The fact that it is most likely to be murdered not by any mobster, terrorist, hunter, or mad amateur firearms, but by a government thug, is fundamentally known forever. The only difference in the subject present is that this fact is regularly illustrated by highly rich and reliable audiovisual material. Hopefully, in the minds of as many people as possible, it will cease to be only an intellectual abstraction, but it will become the origin of moral sobriety.
* * Oh, * *
The ghastly, quintessentically anti-moral nature of the statistic worldview is summarized in the phrase so eagerly repeated in fresh days by both the U.S. government and, worse, by its spontaneous defenders: “If you are killed due to the fact that you do not comply immediately with the orders of the typical of the regime, you owe yourself”.
It is easy to see that this is besides a 100 percent precise description of all form of full-sized slavery: “If you want to live, do what you are told.” This is besides a textbook denial of the natural law, which is replaced by the "law of the kaduk", or devilish governments of institutionalized, universalized and ideologicalized oppression.
Therefore, anyone who is close to natural law, along with any fundamental values secured by them, specified as individual freedom, physical immunity and the rule of non-aggression, should, in peculiar in the light of fresh events, make an additional effort to build specified a cultural and organization environment in which the representatives of the government will fear the consequences of murdering casual people, and not affronted people will be afraid of being murdered by the representatives of the regime. Only then will justice have any chance of becoming a real state of affairs, not simply a propaganda parody of itself.
* * Oh, * *
It appears that the grace-driven elephant way of drawing public attention from all the increasingly stinking cases of the Oblast is to make Latin America a "new mediate East" or a fresh ground of substitute wars – however, in the wake of fresh Venezuelan incidents of akin threats, Colombia and Mexico (and again Denmark, treated as an "honorary member" of the axis damaging the US's "security interests" due to categorical opposition to Greenland's proposal).
At the same time, these threats sound like an expression of not worshipful fanfaronade, but desperate madness: madness, which should erstwhile and for all realize that in the accelerating momentum of rotting imperial-safe statism towards spectacular self-destruction may be the parties of evil and worse, but there are no good sides. So, in a individual perspective, we request only to guarantee that we absolutely do not participate in this rush and defend ourselves to the degree possible from being involuntaryly kidnapped by him – only then, even if he does not save everything, can at least save his dignity and conscience.
* * Oh, * *
If a given government is so rotten and demoralized that it is either depended on the presence of 1 man, already despised even in the circles of his closest collaborators, then its overthrow should be easy based on a bottom-up social initiative in the form of mass protests. Then the natural consequence of this bottom-up government change can be the peaceful transfer of power to individual who actually enjoys the broad support of the public and is able to service to bring him on the straight.
If, on the another hand, a safe operation of abroad origin with a clear oligarchical interest in the background becomes an inflammatory point in the regime's process of change, then the fresh power, regardless of the degree of organic social support, acts in the shadow of automatic suspicions of being pawns of abroad forces. This, on the another hand, represents water on the mill for the erstwhile nomenclature and rival mafia factions, leading to a chronic civilian war – if not hot, at least cold – and creeping organization decay, so well known even from various countries in the mediate East, which besides experienced “the liberation of the large Brother”.
In another words, there is no shortcut to freedom, justice and the regulation of law – especially erstwhile the first step on this way is an event that, both at the level of intent and at the level of execution, has a most accidental or even cynical relation with these concepts.
* * Oh, * *
The defiance of militaryly weak dictators (and narcissistic flaunting for this reason) while at the same time thanking the militarily stronger dictators can only be perceived by the second as a motion of weakness that attempts to make up for the tromtadration—or as a motion of inexpensive opportunism (in this case, the oil jump), which disqualifies the government as a credible peace negotiator occurring in global conflicts from a position of moral superiority. So this is simply a decision that is conducive to all those who want to ignite global military tensions. Only that and so much – without entering the bidding on the comparative crime of individual regimes.
Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski
