But the biggest concern was the “sociality” with another category of people:— with the unemployed. Unemployment has always existed — a strategy of a free-capitalist economy requires a certain number of unemployed hands in the labour market. This certain reserve of the labour army, these people thrown out by capital beyond the brackets of life, are needed to regulate labour prices. As shortly as unemployment disappeared on the labour market, wages immediately jumped up and the full calculation of the factories went to hell. Unemployment was so raised as the most precious flower of the liberalist economy. Capitalists' earnings, the sustainability of the system, the sacred capitalization and the alleged prosperity of the country were active – what so meant the rotting of respective tens of thousands of people! These people did not even have what the exploit individual had — they themselves did not know why life pushed them to the bottom, why they had to rot alive in the worst pits, why they were always hungry, like dogs spent off typical streets, why their children were born sick and died so quickly. The unemployed from Solca, from Balut, from Last Grosz, from Haarlem, from Wola, did not know that they had to rot and wither alive due to the fact that it was essential for a free-capitalist strategy to keep a "balance"; but a socio-economic expert like Marx knew it well. He knew more — he knew the function of the unemployed in the revolution. For it was they, those sleds—the porters who carried the Bastille, they bled on the barricades in 48 years, they were the nucleus of the Paris Commune, and yet... But he threw it all in their face like mud — the abusive word “lumpenproletariat!”.
The capitalists starved them, treated them like cattle, and worse than cattle — the hebrew defiled them! For what? For nothing — he just fell out of the calculation. He didn't know what to do with them! He hated them for their misery and despised them. Otherwise, it could not have been the most classical kind of “burge”. Read Marx's letters to Engels—there the rabbi's boy discovers the cards in front of the mill boy—he is sincere. He does not declare "social justice", about the harm to the abused, nor does he give theoretical considerations on overvalue, but he is simply a ion of hatred towards officers and officials. The hebrew was baking on the Prussians, as if he knew that 1 day these Prussians would crush judaic privileges. Marx wanted to destruct the Aryan state, but did not believe in the forces of the bourgeois revolution — it was for this “weakness” that he hated bourgeoisie and decided to usage it as a tool for his plans of working masses! Read Marx’s letters, and you will know him — what he wrote in brochures and resolutions — from something else he confided to a friend. The proletariat wanted to throw on the bourgeoisie, so that the strategy that he hated would be destroyed in this manner. But before the proletariat throws itself on the bourgeoisie, you gotta organize it, you gotta wait for a good chance for decades!... Unemployed people can’t take it — forever hungry people can’t be told to wait if they are organized, without waiting to attack. How do we organize mediocre people? They are a liquid element, mediocre people, outcasts, vagrants — like homeless dogs. What's different is that workers -- they work in factories, they're easy to gather, they're easy to agitate. It is adequate to inoculate “red” a fewer of them to infect the full factory. And they can wait... The choice of Mars fell on the workers, and the unemployed were given the contemptible name “lumpenproletariat” — no request to get them. erstwhile riots break out, the first will decision on to the attack and... the first will fall to bring their bodies to triumph not so much to organized proletariats as... Marx and Engels, polytruds and commissioners, Libknechts, Roses Luxembourg, Trotsky, Kaganoviches, Blum, Kelestrians, Belom Kun and all the Soviets. They will go to the barricades, into the fire, and they will die without knowing what they die for, as they do not know what they are rotting for alive! That was the calculation — that is why the abusive word "lumpenproletariat" fell out.
"Lumpenproletariat" is despised and hated by "proletarians", due to the fact that it is precisely from the "lumpenproletariat" that the "lamistria" are recruited. Lumpenproletariat! Between the working and the unemployed, there is no little sharp roller than between the ‘working class’ and the exploiters. This fight is no longer about overvalue, but about scraps falling from large capitalist tables. They're eating on skinny bones. This has always been the case, and so it is now, although the situation has fundamentally changed.
The unemployed were rotting, but the liberalist strategy was rotting too. Initially, the percent of non-employed was small, with 1 out of 10 unemployed, and present the opposite. For example, in Poland, industry, mining and transport employs about 600 000, and the unemployed have at least 6 million — 10 “lumpenproletaries” per worker! What has the proletariat won over decades? He won reduced working time, social security, occupation protection for women and young people, collective agreements, and representation in the form of delegates — in another words, he arranged a proletariat of better conditions, smoothed the class fight, and put it in the standard. But what has the “sociality” won for a ten-fold greater army of poorers, jobs without? Nothing! “Proletarian solidarity” includes only “proletarians” — lumpenproletariat disables! Let them die. They are not accepted into trade unions, they are not even allowed to work — printers or plushs, cotonists or polygraphers, all branches of work, where wages are better, for the unemployed do not exist. Proletarians, seemingly in the name of anti-capitalist solidarity, do not let students and apprentices. They're afraid there'll be besides much congestion around the scraps. A desperate picture, but can you blame the workers, organized in class trade unions, brutally repelled from the gates of the unemployed factories?
No, it is the responsibility of the creators of socialism and the leaders of the class movement. They were the ones who immediately let the “lumpenproletariat” out of contempt — they were the ones who broke the planet of work into privileged, organized “proletariat” and the entrenched “lumpenproletariat”! And the consequence is the present state of affairs, erstwhile a fewer comparatively fewer workers have specified rights, and most of them wither from starvation. They were the ones who — class - fighting preachers, softened the blade of the fight against exploiters due to the fact that they removed the most dynamic component from the fight! Through socialism, capitalists have been able to stand by the gold and power troughs for decades. The seminarians "fightd" for more than half a century and... capitalism only strengthened through that time, and the number of unemployed rose to millions. These “defenders” of the working class have not been able to defend even” their working and organized “proletariat” from exploitation, have not been able to supply him with anything more than Insurance and sold delegates!
It was only in a number of countries that nationalist movements, which abolished the artificial division into “proletariat* and “lumpenproletariat”, managed to overthrow the power of capital, managed to supply work for all — they yet removed from the masses cast overboard the life of the poor, the stigma of the undeserved insult of “lumpenproletariat”. For there is only 1 criterion for the classers—the usefulness of this or another group as a tool in the conflict between the Solians and the Aryan states; and for nationalists everyone is simply a brother whether he has a occupation or not. And that honesty in politics is the power of nationalism.
Kazimierz Halabuda
National-Radical Scripture “Falanga”, 1938.
