EXISTING A SATANISTICAL TYRANTY OF THE WORLD
This planet government already exists. The proof of that was uniformity of reaction to COVID, whether in China, California, Israel, Iran, Nicaragua, Venezuela.
UNDERJOHN MCMANUS EXPLAINS THAT THE UN REPRESENTS THE COMMUNITICAL TYRANIA. The planet wellness Organization is simply a UN AGENCY FINANCED BY BILL GATES.
Of course, behind all these hundreds of world-wide charts of ROTHSCHILD CENTRAL BANKS.(See: Maków "What is Communism?"
It's called money. They produce it from the air utilizing our ownNational credit cards. Everyone dances to their tune.
How The United Nations finances a wave of migrants flooding the United States
The United Nations finances a wave of migrants in the United States, and the evidence of this is frustratingly overwhelming. Unlike another attempts at immigration into the country, this is much more organized.
https://greatgameindia.com/united-nations-funds-migrant-wave/
The United Nations finances a wave of migrants in the United States, and the evidence of this is frustratingly overwhelming. Unlike another attempts at immigration into the country, this is much more organized.
https://greatgameindia.com/united-nations-funds-migrant-wave/
(since 19 Nov 2020)
Written by John F. McManus(JBS Bulletin, August 2019)
Are you aware of this?
Leaders of our nation They have been working for decades to deliver the United States to the United Nations as a major step in building the UN-controlled fresh planet Order.
Every year, since the founding of the UN in 1945, conspirators for global control have taken steps that endanger to destruct the independency of our nation and the freedom of the American people.
Please read the information below and join the Get US Out campaign! United Nations.
(As a associate of the John Birch Society, McManus cannot say that the planet government isKabalistic judaic tyranny of the world, i.e. judaic suprematism).
1.Incompatibility of US and UN government systems
American System: The fundamental laws are given by God and cannot be repealed. Freedom prevails. (See United States Declaration of independency of 1776)
UN system: Basic rights are granted by the UN government and can be cancelled "under the law". The deficiency of God's approval. A global organization draws up a list of rights it recognises and then claims the right to abolish them "under the law". (See the 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the 1966 UN global Covenant on civilian and Political Rights)
2. UN seeks to disarm American citizens and cancellation of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution
The UN has always sought to ban private possession of weapons. For example, in 1995, the global organization published Our Global vicinity (Our Global Neighborhood) in which it called for "civil population disarmament".
The UN Arms Trade Treaty (adopted by the UN in 2013) would yet disarm Americans. It was signed by the US in 2013, but was not ratified by the U.S. Senate.
3. The UN is an illegal body; Infringes Article 2 of his own charter
Article 2 of the Charter of the United Nations states: "None of the provisions of this Charter authorizes the United Nations to intervene in matters which are fundamentally within the interior jurisdiction of any State [nation]..."
Examples of violations by the United Nations of the Charter of Fundamental Rights include: (a) forcing U.S. citizens to quit their gold mining plans in Montana; (b) attacking the laws of the United States that licence the execution of the death penalty; (c) condemning the United States Border defender for efforts to ban entry to illegal immigrants; and (d) calling for Puerto Rico's independence, while even the population of this U.S. property has repeatedly signaled that it does not want to change its relations with the US.
(Algiers snort)
4. Each UN Secretary-General was either a Communist or a socialist
1945-46: Alger Hiss, Communist (United States)
1946-53: Trygve Lie, Socialist (Norway)
1953-61: Dag Hammarskjold, Socialist (Sweden)
1962-71: U Thant, Socialist (Burma, now Myanmar)
1972-81: Kurt Waldheim, Nazi Socialist (Austria)
1982-91: Javier Perez de Cuellar, Socialist organization (Peru)
1992-96: Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Socialist (Egypt)
1997-06: Kofi Annan, Socialist organization (Ghana)
2007-16: Ban Ki-moon, Socialist (South Korea)
2017- : Antonio Guterres, Communist (Portugal)
5. Article 25 of the Charter of the United Nations is superior to the Constitution of the United States and American sovereignty
The full text of Article 25 states: "United Nations members agree to adopt and implement decisions of the safety Council [UN] in accordance with this Charter".
