One rabbi says yes, another rabbi says no

On June 1, 2011, the Palikot Movement was registered, 40 MPs entered the Sejm a fewer months later, and the organization received two-digit support, precisely 10.02 percent. Among the supporters and organization candidates was the "flower of the 3rd Polish elite", including Kazimierz Kutz, Ryszard Kalisz, Manuela Gretkowska, Robert Biedron, or today's Chief MEN Barbara Nowacka. However, the top sensation of the movement was another ambiguous figure, due to the fact that for the first time in the Polish Sejm there was a "transgender person" Anna Grodzka. After 1 word from this political creation, nothing was left, and leader Janusz Palikot was convicted of advertising alcohol, but the worst trials only before him.

Looking at Grzegorz Braun's career and the euphoria that now shows support for this manager and performer, it is hard to defy the analogy, although this 1 sounds like heresy to many. Both the left-wing environment will be outraged at the comparison between Palikot and Braun, as well as the utmost right will express its outrage, but despite the different ideological layer, we will find many common points. First of all, both groups are based on a leader, and I don't think anyone has any doubts about that. Braun and Palikot built their designation on scandalous provocations and an ongoing political spectacle. In the ranks of both parties there were people with utmost emotions and controversy, specified as mentioned Grodzka, or Grzegorz Piotrowicz, the killer of priest Jerzy Popiełuszko. Braun appeared publically with Janusz Walus and patostreamers: Wojciech Olszański and Marcin Osadowski, who have many problems with the law.

Only on the basis of these fewer common points is the painting itself of a political panopticum, without any chance of serious political activity, and this should always be the pursuit of power. Palikot and Braun are typical representatives of anti-system movements and specified movements are always the star of 1 season. Grzegorz Braun is at the tallness of his popularity, he made a good consequence in the presidential election, although with 6 percent support his supporters made Olympic gold, while Sławomir Mentzen gained more than twice the result. Additionally, the leader of the Confederation of the Polish Crown is driven by polling "pumps" and processes. There is no specified action, the present liberal-left power depends on the face of the right, as shown by Grzegorz Braun, the “brothers of Kamraci” and Janusz Walus, due to the fact that it is simply a face accepted by the mountains of 8 percent voters, while the remainder escapes with a shout at the thought that specified an utmost right can regulation Poland.

At the moment, the future political destiny of Grzegorz Braun and his parties, which may turn out in completely other directions, is decisive. Without question, court trials are an excellent promotion for scandalous politics and you can see that it feels like a fish in water, but it is besides a large trap. Janusz Palikot at 1 point simply started boring and no further scandal rebuilt his erstwhile position. The question is, how long can Grzegorz Braun shock and focus on himself? You can see to the bare eye that Braun's most popular hit inactive remains a seismic action with a fire extinguisher, which occurred 2 years ago. This means that reaching for increasingly provocative content, specified as undermining the existence of gas chambers, is secondary and does not give fresh fuel.

Such a fresh fuel for Grzegorz Braun may be the function of a martyr pursued by anti-Polish power and “international Jewry” if he is sentenced to deprivation or at least a regulation of freedom, in 1 of the trials, but it besides carries danger. A individual convicted of a deliberate crime being prosecuted by public prosecution may not stand in any election. Theoretically, it is possible to build a organization and electoral letters on the legend of the embedded leader, but sitting behind bars is not possible to carry out fresh provocations, and the power will calculate whether it is more profitable to feed Braun, or greater political gains will be brought by the spectacular delegation of his party. Nothing here is settled And if you compare the chances with the dangers, there's definitely more of them. Therefore, the future and possible political success of Grzegorz Braun is included in the well-known statement: “One rabbi will say yes, the another rabbi will say no”.

We don't believe anyone, we don't believe anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!