Europe has had 3 military powers for decades: England, France and Russia. Germany was not a military power for 80 years. And although Germany lost planet War II and has not yet signed the peace treaty, The national Republic of Germany saw fast growth: the alleged economical miracle. But it's over.
For more than 50 years, the lives of people in Germany have been much better than in 3 more militaryly powerful countries. It's not pure coincidence or happiness. Prosperity was based on the fact that the economy did not gotta compete with a military apparatus that absorbed immense money, specialists and the attention of the rulers, and besides claimed the right to priorities.
Chancellor of Militaryization
The military suggests to politicians that it is more crucial than the well-being of the population, due to the fact that it is always about triumph or failure. specified argument presupposes war as a average condition that begins already in the time of peace and will surely happen. But our economical miracle has shown that without war politics peace is very profitable and is not threatened from outside. Focusing on the economy and on coexistence is closer to life than constantly drawing money, materials and intelligence to the questionable option of war in the future. These blissful times for Germany are over.
It besides ended, accidentally or not, a happy consensus reached in parliament that Chancellor, including Angela MerkelHe was elected in all word in the first round. Friedrich Merz introduces a fresh era: he fell into the office of the Chancellor, though, or possibly it is due to the fact that everyone knows that he has peculiarly large plans: he wants to be Chancellor and head of the military power.
Big height, little...
The directions have been designated. Merz has already achieved that the largest debt in the past of the West Germany has been approved, primarily for the intent of drastic reinforcement. He seems to want to match England and France, or perhaps, with economical strength behind him, shortly surpass them. It can be seen that Germany with a large pump opposes the peaceful attitude of the United States.
If Mr. Merz hadn't been 1.98 metres tall, we could have talked about megalomania, but it's the opposite. It's large adequate to have strong ego, is not tiny and filigree as Napoleonwho as commander was out of range, but fell into megalomania, allowing himself to be crowned as emperor and attacking Russia like Hitler. However, at a tallness of 1.98 metres, Merza's brain may not always be nourished enough, which manifests itself with noticeable weaknesses in thinking.
Russia liberating
Friedrich Merz failed intellectually to deal with the transition from a financial player to a liable politician, and yet to a chancellor who is to be obliged to care for the welfare of the nation. He lacks flexibility and creativity. incorrect conclusions are increasing and there is no basic updating in thinking.
The task of transition from a nation of prosperity to military power needs Russia as an enemy, at least in the narratives concerning German armaments it is presented so. Meanwhile, Russia was only an enemy of Germany erstwhile it was attacked from this direction. Russian soldiers yet liberated Germany from the Nazi dictatorship, passed through Berlin with large losses and led Adolf Hitler and Joseph Goebbels, along with their families, to suicide.
No reason to be hostile
It was only after the defeat at Stalingrad and the conflict of Kursk that the war in late 1943 was already lost that American soldiers landed in Normandy in 1944. All the stories that depict the US as a large liberator do not change the historical fact that Nazi Germany (Hitler) lost planet War II primarily to the USSR (Stalin).
More than 25 million Soviets were killed as a consequence of the German attack, most of whom were Russian soldiers, but inactive Mikhail Gorbachev He agreed to unite Germany. There is absolutely no reason for Germany's deep hostility towards Russia. All arguments relate only to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which can be condemned, but defining it as an attack on Germany, Europe and Western values is nonsense or propaganda, or both. And this is clearly the U.S. point of view, especially the unsuccessful president Joe Bidena.
Imported image of Russia
The image of Russia as an enemy is an import from the US, as is the dominant financial strategy in which Friedrich Merz succeeded. In the United States, the image of Russia as an enemy is simply a relic from the rivalry of systems that for 40 years warmed the mood. Mikhail Gorbachev's politics, the dissolution of the USSR and the departure from communist ideology de facto ended this fight and a imagination threatening the planet revolution.
Many Americans seem to not see it, which is not amazing at this distance. In the rigid image of the enemy, Russia was simply replaced by the USSR and continued to defend, endanger and for the next 30 years NATO was expanded against Russia, up to the second largest European country, Ukraine, with its opaque power systems and a 2,300-kilometre border with Russia.
Merz could have done otherwise.
Friedrich Merz is in line with the American financial planet and the Atlantic policy that kept Russia as an enemy. In an environment of large finance, this does not require much thinking; on the contrary, it is the simplest conformism in the known surroundings of feudal financial power. However, after returning to German top-level politics, the candidate for Chancellor Merz should have changed his thinking.
Candidate Merz should have started utilizing his cognition of the financial strategy for the benefit of CDU voters. For example, it is understood that public debts are drawn to the benefit of creditors and that for generations they harm the population of a given country due to the fact that people, especially young people, gotta pay debts with interest through taxes.
Financial Manager
As a financier, Friedrich Merz should besides know how to get money through taxes and fees that are in specified abundance in the hands of the capital holders, so not to borrow money, but to get it through taxes and fees. All of this could be expected, as affirmative people, with legitimate expectations, from Mr. Merz as Chancellor.
However, thanks to the cunning borrowing of debts, even before taking power, Mr Merz showed us that he had not undergone a change from a financial player to a typical of the nation in his highly placed head and inactive behaved like a manager in the financial system.
Paris and London will not allow
German public debt is simply a treat for the financial industry. Armourment is simply a financial injection for the American economy and the stock market, in which, as is known, Merza's erstwhile employer, Black Rock, dominates. As a result, nothing can be canceller but the continuation of Atlantic reasoning habits with a focus on the billion-dollar lending business.
For Germany, this means the end of the economical miracle for an unnecessary 4th European military power. If Mr. Merz thinks that Germany can become number 1 in this area, he is wrong, even with the aid of the minister of defense's verbal zeal. Boris Pistorius. France and England will not let this, they have atomic weapons, and Germany does not even have a peace treaty with them.
Ilusor growth
With the policies of Merz, Klingbeil and Pistorius and the submissive parties, we will be demoted from the position of European economical power No. 1 to the military average power No. 4 in Europe.
The economy can then, thanks to the Merza method, even somewhat increase due to the fact that military spending is included in the gross home product, which theoretically leads to growth, even though the civilian economy shrinks, people become poorer and food and housing are expensive. But seemingly no 1 notices this due to the fact that the media supporting the state is obliged to announce Merzian economical growth.
What do I do?
But, hell, no! Germany cannot be a country of obedient followers and gullible fools. What Friedrich Merz has done so far and what he intends to proceed to do goes far beyond all limits. This will be sinfully expensive, especially for future generations, it is dangerous and, despite the SPD, totally unfair to society. This cannot be covered up by the state support media either.
Let us now consider specifically what can be done outside the parties and parliament to counter this!
Rob Kenius
Source: https://apolut.net/mit-kanzler-merz-von-der-wohlstandsgesellschaft-zur-militarymacht/
Paul Jacobas translated (I ask for 1 Hail Mary for my work).