No president or associate of legislature who has taken a solemn oath to abide by the United States Constitution can let Article 25 to dictate US politics. However, most U.S. officials believe that our nation is obliged to supply strength and weapons erstwhile the UN asks.
6. Articles 39-51 of the UN Charter mandated the United Nations to direct US participation in the "unpronounced," "impossible to win" Korean War. Articles 52-54 of the United Nations Charter allowed the creation of NATO and SEATO as "regional alliances" of the UN, which led to US engagement in "unpronounced", "impossible to win" war in Vietnam and Afghanistan. The United Nations formed in 1945 led the Korean War (34,000 Americans killed and 92,000 wounded). This war has never been settled.
Created in 1954, SEATO led the Vietnam War (47 000 Americans killed and 153,000 wounded). The Vietnam War could be won if it wasn't for the restrictions in advance. This war was the first defeat in the past of our nation.
Congress did not declare either Korean War or Vietnam War, as required by the United States Constitution. The United States' commitment to these 2 wars was due to our membership of the UN and SEATO.
Created in 1949, NATO led a "unspeakable", "unwinned" war in Afghanistan from August 2003 to December 2014 as the leader of a coalition of 50 states with a UN mandate, which included the United States, and which at its highest numbered 130,000 soldiers.
7. UN leaders argue national sovereignty, They advocate a planet government led by the UN
U Thant (1970): "Leninian ideals of peace are in line with the objectives of the United Nations Charter".
Boutros-Ghali (1992): "The time of absolute and exclusive sovereignty has passed. It's time to rethink sovereignty."
Kofi Annan (2000): "There must be fresh forms of global governance and global principles".
8. State Department officials bow to the United Nations.
Secretary of State Dean Acheson, 1949: "NATO was designed to fit precisely into the framework of the United Nations".
On the left, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, 1957: "I have never seen any proposal ... of a planet government or planet federation that could not be implemented either by the United Nations or by the United Nations Charter".
State Department official, Richard N. Gardner, 1974: "To put it briefly, the planet order home will should be built from bottom to top, not from top to bottom [through] the final run around national sovereignty, destroying it part by piece..."
Secretary of State Colin Powell, 2001: "As for our function as a associate of the safety Council, of course we are bound by UN resolutions and we are not trying to change that."
9. Many United Nations troops, based in immense buildings worldwide, proceed to build the power of the United Nations over all mankind.
The UN organisational illustration shows and indicates the presence and control of the global organization in the fields of education, population, children, women, the environment, trade, finance, health, agriculture, work, troops, science, culture, atomic energy, telecommunications, aviation, industrial development, drugs, refugees, immigration, property rights and others.
10. Disarmament for all – but for the United Nations.
In 1961, the U.S. Department of State issued a 19-page brochure entitled "Freedom from War: An American Program of Universal and full Disarmament in a Peaceful World".
The plan of this document, never withdrawn, called for "progressive steps" leading to the UN-dominated fresh planet order. It summarises the elements of this terrifying plan as follows:
(a) "States would only hold these armed forces and non-nuclear armaments [...] essential to keep interior order".
(b) "UN peacekeeping forces, equipped with agreed types and quantities of weapons, would be full operational".
(c) "Army production will be prohibited, but for weapons of agreed types and quantities to be utilized by UN Peacekeeping Forces. All another weapons would be destroyed or turned into peacekeeping."
(d) UN peacekeeping capabilities would be strong enough... to guarantee peace... in a disarmed world."
Resistance to this hellish proposal generated by The John Birch Society for many years led to its failure. However, applicable government officials have frequently acknowledged that this is inactive a permanent and determined policy of respective American agencies and departments.
CONCLUSION
The United Nations does not take over the United States. What is happening is that the United States is being handed over to the United Nations. This shipment must be stopped. The course is clear. The withdrawal from the United Nations must take place while there is inactive time. Get us out of here!
--------
Translated by Google Translator
source:henrymakow.com
