Finish Yourself, shame spare!

The celebrated scene from the movie adaptation of the fresh "The Flood" is very frequently cited in political debates, but not necessarily in the correct interpretation. “End of shame, spare” is the words of Andrzej Kmicic directed to Michał Wołodyjowski and do not concern the shame of Volodyjowski, but Kmicic. Thus, if a individual makes this celebrated issue, he must be aware that he is asking for mercy for himself, although any “warrior” is convinced that That's how he humiliates his opponent..

Looking at what is happening in the Poland 2050 party, a false explanation of the scene from the “ Flood” would have full application, due to the fact that it is about to shout “End, shame save”. The problem is that there is not a single liable individual in the full organization who would interrupt this torment, preferably with the appropriate usage of the meaning of the words of Andrzej Kmicic. Poland's 2050 politicians should make a strong appeal for individual to shorten their torment, but alternatively they decided to play a masochistic tragedy. erstwhile it seemed that nothing more curiosistic than the resignation of Szymon Holownia, leader and founder of Poland 2050, could happen, then the reality began to exceed the imagination. After his resignation, Simon Holovnia decided to make an additional fool of moving for UN Commissioner, but this was not the end of the disastrous series either.

The real disaster started just before the election for the fresh organization chief was announced. The messages sent by leading Polish 2050 politicians amazed all day. Michał Kobasko, 1 of the party's co-founders, first tried to force Simon Holovnia to change his decision, then announced his candidacy himself to resign at the end. Ryszard Petru, who had already spectacularly distributed another political task called "Modern", volunteered for the function of Poland's 2050 savior, but in the election he died steeply, out of the 5 candidates took the penultimate place, winning only 95 votes. 2 ladies went to the second round, from the beginning indicated as favourites: Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz and Paulina Hennig-Kloska. It seemed that the final vote would be a formality, due to the fact that all the candidates who dropped off were supported by Paulina Hennig-Kloska, but that did not happen!

Before the first round, the first media reports of foul play appeared. any activists accused Catherine Pełczyńska-Nałęcz of buying votes with positions. In this dense atmosphere there was besides a letter sent by Szymon Hołownia, which was read as an effort to support Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz. On the 1 hand, there is nothing unusual about all of this, and in the end all political election boosts emotions and there is simply a dirty run in everyone, but interior elections tend to be much more peaceful than rivalry between individual parties. In Poland 2050 there was no minute of peace, and tension reached specified a level that after many hours of waiting for the results of the second round, the committee issued a message that the vote was invalidated for “technical reasons”.

Full embarrassment, the bigger that little than 1,000 people were active in the vote and did not gotta go to the polling stations, they just pointed out their candidate via net connection. At the moment, Poland 2050 has a below-statistical mistake of 1.5-2.5 percent, and looking at what has happened in fresh days it is hard to recognise that the polls are undervalued, alternatively they look besides optimistic. Regardless of what the final result of the election will be, surely not all activists will consider it credible and this another large step towards the fall of this party. Sooner or later Donald Tusk will consummate this "appetizer", although it is already appropriate to have political leftovers alternatively than an appetizer.

We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!