well-known globalist program under the appearance of multipolarity
Who has the strength and the desire to read a fat, political-watered paper I mention to the full texts of the Declaration of the Kazan BRICS Summit completed on 24 October 2024. ( see: https://brics-expert.info/documents/documents-esvu-briks/kazanskaya-declaratsiya-briks-23-octyabrya-2024-goda/)
In my opinion, a appropriate discussion and assessment of the content and the political and socio-economic importance of this paper can be found in the following text:
———
Kazan Declaration of BRICS Leaders: a known program of globalists under the appearance of multipolarity
The day before (23.10.2024, before the conclusion of the BRICS Summit 24.10.2024. – PZ) in the main city of Tatarstan leaders of Russia, China, India, Brazil, South Africa, Iran, Egypt, the United arabian Emirates and Ethiopia signed the Kazan Declaration (DK) of the 16th BRICS Summit. erstwhile we began studying it, we wanted to fill ourselves with hope and assurance that we had ahead of us a strategy to build a truly multipolar world, different countries of Eurasia and the South, fresh "power areas" that will make sovereignly, according to their own conventional values – and all this will lead to the prosperity of humanity. But from the first paragraphs we have unfortunately been greeted by a friend of the fresh UN Declaration, WHO, UNESCO and another globalist structures. And absolutely the same narratives and values as in the "Pact for the Future" late adopted in fresh York City at the UN headquarters. The only difference is that globalisation following the leading BRICS countries means greater engagement of all developing countries in Africa and South America – and it is proposed to put little force on them in implementing the UN Sustainable improvement Goals. Otherwise, almost the full Kazan Declaration Programme is about "sustainable development", "inclusiveness", "realising women's and girls' rights", "digital transformation and the creation of a single digital public infrastructure", "zero emissions and energy transformation", The Paris Agreement on Climate. The separate paragraphs of the declaration specify the "leading role" of the UN, WHO, IMF, WTO in all areas where Mondialists proceed to build global governance through them. The only clear point was the declaration on cross-border financial settlements in the BRICS countries in their national currencies, to make a single settlement strategy with the support of their central banks, which in future will let for complete separation from the dollar. But this is simply a small consolation, due to the fact that there is no sign of any multipolarity in the approach or national sovereignty at all. Let's decision on to studying passages of the document.
We quote from the text of the Kazan Declaration "Strengthening multilateralism for just global improvement and security", signed by BRICS leaders on 23 October in Kazan, published on the Russian President's website:
‘We, the leaders of the BRICS states and governments, confirm our attachment to the BRICS spirit, which is based on common respect and understanding, sovereign equality, solidarity, democracy, openness, inclusiveness, interaction and consensus. Based on 16 years of experience in organising BRICS summits, we are committed to further deepening cooperation within the framework of the enlarged BRICS in 3 main areas – policy and security, economics and finance, cultural and humanitarian links, as well as strengthening strategical partnerships for the benefit of citizens of our countries by promoting peace, a more typical and equitable global order, a renewed and reformed multilateral system, sustainable improvement and inclusive growth".
On the 1 hand, the “swing equality” of all countries and the “reformed multilateral system” are declared to be the same “multipolar world” that the Russian leader and another people have repeatedly stated. But it immediately says that this will be achieved through "sustainable growth and inclusive growth". That is the basic concepts of the UN Agenda 2030. Concepts that have nothing to do with respecting the sovereignty of individual countries, and on the contrary, aim to destruct them – in the economy, politics, safety – i.e. the key areas in which BRICS intend to partner.
‘We welcome the strong interest of the countries of the Global South BRICS and support the "Modernities of the category of BRICS partner countries". We firmly believe that the expansion of BRICS partnerships with developing countries and emerging markets will proceed to strengthen the spirit of solidarity and genuine global cooperation for the common good. We are committed to further promoting the organization improvement of BRICS“
True global cooperation and solidarity for the common good is affirmative in all respect, but it is very familiar. Delegations from developing countries were besides present in Kazan as guests and partners of the summit – with the possible of further integration of cooperation. But what precisely is "common good", with whom and by what means is it proposed to cooperate with BRICS?
‘Multipolarity can strengthen the position of developing countries and emerging markets to unlock their constructive possible and accomplish benefits for both sides, including and fair economical globalisation and cooperation.
