Why do leftists love Islam, even though Muslims hatred them and have no contact points between Allah's followers and Marx's followers? Or not due to the fact that they are children and late grandchildren of Lion Trotsky and Altiero Spinelli. Or possibly due to the fact that they collectively claim that the origin of muslim fanaticism is not religion, but a consequence of Western colonialism and its resulting poorness and oppression. Because, indeed, if you remove Muslim symbolism, Islamists will find views on exploiters and exploiters, oppressors and oppressors, colonizers and colonized.
In a silent alliance between the extremist left and extremist Islam there is simply a simple rule: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” any and others are staunch opponents of the West, and the left are allies of Islamists in their aggression against Western civilization and are the other of everything represented by the hated Christian world. Leftist Marxism and extremist Islam place Europeans under the belt and accuse the civilization of a white man of all the misfortunes of the world. Just look at school textbooks to see a coherent message: It would be better if there were no white people. Without them there would be no slavery, no war, no belief in witches, no racism, no oppression of women, and no fire, no crying and no toothache. For leftks, all culture is better than European, they all couldn't full develop, and if it weren't for white, barbarian Europeans, Aboriginals and Pygmes would have landed on the moon first.
They are so blinded by their hatred of Christianity and of the white man that they do not see that the top enemies of their beliefs are Islamists. He does not realize that sooner or later their feminisms and genderisms will collide with the fanaticism of Islamists, that the warriors of social justice will collide with the warriors of Allah. They do not see that Muslims treat Europe as an easy prey, that they look at Westerners as dead creatures, and at their women as whores not even fit for harem. To find out, just look at the Qur'an's guidelines and compare them with Spinelli's Manifesto.
Working with Islamists (and even with Muslims) left (and even the left) see as an "glazed breaker" that will break down the social and cultural structures and above all the spiritual structures of the West. Islamists treat lefties as “useful idiots”, as a kind of naive doorman who lets everyone in without checking who he is. What else does the utmost left gotta do with extremist Islamists? Left hand is specified a fresh "International", specified a fresh "Comintern" building a European superstate – the Union of Socialist European Republics. And Islamists are “Islamic Komintern”, with which in many crucial points the leftist doctrine intersects. Islamism is not a religion, but an ideology based on religion, and Islamists have only 1 nationality – Islam. And here's the question: how come communism and Islam have not met before?
In all of this, there is another scammer in this game – globalists. due to the fact that as for lefties, Muslims, as for globalists, lefties. due to the fact that the aspiring leftists feed on scraps falling off the table of globalists. The association of Islam with aggression and terrorist attacks is besides part of a globalist reset. It is adequate to dig into the past of Muslims' stay in Europe to find that they came here not as a consequence of the invasion, but as a consequence of the globalists, having previously selected them.
Globalists operate on respective levels, and in each of them they substitute Europe. It is simply a coordinated strategy that globalists apply to decades. Already in 1911, the American paper "St. Louis Post-Dispatch" featured a caricature depicting Karl Marx surrounded by Wall Street financiers (everyone, without exception equipped with hook noses), hoping that communism would aid them in business.
The European Commission is backing a investigation task called "White Islam: a fresh religion for Europeans", whose main nonsubjective is to support converts to Islam and fight Islamophobia in Europe. The task assumes that the presence of Muslims can be an alternate to nationalism and "Christian anti-Islamic narratives", and Islam is simply a consequence to the "distortions" of the modern West. The task creates a database that tracks the evolution of political views of converts and analyses their contribution to criticism of the Western socio-political order. The task is addressed to countries that conflict with immigrant integration and spiritual tensions. In another words, it is simply a provocation to the cultural heritage of the continent and a violation of the rule of world-view neutrality which the leftists in Brussels so frequently evoke.
Just as the left enters an alliance with Islamists, so the anti-Islamic right enters an alliance with Israel. In March last year, the Israeli government convened a conference in Jerusalem "Againing Anti-Semitism". It was invited to the leaders of right-wing parties from France, Spain, Sweden, Hungary and the Netherlands (notabene, all with anti-Semitic record). The hosts and invited guests combined the perception of Islam as a major threat to Europe and the construction of a common front for the fight with Islamism (which all the conference participants willingly condemned). Pikanteria adds that to all invited, until recently, Israel has stuck the description “the utmost anti-Semitic right”.
