envoys racing eyebrows in Europe of 19 December 2025
The French envoy in the United States, Gérard Aroud, expressed his top embarrassment and outrage with fresh appointments. After announcing the names of respective ambassadors, he stated: “The madness of these appointments reflects the complete contempt for human dignity, customs, and law. The only thing that matters is the whim.”
For example, Charles Kushner, who has been the U.S. Ambassador to Paris since May of the year, admitted 16 counts of taxation evasion, false testimony, and manipulating witnesses (especially for hiring a prostitute to seduce his brother-in-law due to the fact that he testified against him). Kushner spent 14 months in prison. In 2020 Trump pardoned him. In gratitude, Kushner donated $1 million to Super Pac Trump's organization, Make America large Again Inc.
Shortly after his appointment as Ambassador, he was celebrated for writing an open letter to French president Emmanuel Macron, where he criticised the deficiency of authoritative action in the fight against "a dramatic increase in anti-Semitism in France". Kushner consults Marine Le Pen and Jordan Bardella with the right-wing National Assembly (RN). It can be said that it interferes with the interior politics of France and does not effort to relieve tensions – what diplomats should do – but it increases them. However, he surely does what Trump wants.
Another EU Ambassador Andrew Puzder, erstwhile CEO of the network franchise company fast food Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr., do not shun the attack on the migration policy of Brussels, which leads to a ‘fall of cultural values’.
The US Ambassador to Luxembourg is Stacey Feinberg, an entrepreneur, investor, Republican organization donor, Broadway maker and luck heiress, and a good friend of the murdered activist Charlie Kirk. She acknowledges Trump as “the largest president of the United States since George Washington.”
Tilman Fertitta, owner of the Houston Rockets basketball squad and Landry’s network, which runs over 600 hotels, restaurants and casinos throughout the United States, is the US Ambassador to Rome. He's been doing business with Trump for decades.
Ken Howery, co-founder of PayPala, is the US Ambassador to Denmark.
Kimberly Guilfoyle, erstwhile Fox News presenter and erstwhile fiancée of Trump Jr. became an ambassador to Greece, where she is to search out another “husband”. As 1 of the Guardians said, the female “is smart but besides very direct and as non-graduate as Trump”.
At present, ambassadors are simply becoming "non-graduate" and, moreover, are even encouraged to carry out assertive digital diplomacy. And it's not Trump's specialty. Hillary Clinton had already encouraged the then US Ambassador to Moscow to attack Vladimir Putin and his supporters on social media.
During Trump's first word with many attacks by Ambassador Richard Grennel, the overt homosexual faced Germany. Grennel announced that "it will absolutely strengthen conservative politicians throughout Europe". A diplomat without erstwhile experience in the abroad service, but having very good contacts in Washington, he was, among others, a spokesperson for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, straight attacked leftist politicians from the SPD.
As you can see, the situation in the field of abroad policy has changed importantly since the emergence of social media and the progressive digitalisation. Although we may not like it, it forces adaptation to deal with the impertinent actions of non-graduate ambassadors. There is besides no excessive consequence to emotional manipulation on their part, but it should be made clear that any actions are not accepted by us.
Diplomacy, which utilized to be the art of mitigating tensions between states and should have been conducted in accordance with certain principles by experienced and carefully educated people in this area, served to build long-term desirable relations, search allies, balance national national interests with collective responsibility.
This art, institutionalized in the 17th century through the establishment of authoritative missions in Europe, carried out on the basis of a formal code of conduct, became distorted over time, interfering in more and more areas of human life. In addition, at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries, another actors, specified as corporations, unions and NGOs, came to the floor, and diplomacy ceased to be the exclusive prerogative of states and their embassies. These fresh actors began to impose ideological visions of regulation of almost all area of life, implementing a complex strategy of transnational governance, characterised by the creation of a scope of frequently informal networks and alliances with a advanced corporate involvement. "Diplomats" have become ombudsmen of the interests of different groups alternatively than express the views of the authorities representing the nation. Trump, although himself mixing private interests with national interests, decided to break up this globalist network of diplomats that did not necessarily carry out American interests. By appointing as ambassadors people from outside the treaty and weakening organisations that do not defend America's interests (e.g. the withdrawal of backing for the various UN agencies) consciously or by not giving a signal to another countries to rebuild their full abroad policy to refocus on the realisation of their own alternatively than global interests.
Trump took action that they wanted to do, for example: president Harry Truman, erstwhile in 1952 he lamented that “The State Department is clandestine and arrogant” and “sometimes feels like releasing the full crew.” Similarly, 2 decades later, president Richard M. Nixon told Henry Kissinger, his national safety advisor and future Secretary of State, that he intended to “ruin the abroad Service. truly ruin it.”
None of the presidents have fulfilled their plan. But any action has just been taken by Trump, who fires experienced diplomats who neglect to implement the program America First and replaces them with political denominations, close friends, loyal to him. They can behave impertinently, causing embarrassment and consternation among local politicians. But they besides communicate their intentions without a doubt, and they surely have even better "coming" to the most crucial individual in the country than professional diplomats.
We are parents of authorities and citizens besides stay open communication via social media – almost in real time – that specified or another actions do not like and will not be tolerated. At the same time, there should proceed to be a substantive exchange of views on essential matters, defending our own interests. due to the fact that only specified politicians are respected by Americans who profess the "Trump Doctrine" full formulated by Michael Anton, who was a associate of the U.S. National safety Council from February 2017 to April 2018 and deputy assistant president for strategical communication, and is now the manager of Policy Planning at the State Department.
Agnieszka Stelmach