Bearing in head the request to better adapt the modern architecture of global relations to fresh realities, we reaffirm our commitment to multilateralism and respect for global law, including the objectives and principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter (UN) as its integral basis component of the ent and to keep the central function of the UN in an global strategy where sovereign states cooperate to keep global peace and security, advance sustainable development, advance and defend democracy, human rights and fundamental freedoms for allIt’s okay. ”
It turns out that multipolarity is essential for "fair economical globalisation". For everything to be inclusive, i.e. to include the economies of all countries. At the same time, DK stresses the "central function of the UN in the global system". And of course support for "sustainable development" and "human rights". It is good that they at least ordered participation in this strategy of sovereign states.
‘We besides call for strengthening the function and representation of women, especially from emerging markets and developing countries, at different levels in global organisationsIt’s okay. ”
The increase in quotas for women at all levels and any kind of "strengthen the function of women" remind you of nothing? Well, of course it is about "protecting and extending the rights of women and girls" around the world, which is an crucial part of the UN Sustainable improvement Goals and the "Pact for the Future" late adopted in fresh York at the UN Summit, which we have examined in detail.
‘... we confirm our support for a comprehensive improvement of the UN, including its safety Council, to make it more democratic, representative, effective and efficient, and to extend the representation of developing countries in all categories of Council membership so that it can respond appropriately to the pressing global challenges.“
But this is much more interesting. It is clear that developing countries should be more broadly represented in the UN safety Council, but the same "Pact" clearly states that the improvement of the safety Council besides means the waiver of the right of veto of its individual member. It clearly sets the task of hitting the geopolitical capabilities and influences of Russia, a permanent associate of the UN safety Council. There's no explanation in DK, and that's besides bad.
"We reaffirm our support for an open, transparent, just, predictable, inclusive, just, non-discriminatory, principle-based and consensus-based multilateral trading strategy in which the planet Trade Organisation plays a central role...“
Many sovereign economists, especially a doctor of economical science. Valentin Katasonov has repeatedly stressed that the WTO is an instrument for the impact of developed countries on little prosperous economies, an chance to export processed products without duties. After its accession, industrialisation and the improvement of its own manufacture can indeed be put an end, as membership excludes protectionism policy in the economy. So that we can develop, abandon the "tube economy", that is what we need.
‘We reaffirm our commitment to maintaining a strong and effective global financial safety network, in which the global Monetary Fund (IMF) plays a central role, based on a quota strategy with adequate financial resourcesIt’s okay. ”
The attachment to the central function of the IMF – an organization that is simply a tool for the financial impact of the “money rulers” working with the US national Reserve and the planet Bank Group – well, it is very unusual to read into the BRICS leaders' declaration. due to the fact that the IMF is based on the Washington Consensus and the dominant function of the dollar as a planet currency in payments between countries. And at the BRICS summit it seems to be stated that the hegemony of the dollar must be fought.
"We consider the universal and inclusive nature of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable improvement and its Sustainable improvement Goals and that their implementation must take account of different national contexts, opportunities and levels of development, while respecting national strategies and priorities and in accordance with national legislation. We will make all effort to accomplish sustainable improvement in its 3 dimensions and commit to making it a central component of global cooperation to guarantee that imbalances and improvement gaps are effectively addressed.
This means that national priorities and legislation, as well as the opportunities of different countries, should be respected, but at the same time the request for universal implementation of the UN Sustainable improvement Goals and UN Agenda 2030 in BRICS will not be questioned. Moreover, sustainable improvement (originally defined by the Roman Club) is called the ‘central component of global cooperation’. And this definition, in case individual forgets, was invented to mildly describe the request to reduce the population and disindustrialize due to the fact that "less people mean little carbon dioxide," as Mondialists believe. And here the Kazan Declaration becomes rather akin to the "UN style" supporting paper "for the poor". But further – more.
‘We item the key function of the Group of 20 (G20) as the main global platform for multilateral financial and economical cooperation, which is simply a platform for dialog between developed countries and emerging markets on an equal and mutually beneficial basis in order to jointly search common solutions to global problems. We recognise the importance of further productive operation of the G20, based on consensus and result-oriented.
We look forward to the successful organisation of the G20 summit in November 2024 under the leadership of Brazil and confirm our readiness to coordinate positions in the interests of greater integration...“
The desire to "coordinate positions in the interest of expanding Inclusion" following the decision of the G20 planet Summit (another key globalist structure) is no longer very akin to supporting sovereign improvement and multipolarity. And the fact that Brazil will host the November G20 summit indicates that globalists are actively transferring the integration vector in their agenda to developing countries, to the alleged zone. "global south".
‘We confirm that the objectives, principles and provisions of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), its Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, including the principles of fair, shared but differentiated responsibilities and capabilities, given the different national circumstances, should be respected.
