Contrary to appearances, I am not the enemy of entrepreneurs. I value ethos (here I make my best Facebook ax) entrepreneur – individual who risked his full estate, worked hard, created jobs, etc.
But modern capitalism, contrary to appearances, is not the domain of specified entrepreneurs. We are ruled by corporations, and in corporations, the entrepreneurs are uncommon gems, specified as this ancient Steve Jobs, which is mentioned on specified occasions.
Ex-president of Hewlett-Packard Carly Fiorina loves posing for individual like Jobs in a skirt. Ridiculous reaction Steven Levy for these boasts is the main inspiration for this blog.
I see any fantastic sign of the times in that leading Republican organization nominees in the American presidential election are business losers who can only waste another people's money (shareholders, taxpayers, etc.), but they themselves would not be able to cope with a tiny vegetable booth. These are the moments where I would truly like to hear from individual who has different views than I do, what he sees looking at Carly Fiorina (or Jeb Bush, or Donald Trump, etc.).
I see individual who was born into a privileged family, so the first million just inherited. In specified a situation, you may be foolish, lazy, incompetent.
Family connections will let you to “work in business” anyway, if you will. And if you work with negative results, at worst you will be a right-wing policy, praising taxation simplification the richest, as a way to encourage the mythical “creation of jobs”.
Fiorina's daddy came from a wealthy Texas family. She could afford to pay for a prestigious law school, so Daddy became an influential judge, and in Nixon's administration, the equivalent of our Deputy Minister of Justice was scorned.
Fiorina besides finished law school and would besides become a prestigious judge, but wanted to “try”. And this is as a pianist, and this is as a businessman. Who forbids the rich?
As a lawyer, she supervised Lucent's entry into the stock market. This made her a professional board associate and supervisory board associate – she went to an elite club where, at the golf game, members and members arrange board members in ‘I'll support you if you support me’ transactions.
That's how she became the worst president in Hewlett-Packard history. She made all the incorrect decisions.
She's been punished for the only punishment that happens to the incorrect president: leaving with space briefing, 21 million in the pocket plus another 19 million benefits.
Because the CEOs of stock companies do, hazard – but with another people's money. Whether the company stands, whether the company is lying – the president deserves a bonus.
Donald Trump, in turn, was born into the hotel manufacture thanks to his grandfather, who made money in the heat of gold. Not as a gold digger, but as a hotel owner and restaurant owner, where gold diggers spent the remainder of the money they took with them to Klondike.
Trump's own business successes had none. First he worked for a household company, then he started his own. These 4 times. broke. The shareholders were in the back, Trump at all bankruptcy just got richer.
Like Jan “santo subito” Kulczyk, Trump did the best business involving public money. Somehow, the city of fresh York was always happy to give it a taxation relief, if not a taxation relief, is the right of first purchase. That's how he made his fortune, which now, perhaps, will make him president.
Jeb Bush was born in a modest household of the president of the United States. Okay, I don't even want to make fun of it anymore, the Bushes have been the best parody of themselves for years.
Maybe they're reading my blog for any Shokagou polios who'll vote for Republicans. Or possibly just supporters of the Polish right, who in the hypothetical elections "Sanders vs Trump", would vote for Trump (I, of course, for Sanders, but Hillary would not despise as insignificant Evil).
Do you truly like capitalism like that? I'd knock 91% of the taxation on those parasites on the board of supervisors, like in times maximum tallness (1946-1964).
Just to “reject”. possibly if they get discouraged, they'll lose less.