On this occasion, the Israeli ambassador to Warsaw spoke, announcing that due to the presence of a Muslim number in Western countries, “anti-Semitism is being intensified”, that “it should be eliminated wherever it appears” and that “in Poland, where the problem is smaller, it should be easier to deal with.” And we did not believe our ears, due to the fact that so far we have heard something completely other – erstwhile in Western Europe a hebrew is afraid to go out on the street in Jarmulka, and German police defender synagogues 24/7, in Poland selling a hebrew with money is simply a manifestation of “animal anti-Semitism”. The Israeli ambassador's words besides sounded worrying due to how Jews destruct “anti-Semitism” in Palestine and announce the usage of an atomic bomb against the “anti-Semitic” people of Gaza.
The Polish right, unlike Western, is anti-Israeli. But that changes due to the fact that Dominik Tarczyński and Patryk Jaka appeared on stage. It besides turns out that the Islamisation of Europe is not only favoured by the European Union's depletable and anti-clerical political elites and judaic rights in the Law and Justice Union.but besides clergymen of the Church. An example of Cardinal Grzegorz Ryś, a spokesperson for Jews, Muslims and all others (only not Catholics), who are not disturbed by the call for the burning of churches, and the celebration of the conventional mass he calls “painting in front of the altar”, wrote: “Every man has the right to choose a place to live; and he has the right to be respected in this place in his beliefs, culture, language and faithIt’s okay. ”
Supporting immigration (not this spontaneous, but stimulated by globalists) is yet another proof of a leftist alliance with Islam. due to the fact that it is no secret that the alleged "Arab Spring" which gave emergence to an muslim invasion and which so weakened Christian Europe is the work of Mossad. While the hordes were pushing on European borders, Islamist leaders called for “the transfer of war to the hearts, homes and cities of Western crusaders” and their manifestations were swarming with black flags with a crescent. erstwhile muslim terrorism was revived, the lefties claimed that the little threatening 1 was muslim and much more dangerous erstwhile white natives utilized hatred speech. She was besides amazed to admit that too muslim terrorism there was left-wing terrorism. Muslims and leftists in Poland did not fall behind. Their demonstrations were attended by “Red Warsaw”, an organization associated with Trotsky International, a associate of the anti-fascist Coalition on 11 November, which blocked the March of independency in Warsaw.
The Left has opened Europe up to mass immigration under the pretext of tolerance, human rights and "climate warming" (which forces the peoples of the South to search cooling in the North). But this is just a pretext, due to the fact that creating a large spiritual number helps to yet remove Christianity and make a European superstate without spiritual and national identity. specified a task assumed that Muslims brought to Europe would undergo the same fast laicization as indigenous Europeans. Only that, contrary to the leftist dreams, Muslims did not assimilate, but began to radicalize religiously and overwhelm themselves with the children of the teted Europeans.
The Levites assumed that immigrants would become the political base of the far left. And that worked out due to the fact that the triumph of the leftist parties in the UK and France parliamentary elections would not have been possible without the support of Muslims. In specified France, 80 percent of Islam's followers voted for the fresh People's Front. And we have this charade: Today, without the support of Muslims, we cannot win elections. The Left became a hostage to Muslim communities. Muslims are not pawns in this game, but quarterbacks. True, any people treat suspicion with suspicion and effort to outsmart whom, but the consequence is obvious: It is the globalists who will outsmart and white lefts and snotty Islamists!
Incidentally, “events” related to the celebration of the Muslim feast ending Ramadan created Jews in Poland not only an chance to crusade against Islam, but to repeat with insistence that an illegal, legal good immigrant is evil. Meanwhile, Morawiecki's judaic right-wing government brought respective 100 1000 “legal” immigrants from Muslim countries to Poland, supported by Miknik's left, and Jan Hartman, grandson of Rabbi Isaac Kramsztyk, was glad that “there could be more mosques in Poland in 20 years than churches.”
When 50 years ago the Shah of Iran Mohammad Reza Pahlavi warned against the “red-black alliance of Marxists and Islamists”, French “intellectualists” Jean Birnbaum and Alain Finkelkraut (all of the Trotskys of judaic descent) ridiculed him. Not much, mocking chess suggested to the White home the concept of “Green Crescent”, a Muslim sanitary cordon designed to halt ungodly russian communism. And indeed; Ronald Reagan supported the mujahideen in Afghanistan, calling them the Freedom Fighters (freedom fighters), and the Mujahideen were assisted by volunteers from Muslim countries.