We will strengthen cooperation on a scope of solutions and technologies to aid reduce and capture greenhouse gas emissionsIt’s okay. ”
‘Emphasising the fundamental function of access to energy in achieving the Sustainable improvement Goals and noting existing risks to energy security, we emphasise the request for increased cooperation between BRICS countries as key producers and consumers of energy resources and services in order to accomplish a fair, inclusive, balanced, fair and equitable energy transition. We believe that energy security, energy access and energy transformation are crucial and must be balanced by the full and effective implementation of the UNFCCC and the Paris AgreementIt’s okay. ”
And here is simply a full commitment to the Green Agenda. Again, BRICS asks not to punish developing countries besides much if they are inactive far from "zero emissions" and "energy transformation" (i.e. abandoning hydrocarbon energy sources), but in their view everyone inactive has to implement this.
However, it is time to talk about clearly affirmative aspects of the Kazan Declaration. They are present, although they do not truly stick to the “general line”:
‘We reiterate that unilateral coercion measures, including unilateral economical sanctions and secondary sanctions contrary to global law, have far-reaching consequences for the exercise of human rights, including the right to development, for the full population of affected countries, disproportionately affecting mediocre people and susceptible people. We so call for the removal of these measures.’
Unilateral and secondary sanctions are the main weapon of our geopolitical enemies and not only Russia faces them. Calling for their elimination surely won't hurt.
‘We welcome the usage of national currencies in financial transactions between BRICS countries and their trading partners. We call for strengthening the network of correspondent banking between BRICS countries and providing settlements in national currencies in accordance with the BRICS Cross-border Payments Initiative (BCBPI), which is voluntary and optional, and we look forward to further discussions on this subject, including within the BRICS Working Group on Cooperation in the Payment Sector.’
Payments between BRICS countries in national currencies and the creation of a single strategy of cross-border payments to this end are an crucial step towards abandoning the dollar as a planet currency and the equivalent of exchange rates for another national currencies. And it will be a powerful blow to the influence of the neoatlantics. This is what Rothschild's publication The Economist described as "Putin's plan to destruct the dollar". It is no coincidence that the president even showed the head of the Central Bank Nabiullina a version of the fresh bill – the common currency of BRICS. We'll see how this communicative continues. We besides have clear concerns about the introduction of "digital ruble" and another CBDCs for these purposes. The crucial thing is that this does not affect national citizens in any way.
‘We reiterate our serious concern about the deteriorating situation and humanitarian crisis in the occupied territory of Palestine, in peculiar the unprecedented escalation of force in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank as a consequence of an Israeli military operation which has led to massive fatalities and injuries to civilians, fast displacement and widespread demolition of civilian infrastructure.
We condemn Israeli attacks against humanitarian operations, infrastructure, personnel and humanitarian aid distribution sites. We note the provisional measures taken by the global Court of Justice in proceedings initiated by South Africa against Israel.
We confirm our support for the adoption of the State of Palestine as a full associate of the United Nations in the context of an unwavering commitment to a two-state solution based on global law, including the applicable resolutions of the UN safety Council and the UN General Assembly and the arabian Peace Initiative, which provides for the creation of a sovereign, independent and sustainable State of Palestine in accordance with the internationally recognised borders of June 1967, with the capital in East Jerusalem, surviving alongside Israel in peace and security".
‘We express our concern about the situation in confederate Lebanon. We condemn the death of civilians and the tremendous harm to civilian infrastructure as a consequence of Israeli attacks on Lebanese residential areas and call for the immediate cessation of warIt’s okay. ”
A very balanced and clear position on the mediate East conflict, everything is named by name. However, here and the UN have a akin position; this simply does not halt the Israeli authorities who consider themselves chosen.
Next comes a large block of declarations on unified plans for digital technology and artificial intelligence. And it starts with the "leading function of the UN":
‘We emphasise the UN's leading function in facilitating the improvement of dialog in order to scope a common knowing on the safety of ICT (Information and Communication Technologies -PZ) and its use, including discussions on the improvement of a universal legal framework in this area, as well as on the further improvement and implementation of mostly accepted standards, principles and principles for the liable conduct of countries in the field of ICT use.
We besides believe that method assistance and capacity building play an essential function in the improvement of resources, skills, policies and institutions essential to strengthen the safety of nations while enhancing the reliability of ICT systems and accelerating their digital transformation, taking into account the interests and needs of developing countriesIt’s okay. ”
The request for a uniform legal framework for the usage of IT is being called upon, and all of this is to accelerate the "digital transformation" of developing countries and beyond. This is simply a repetition of Schwab's program from the WFE and the planet Bank. And of course from the UN.
