Jastrzębski: Nawrocki turned out to be Nawrocki

Karol Nawrocki signed a law on Ukrainian citizens in Poland on Friday as expected by the mainstream and the Ukrainian lobby. It prolongs their legal residence for a further period and limits the right to pay 800+ per child. That doesn't surprise me. After all, we know his actions from the IPN period, and his statements before the election campaign. It would be amazing if he behaved here in accordance with the Polish national interest.

Karol Nawrocki is simply a typical of the typical virgin of the 3rd Republic of Poland. His superiority over Rafał Trzaskowski lies only on the fact that he rejects the mutilated ideas of planet left in the sphere of morals and culture. In contrast, erstwhile it comes to geopolitical direction, aside from the ornamentation of speeches, there are no major differences between him and the remainder of Polish political actors. And it can't be.

I am not amazed by the decision of Karol Nawrocki. I'm stuck with it. I fishy president Nawrocki isn't a private ukrainophile. In my opinion, he is specified a fanging dislike of both Germans, Belarusians, Russians and Ukrainians. Only that nothing can be done due to the fact that crucial decisions are not made in the Presidential Palace, but in the cabinets of Washington, Brussels or Tel Aviv.

A lot of things had to change to keep things the way they were. However, it is good that the presidential election was lost by Rafał Trzaskowski. Firstly, there is no full power of the Civic Platform. So he's got to piss with the PiS guys. Let this solidarity household proceed its civilian war for leadership over Styrofoam. As long as they take care of themselves, they have little time to spoil Poland. Secondly, in any way following the current American course, or Trumpism, Karol Nawrocki may be a bit inhibited by green or rainbow madness.

Karol Nawrocki most likely had a chance to become individual like Viktor Orbán. There was a time erstwhile Orbán was the origin of European ideas and akin nonsense. In the late 1990s he shouted “Russian won”, and protested under the Russian embassy. He wanted russian monuments destroyed. He besides went under the Chinese embassy to talk about free Tibet. And present he is simply a sensible politician, rejecting irrational rusofoba. He rejected the sick ideas of Soros, Brussels and began working for sovereign Hungary. Sovereigns as much as conditions allow.

The Bible tells us about Saul’s transformation from Tarsus, 1 of Christendom’s most fierce enemies, into the apostle Paul. Charles Nawrocki remained Saul. It is inactive a solitary so much, that a taped white-red ribbon like the heir of Prussia in the movie Stanisław Barea "Miś". In the midst of indulgent patriotism, cursing, loud declarations of sovereignty, insurrection spells, huffing towards neighbors, the roar of insurgent songs and smoke of church incense is conducted by him precisely the same abroad policy as for Andrzej Duda. But let's face it, they wouldn't have let us do it today. Next year, we'll have a colorful revolution. Even the tiny Hungarians Viktor Orbán will most likely besides lose power in the upcoming elections.

Poland is simply a bigger and more crucial country in geopolitical clash. So she's more guarded. Nawrocki alternatively of Trzaskowski, is the biggest change that the decisive centres have allowed. As of today, we have no chance of winning the election. This is the plane on which the Adversary defines the time, place, subject and kind of combat. If individual sits at a card table with cheats in a mean den and thinks they will win – it is ridiculous. Elections for present will not change anything important, due to the fact that they will not change the strategy and its priorities. This is no longer the democracy we know from the pages of history. Today, 1 incumbent squad replaces another. Even as any seem fairer, more sympathetic and more oppositionous, they will shortly enter into the same agreements, agreements and directives.

Even if we were in their place, nothing could be done in a fewer people. The story of the bridgehead is harmful due to the fact that it gives false hopes. We are arrogant to talk about the 7 Members who opposed NATO membership. Praise them, but what did it do in the long run? Today, honest MEPs can afford any political happenings. In practice, Poland will have small of this.

Our goal must be clearly different. We can't anticipate political actors to prosecute a policy other that of their sponsors and mentors. At most we can observe with any appreciation certain processes of inhibition on cultural and moral issues.

Łukasz Jastrzebski