The result, the most dangerous, was the establishment of armed structures of the alleged muslim state, and the dominant place of secular political movements and power in Iraq, Syria and Libya were the muslim fundamentalists. As you can see, globalists are highly flexible – in the West, they usage the left as a ram for their ideas, and in the mediate East, Islam. In Osama bin Laden's library, next to the works of the founders of the Muslim Brotherhood, the book of judaic Communist Noam Chomsky, which is inactive widely read by students of American universities. Today, Chomsky expresses support for Hamas, an utmost sect of the Muslim Brotherhood, and American leftists describe Islam as part of the global and progressive left.
Except that we should not let the communicative of Israel, which seems to be fighting the Hamas militants in Gaza, commits the genocide of Palestinian women and children. But also, with all due respect to arabian friends, let's be honest: You couldn't handle the cowardly Israeli Jews, you're moving your conflict with the Jews to Europe. Not to fight Jews, but to fight white Europeans. And not to free Palestine, but to cut yourself, with the aid of Jews and left-wing assholes, a settlement space (sometimes in a very first way – like the Pakistanis in England – by raping white women, including 11-year-old girls.
And as for Ben Laden, let us remind that Radek Sikorski went straight to Polish diplomacy from the armed group of Afghan mujahideen, among which, on behalf of the British MI5 intelligence, he acted in the late 1980s. Later, thanks to his wife, he became a associate of the backdrop of American judaic politicians, descendants of activists of the Communist organization of the United States (by himself perversely and for the unspeakable called neoconservatives, and by actual neo-trockists). In his report, he stated: "Without the mujahideen there would be no circular Table in Poland". However, in the defence of Radek, it must be admitted that he did not apply for a peaceful Nobel for Osama Ben Laden, while the prize of EUR 1 million was awarded to Mustafa Dżemilev – Islamist, leader of the Crimean Tatars, whose crucial contingent fought alongside the muslim State under the care of Turkish intelligence (the same 1 that supported the movement of alleged refugees to Europe) whose participation in the extermination of Christians in Lewant is invaluable.
We want Poland without Muslim immigrants. Does that mean we're expected to hatred Muslims? On the contrary! We just want Poland to stay a Catholic country, and let the bisurmans pray to Allah at home. Islam is an alien civilization we must defend ourselves against. But is it in the interests of Jews to defend themselves by means of a dictatorship? It was the Jews who imposed the conditions of the debate on Islam and Muslim immigrants, setting it up like this: behind the wave of muslim invasion stands the muslim state and Hamas; millions of Muslims are coming to Europe to plant bombs, rape, establish a Caliphate and bring muslim law; If you do not want a Khanukah, you will have a Ramadan; Muslims are the enemy to fear and to whom Israel will defend you.
At the same time, they are for Muslim immigration. They succeeded in convincing the lefties that their intention was to encourage the Muslims of heaven, that the “Electoral Gazette” and the Soros Foundation direct the concern about the believers of Allah, that they defend “refugees”, and the opposition Poles are xenophobic and racists. Here is the charade: On the 1 hand, they endanger to conquer the land of the “unbelievers.” On the another hand, they order the “unbelievers” to fleece the invaders with their tails and thus simply put into effect the thought of cutting out the Christian goys with Muslimkind.
This is not about defending Islam or condemning it. The question is whether Poles are to form their identity in opposition to Islam or in opposition to rabbis from “Gazeta Wyborcza” who bless the influx of Muslims to Poland. And how naive in this context are the voices that the existence of a strong Israel can be useful due to the fact that “Israel binds crucial forces of the muslim planet in the mediate East and thereby weakens the jihad in the West.”
The threat to Poland is not Islam. The threat is those who, pretending to be patriots, shout about the muslim threatAnd at the same time they do everything to make a surviving space for Muslims. Those who manipulate public opinion are hounding illegal migrants and quietly let in these "legal" ones. That is why Poles request a fair diagnosis: It is not Islam that converts European nations into cultural gatherings. It is not Islam that erases the Christian face of the continent. It is not Muslims who disgust Poles with their identity, religion, household and ridicule their patriotism. And therefore, we want Poland without immigrants, but besides without those who are in favour of Polish ethnically and religiously skunk.
Read also:
K. Baliński: They'll blow the ax banders