‘Expressing concern about the fast digitisation of all aspects of people's lives in the 21st century, we emphasise the key function of digital data in developing and the request to intensify the interaction within BRICS on this subject. We emphasise that fair, inclusive and equitable data management is crucial to enabling developing countries to usage the digital economy and fresh technologies, including artificial intelligence".
Digitalisation of all spheres of life raises concerns in BRICS – that's evidently good. But they immediately say that we request to change and manage "digital data" more actively. And implement neural networks for these purposes. For device data management. We believe their owners too.
‘Recognising the importance of creating a favourable, inclusive and safe digital economy and that digital connectivity is simply a key prerequisite for digital transformation and socio-economic growth, we emphasise the request to strengthen cooperation between BRICS countries. We besides recognise that fresh technologies specified as 5G, satellite systems, terrestrial and extraterrestrial networks have the possible to stimulate the improvement of the digital economy. We are aware that a resilient, secure, inclusive and interoperable public digital infrastructure can possibly enable large-scale services to be provided and to increase the socio-economic opportunities for all".
The direct text talks about the creation of a digital economy that covers all spheres, covering all countries with communications networks of different formats. Moreover, the request for "public digital infrastructure". And this is simply a global UN project, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation – DPI, a single digital ID of the individual who serves all its interaction with the state (this was discussed in item earlier). That's beautiful sad.
‘We note the request to further grow the cooperation of BRICS in order to unlock ICT possible and facilitate the exchange of information in the area of regulation and dialog on artificial intelligence (AI) in order to make an effective global governance strategy based on a broad consensus to stimulate the national economy, and to support a human-focused approach focusing on development, social inclusion and sustainable development, in order to improve people's lives and destruct the digital divide, peculiarly between developed and developing countries“
The implementation and usage of artificial intelligence in the exchange and analysis of information at transnational level will be supported to make a global governance system. They argue that for the same intent it is essential to destruct the "digital gap" between countries. Everything is even besides honest.
And, of course, the global BRICS programme would be incomplete without WHO's praise and promise to fight fresh pandemics. Moreover, within a single global plan. who will yet prepare the same WHO for everyone:
‘We confirm our support for the central coordination function of the planet wellness Organisation in multilateral global efforts to defend populations from infectious diseases and epidemics, and reaffirm our commitment to improvement and strengthen the global strategy for preventing pandemics, preparedness and responseIt’s okay. ”
And any more gender-feminist agenda from BRICS:
‘We emphasise the key function of women in political and socio-economic development. We emphasise the importance of empowering women and their full participation on an equal footing in all areas of society, including decision-making processes, including managerial positions, which is fundamental to achieving equality, improvement and peace. We recognise that including entrepreneurship and women's access to finance will support their participation in business, innovation and the digital economy.
We highly appreciate the efforts of the BRICS Women's Business Alliance to advance women's entrepreneurship, including the launch of the Joint Digital Platform BRICS Women's Business Alliance, the organisation of the first BRICS Women's Entrepreneurship Forum in Moscow from 3 to 4 June 2024 and the first BRICS women's start-ups competition.“
This means that the participation of men in decision-making, management positions, etc. is not fundamental to achieving improvement and peace. seemingly there is no request to defend the freedom of men, their function is not so “important”... In fact, this approach does not in itself odor like any equality. And it shouldn't stink due to the fact that it's a copy of akin feminist-gender points from the UN's "Pact for the Future".
We believe that we have listed all the key points of the BRICS Kazan Declaration. It is clear that the aims of unifying countries of this seemingly alternate to the Atlantic bloc were considered to be practically the same as in the UN Declaration ‘The Pact for the Future’ late adopted at the ‘Future Summit’ in fresh York City (https://t.me/riakatisha/34838). Both the objectives and the proposed image of the future unification of BRICS are the same, and even everything is recorded in the same fresh York globalist. This means that, unfortunately, we have a acquainted model of globalisation before us, not only for the countries of the Atlantic bloc and their satellites, but for Eurasia and the "global South" – including Africa, South America. any kind of sub-project of the same curators – so in any case it follows from the text of the Kazan Declaration. Does Russia gotta invest in something like this and lead this process, especially by presenting this process as a way to a multipolar, just world, made up of sovereign states not subject to expected global governance? The question is rhetorical..
RIA Katius
for: https://katyusha.org/vojna/kazanskaya-deklaracija-leaderov-briks-znakomaya-povestka-globalistov-pod-shirmoj-mnogopolyarnosti.html
(citation and emphasis – PZ)
